23.9.26

 

THE VOICE OF FIRE

 

Ink Illustration, B. Van-Asten. 7th April 1993


Volume 2, Number 2. Autumn Equinox. An CXXII. Wednesday 23rd September 2026 e.v.

 

‘Draw into naught
All life, death, hatred, love:
All self concentred in the sole desire –
Hear thou the Voice of Fire!’

 

Tannhauser. Aleister Crowley.

 

Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law.
Love is the law, love under will.

Volume 2, Number 2 of the Voice of Fire is dedicated to Kenneth Martin Ward (1887-1927).

 

 

CONTENTS

Editorial
Kenneth Martin Ward
Ballade of Lakeland Loss (poem)
The Tenth Aethyr by Audrarep
The Heart’s Ascension (poem)
Pinnacles, Peaks and Poetry
Giambologna’s Oceanus (poem)
Chansons du Phallus (poem)
Upon a Vision of Beauty (poem)
Ballade of Greek Love –After Crowley (poem)
The Silver Cigarette Case
The Magick Bookworm


 

 

 

EDITORIAL

Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law

 

As this glorious summer draws to a close we can reflect upon our journey thus far; we have arrived at the summit and can look down upon our progress upon the path and begin to descend to the fertile meadows below once more. One may ask one’s self whom did I encounter that was truly assigned to destiny or fate who in turn has enriched my life or my work, and indeed, in whose life have I made a real difference? Before this editorial becomes a parody of a vicar’s sermon, I want to say that those of us who have chosen magick or the Thelemic path, or felt they have been called to it, will already understand the significance of signs and symbols and their occurrences which defy explanations and cannot be put down to mere coincidence – these ‘messages’ resonate with the heart and brain and help to steer one along the rocky road of initiation – they are designed to speak to the acolyte on a purely personal level so that misunderstandings cannot, or should not occur; the irregularities and peculiarities are a direct link towards the intended ‘listener’ that it should penetrate the subconscious and make one aware of its intent and purpose, leaving no doubt in its wake. Call this what you will, Angel, Guardian, Secret Chief, God or Goddess, the experience is the same for each of us to interpret individually and either make adjustments if you are wise or ignore if you are foolish. We are not alone in this – you are not alone in this, you never have been, neither have all those who have travelled before us or will travel after us – if you are alive and reading this trivial editorial in the present (and I’m sure many of you are, almost) then we can safely say we are sharing the same passage of terrestrial time with our spirit or ‘soul’ encased in physical matter (the body) – now we are getting somewhere! If we are fortunate this body is somewhat resilient and healthy but all flesh is finite and I’m sorry to break this to you but one day you, me and everyone will die, that is the nature of existence. But before that day comes, live your life as beautifully and richly fulfilling as you can, leave no regrets and help those in need who want and deserve help; listen to the ‘messages’ and see the ‘signs’ and continue the arduous journey along the path; mistakes will occur, they are supposed to, but listen, reflect and react and make every step a joyous one, for yourself and those you love around you! Perhaps this was a sermon after all!

I have had a delightful distraction from the harsh horrors of the world around us – war, floods, earthquakes, wildfires and other devastating destruction…  in researching my article on Crowley’s climbing passion: Pinnacles, Peaks and Poetry, I came across an article from May 1892 in which sixteen year old Crowley was brought before the bench at Lambeth Police Court for ‘extinguishing a public street lamp’ and fined ten shillings which I have never seen published anywhere before and his simple answer to the question: ‘what made you do this foolish trick?’ – ‘I don’t know sir’ echoes with the rebellious nature of youth against authority even before the archetypal concept of the angst-ridden teenager; it humanises the boy who would become the Great Beast. I have also (I believe) discovered the unknown Fothergill who tutored Crowley and took him fishing in Scotland and they both ended up in the loch and in Crowley’s words he ‘tried to drown me’. If there was anything, apart from poetry and chess, which brought Crowley from the depths of his dreary Plymouth Brethren existence and shaped his destiny, it was climbing. His fascination and enthusiasm for rock and chalk is quite infectious and his approach, although rather unconventional and daring, was always methodical and undertaken with thorough caution and complete mental examination of the crags. I watched his progression from fell to Alp and stood with him on summits – I was there with:

 

Young Alick, climbing Beachy Head
And roaming Lakeland fells and hills;
I saw Crowley climbing crags –I sped
Off swiftly hunting Fothergills!
He chuckled: ‘I leave no clues behind
For you to forage ‘mongst the dead –
No doubt some damned fool hence shall find
That miserable Fothergill’s forenames, un-said!
And I put up with his general cloistered wit –
I threw his rod into the loch;
We wrestled; I then threw him in after it –
He upturned the boat and to my shock
Tried to drown me – damn the man
And curse his soul to hell
And purely that these damn lines scan
Damn the Alpine Club as well!
And damn Sir Gerald Festus Kelly
And damn that fool and scoundrel Yeats,
Neither knew their Byron from their Shelley
Or their Swinburne from their Keats!’

 

I kiss thy hand from worlds afar
O Prophet of the Lovely Star!

 

In this edition I have brought an abundance, well almost, of poetry for which I make no apologies (I could have produced much more so consider yourself fortunate) and I am proud to present the first publication of Meredith Malkarth’s poem Chanson du Phallus in a translation which the author (foolishly perhaps) entrusted to myself – I hope he forgives my incompetence in French and sends further works for future publications. I also wish to thank a new poet, as yet unpublished, Miranda Fletcher, for her tantalisingly erotic poem, ‘Giambologna’s Oceanus'; may I add to her list of seductive sculpture, the elegant form of the drowned poet Shelley, (by Edward Onslow Ford) whose shapely marble contours grace the Shelley Memorial at University College, Oxford, and of course, we cannot forget, poor Paris, by Euphranor, for his clapper has been eternally silenced and his bell rings no more! In a world increasingly drawn towards hostile ideologies, the simple pleasure of betrothals in marble, that tender collision between stone and skin, is quickly becoming a lost art! But I have it on good authority that a secret sect of pygmalionists exists in Swansea and that there is a minor tributary running through the House of Lords!

 

Love is the law, love under will.

 

 

KENNETH MARTIN WARD
(1887-1927)

 

‘And when the vivid voice is still,
And the eloquent face is gone,
Dull memory is mute and chill,
The ecstasy is flown.’

[To A Lecturer. Olwen Ward.
Cambridge Poets. 1913. p. 205]

 

Kenneth Martin Ward played such a minor role in the life of Aleister Crowley, yet it would prove to be a very influential and specific encounter of great significance, which one may even say, was designed by the gods themselves!

Kenneth Martin Ward was born in Cambridge on 11th August 1888, the son of Professor James Ward (1843-1925) and Irish born suffragist, writer and lecturer, Mary Jane Martin (1851-1933) who were married in Nottingham on 31st July 1884. Dr. James Ward, (1) F.B.A., Sc.D (Cantab.), Hon LL.D (Edin) Hon DSC (Oxon). Professor of Mental Philosophy at Cambridge University went up to Trinity College, Cambridge in 1873 on a scholarship, attaining a first in the Moral Science Tripos and a Fellowship two years later; he became a Cambridge Apostle. Mary (2) was educated at Newnham Hall [College] in Cambridge in 1879 and was the first woman to pass the Moral Science Tripos with fist-class honours. After James and Mary were married they lived in Cambridge and after the birth of Kenneth, two daughters were born: Hilda Marjory Ward, born on 10th October 1888 (3) and Agnes Olwen Ward born two years later in 1890. (4)

As a young boy living in Cambridge, Kenneth became friends with another boy who recently moved there named Frank Kingdon-Ward (1885-1959); Frank’s father, Harry Marshall Ward (1854-1906) was appointed Professor of Botany at Cambridge University and the family came to Cambridge in 1895. Young Kenneth and Frank became firm friends ( and so did their respected sisters, Hilda Ward and Winifred Mary Kingdon-Ward, 1884-1979, the renowned speech therapist) and enjoyed many adventures and escapades together – ‘during their school holidays the two boys were inseparable, sharing a mutual delight in roaming the countryside and camping out, often quite deliberately subjecting themselves to discomfort. They normally scorned the use of tents or sleeping-bags, instead digging shallow holes in banks for shelter, sleeping under railway bridges, or in railway wagons parked in sidings. They called themselves The Giddy Oysters, and the more daunting the enterprise the more attractive it became. One of their most eventful journeys was from Cambridge to Oxford, towing their kit on a home-made trolley attached to both their bicycles. Halfway to Oxford the trolley had all but destroyed their bikes, and was itself hopelessly disabled. At Buckingham they left the bicycles to be repaired, and hired a boat to continue the journey by water, first on the small spur canal that linked Buckingham to the Grand Union Canal, and then by canal through Banbury to the Thames and Oxford. The weather was appalling – a bitter wind and drenching rain. In the journal they kept they wrote:

‘Finding late in the evening after a long search a retired spot by the river, we moored our boat and set up the tent… We then after some difficulty – the wood all about being damp – managed to light a huge fire to dry our things by. We retained only our shirts, and proceeded to scorch both ourselves and our clothes beside it, dancing round every now and then to keep warm. Badly needing supper (it was then late and dark), we made some tea, so called: awful greenish soupy stuff that was all the dingy little village shop nearby could supply; and tried to eat some food that they had to offer – and it was worse than the tea! That meal was a record stomach-surprise!

We then got into the tent and huddled up into the clothes, still damp in places; but the scorching in others no doubt made up for that! We stuffed up some of the gaps in the tent with grass, but the bitter wind blew it over us.’

The great adventure continued the next day and when they reached Oxford they visited the colleges and returned to Buckingham by boat to collect their repaired bicycles. They sent the trolley and their camping kit and equipment on by train and late that afternoon cycled the seventy miles back to Cambridge beneath a bright and beautiful moon. They wrote poetically of that moonlit ride in their journal, saying that it was a ‘lovely crisp, starlight night, the moon shining clearly on all around… the fields seemed slowly to revolve past us, merging into the mist and fading away into the grey night beyond. But now and again thick banks of vapour crept out of the general dimness, lurking here and there in the hollows, or rolling up the valleys and enveloping the meadows in their deep mantle. All this had a soothing effect as we peddled by, ever leaving fields behind and ever meeting fresh ones gliding phantom like out of the mist in front.’ (5)

During the Christmas holidays Frank and Kenneth went on what they called ‘Nightlies’, general boys’ mischief, escaping from their homes in the middle of the night and break into an old derelict building, such as a barn or an old house, make themselves comfortable and light a fire and cook. Returning back home they would delight themselves by letting off home-made rockets and if they were chased by some angry resident or game-warden, so much the better and greater the fun!

Frank Kingdon-Ward was educated at St. Paul’s School, London and went up to Christ’s College, Cambridge in 1904 but unfortunately had to leave after two years due to his father’s death on 26th August 1906; he became a distinguished botanist, plant collector, explorer and author. Kenneth attended Oundle School and notably climbed the 215 foot spire of Oundle Church and tied his handkerchief to the weather vane, as many newspapers of the time reported:

‘Oundle Spire Scaled, schoolboy proved an awesome spectacle. Quite a sensation was caused in Oundle on Tuesday [31st July 1906] morning by the news that a senior boy named Ward had performed the daring feat of ascending the Parish Church spire. About 6 o’clock as the school were preparing for departure for the holidays, Ward scaled the almost precipitous structure, and after tying his handkerchief to the spindle bar of the weathercock, made the descent to the very bottom of the tower. (6)

The Cambridge Independent Press of Friday 10th August 1906 (p. 4) said that ‘it was the day of the Grammar School speeches. Ward is Captain of the school gymnasium. It was his last day at school, and in the early morning before people were stirring, he slipped out and eagerly started on the dangerous climb…’ This event occurred just a few days before his nineteenth birthday which was on Saturday 11th August and before he went up to Cambridge University.

Kenneth matriculated at Emmanuel College, Cambridge in October 1906 on a Physics and Chemistry scholarship and was awarded a first in the Mathematics Tripos, but Ward decided to study literature, art and philosophy.

Kenneth still found time to go on wild adventures with his friend Frank, even as an undergraduate; the following tale is taken from Frank’s sister Winifred’s unpublished biography of Frank:

‘I remember the time they decided to go to the Cambridge Theatre dressed as girls – an escapade that would certainly have meant them being sent down if they had been caught. No thought of this, naturally, entered the heads of Kenneth’s sister Margery and myself when we were roped in to provide the necessary disguises. Never will I forget the night when in deadly secrecy, the four of us gathered in my bedroom to fit them out in our evening frocks. Frank’s was a flimsy affair of muslin lace which came to the ground on me but only reached half-way below his knees. Absorbed in trying to make the frocks meet round them, a matter more of hope than anything else, nobody noticed the trifling detail that he was wearing football boots. Their hands (Kenneth’s were like hams) would not go into our gloves, so they put on mittens and then stuffed them into muffs suspended from their necks, as was the fashion at the time. They had hired wigs from the theatrical outfit shop in the town, and to crown them they borrowed our flowery summer hats. The general effect was indescribable. Off they went with their escort, a college friend of Frank’s named Bertie Brierley (in those days an escort for girls was obligatory). The show was a musical, and their seats in the very middle of the front row of the stalls. Some of the chorus girls grasped what was up and sang straight at them a popular song of the day – “Hullo! Hullo! Hullo! It’s a different girl again!” Substituting “man” for “girl”. Winifred paints a charming picture of Kenneth which shows his excellent sense of humour and his lack of respect for authority. Winifred continues: ‘By then the boys were beginning to think they had bitten off more than they could chew. Kenneth had had a  terrible time removing his hat, which was skewered on with long hat pins; when, at last, it came off, his golden wig nearly came with it. The audience, mostly undergraduates, were getting more and more curious, craning their necks to see what was happening; one group started clapping. Kenneth and Frank jumped up and made for the exit, but as they edged their way between the audience and the footlights Frank stumbled over a man’s feet, and swore loudly in a voice hardly that of a young lady. When they at last succeeded in gaining the exit there were no cabs about, and they had to hoof it hard the long mile and a half home. Bertie Brierley was unluckier still. He had been recognised by the manager who, with singularly unsportsmanlike instinct, wrote a long letter to his tutor, with the result that he was gated for a fortnight, at which the other two laughed heartlessly and uproariously.’ (7)

Kenneth had a great love of climbing and did many climbs in North Wales and the Lake District. In April 1908, Kenneth and fellow climber, H. B. Gibson, made several impressive climbs on Glyder Fach, devising new routes. Kenneth published an article on their climbs in The Climbers’ Club Journal in June 1908, and he here describes the morning of the ascent upon the Slab Route and the Oblique Gully, 22nd April 1908: ‘The following morning, sleet and snow unfortunately confined Mr. Gibson and myself to that portion of our tent that the winds had allowed to remain with us, and it was not until late in the afternoon that incipient meteorological improvements seemed to call for a hurried breakfast. Five p.m. found us foregathered at the foot of our buttress, for which we would suggest the name of North Buttress, and North Ridge for the ridge above it.’ Ward and Gibson first encounter an oblique gully before they came to the large stone they named the Capstan: ‘We hoped that a direct climb might be made from this point, but leaving the exploration of this for the morrow, Mr. Gibson led me somewhat to the left of a series of grass ledges.’ The next morning (23rd April), found the two climbers ‘struggling up to Llyn Bochllwyd in a seething snow-storm, with but small hopes of accomplishing the direct ascent, but as we neared the crags, the veil was rent, the curtains lifted; tattered wisps of cloud soared aloft on the driving wind and stately bastions took form before our eyes; they hung for a moment in misty drapery, smoking wreaths entwined black pinnacles, torn streamers clung round them; then these, too, were dashed aside, and the sun, so long concealed from view, blazed suddenly forth and cast its lustrous beams on new-fallen snow.’ They rested for a short time beneath the Capstan stone before they made their ascent. They could see that three routes were visible and they struck out for the central one and encountered a 40 ft chimney, ‘the first 20 ft’ ward says, he ‘took partly by back and knee, and partly as a face-climb’ but finding that he could go no further, had to descend and make a ‘variation route’ to avoid the chimney. Ward and Gibson then successfully made the first direct ascent of Glyder Fach, ‘we built a substantial cairn above this point, which marks the summit of the buttress and the beginning of the North Ridge.’ (8)

It was whilst climbing at Wastdale Head in the winter of 1908 that Ward met Aleister Crowley and Crowley, himself a passionate climber, recognised a man of great potential who had a brilliant logical mind and a thirst for the spiritual; Crowley wasted no time in introducing Ward to Victor Neuburg of Trinity College, who was also in residence at Cambridge. Neuburg and Ward became good friends and Ward joined Neuburg’s Pan Society, a poetry group where no doubt he met Neuburg’s friends, including Norman Mudd (1889-1934), another Trinity man studying mathematics.

Victor Neuburg dedicated his poem, ‘The Thinker’ in his first volume of poetry, The Triumph of Pan (1909) to Kenneth Martin Ward (p. 39):

The wind-swept summit of the mount Despair
He has reached, and now he sees the grey clouds run
Earthward to melt to tears; he sees the sun
Gray-glimmering through the dull, cold, murky air.
And still no voice comes to him, waiting there,
Waiting until he knows not what be done,
But something, something,… Hush! the voice of one
Comes to him, in his vast unuttered prayer.
 
Pain of Desire!... Joy, hope and life; these three
Are his; he heeds them not, he passes by
Under the wild, waste, unforgetting sky
To the old glamorous, mysterious past.
Ah! he shall wake where he hath striven to be,
Alone with the unborn, at last! at last!

Ward formed, with other undergraduates, such as Neuburg, Gerald Pinsent (1888-1976) [Trinity College] and Norman Mudd, The Cambridge University Freethought Association [CUFA] in which Ward was President. Crowley had attended Cambridge to give several talks to the Pan Society and Ward invited Crowley to give a ‘stirring speech towards the end of term’ [Lent term 1909 which ended in March] (9).

Kenneth Ward became a probationer of Crowley’s A.A., the third to do so, on 25th May 1909 taking the motto: ‘Laiada I Maelperegi’ which is Enochian for the ‘Secret is/in Fire’; on his Probationer’s Oath, Crowley had written ‘Underwent Vision of the Demon Crowley’ while passing to the grade of Neophyte. [Kaczynski. p. 137]

Ward travelled with Victor Neuburg from Cambridge to Boleskine House in Inverness where Crowley lived, arriving on Wednesday 16th June 1909; Neuburg went to undergo a magical retirement and Ward went specifically to borrow Crowley’s skis. Crowley had difficulty locating the skis but on Monday 28th June not only did he find the skis, but also the Elemental Watchtower tablets he had been searching for but most importantly the manuscript of Liber Al vel Legis – The Book of the Law, which was thought irretrievably lost. It was a day to change the course of Crowley’s life forever and Ward had been instrumental in its cause.

However, Kenneth Ward began to question Crowley’s character and became disillusioned by magick and finally broke away from his magical system of training in 1911 and accepted an appointment in Burma, at Rangoon College to lecture as a Professor of physics and mathematics.

In Burma Ward became a member of the Burma Research Society (founded 1910), attending meetings and publishing various articles in their journal – ‘Buddhism and Bergsonism and U Shwe Zan Aung versus Dr. Ross’ by Prof. K. M. Ward, and ‘Anatta: The Doctrine of “No-Ego”,’ by Prof. K. M. Ward (10). On the night of Thursday 29th August 1918, Ward read a paper at Rangoon College entitled ‘The Greater Temples of Pagan’ by Professor G. H. Luce of Rangoon College, who was absent due to military duty in India. Professor Luce was Gordon Hannington Luce, CBE, D.Litt., (1889-1979) who went up to Emmanuel College, Cambridge (as did Ward) where he became a Cambridge Apostle and friend to many artists and writers of the Bloomsbury Group such as Rupert Brooke (1887-1915), James Elroy Flecker (1884-1915), Aldous Huxley (1894-1963) E. M. Forster (1879-1970), Duncan Grant (1885-1978), R. C. Trevelyan (1872-1951) and John Maynard Keynes (1883-1946); he left Cambridge in 1911 with a first in Classics and the following year was appointed Lecturer in English Literature at the Government College, in Rangoon. Luce was an authority of Burmese art, architecture and archaeology and was a member of the Burmese Art Club and he published several distinguished volumes on Burmese cultural history and like Ward, shared a love of temple architecture. (11)

In 1923 Ward was elected Vice President of the Committee of the Burma Research Society. Another passion of Ward’s was painting and in 1913 he helped to establish the Burma Art Club (BAC) in Rangoon with A. Martin Jones, a railway official and an artist who taught anatomy of the human figure (he was also a rather good cartoonist) who became Chairman of BAC and Edward Gerard Noel Kinch, born in Oxfordshire in 1887 (died Middlesex 1952); Kinch, a fine illustrator, of Christ’s Hospital and Kelham Theological College, became Assistant Master at St. Edward’s School in Oxford before he came to Rangoon to do missionary work and became Principle of Saint Matthew Teacher Training College in Burma. At the Burma Art Club Ward, who became its first President and also taught at the Boys Buddhist School, taught oil painting and became mentor to several young artists who went on to become established artists; one adolescent artist, U San Win (1905-1981) showed such promise as a painter that Ward adopted him as a son – ‘San Win was already living with Ward in fact, when Ward first encountered Ba Nyan.’ (12) U Ba Nyan (1897-1945) studied under Ward and had his first exhibition of his work at the Club Exhibition of 1915; during the holiday season Ward would often travel with his young painting disciples to Bagan, Mandalay and Than Daung town near Taungoo to practice their painting techniques. Ba Nyan’s work showed a distinct appreciation of impressionism and he later came to England to study at Goldsmith’s College and the Royal College of Art in 1921; other young acolytes of Ward include: U Thar Dun (1899-1974) an architect and Secretary of the Burma Art Club who often visited Ward who in turn showed great kindness, as did he to all his young protégés of the Burma Art Club; also U Ba Zaw (1891-1942) who also studied at the Royal College of Art. Ward, along with A. R. Morris, the headmaster of the Institute of Technology at Insein (engineering school), took a great interest in Ba Zaw and they intended to send him to Bombay to study art, but it was postponed as Ba Zaw wanted to complete his B.A. degree then along came war which changed their plans. Ill health saw Ba Zaw take a teaching role in art at St. Paul’s High School in Rangoon, yet he went on to become an influential artist.

The Burma Art Club presented their art works at the annual Burma Art and Handicraft Exhibition (which ran all week) at the Jubilee Hall in Rangoon on 23rd January 1923 and ‘the gold medal this year has been awarded to K. M. Ward.’ (13)

The death of Kenneth Martin Ward came as a shock to many of his friends and family and at an Executive Committee meeting of the Burma Research Society at University College, Rangoon on Tuesday 20th September 1927, at 6.30 p.m., Ward’s friend and fellow scholar, Professor Gordon Luce, ‘on behalf of Mrs. Ward, presented books belonging to her deceased son Prof. Ward to the Society and the Secretary was instructed to make suitable acknowledgement for the gift.’ His obituary said that ‘by the death of Prof. K. M. Ward the Society lost one of its oldest and more energetic members’ and that he was ‘on the Executive Committee since the inception of the Society.’ Thanks were given to ‘Mrs Ward for her gift of 30 books presented in memory of her son, the late Prof. K. M. Ward’ (14) Also, the ‘paintings of the late Prof. K. M. Ward were also donated by his sister, Mrs. H. M. Lawson Dodd’ to the Burmese Cultural Mission. (15)

 

North Wales Climber’s Tragic End in London

 

The death of Mr. Kenneth Martin Ward, 39, of Berrylands, Beaconsfield, Bucks, Professor of Physics at Rangoon University, was inquired into by Sir Walter Schroder at Hampstead on Friday [4th February]. Mr. Ward came home from Rangoon last April on sick leave, and was treated at the Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Endsleigh Gardens, Euston Road, and at King’s College Hospital. He was told that nothing could be done for him, and in December he went to the Christian Science Nursing Home, Strathray Gardens, N. W. where he died on Tuesday [1st February]. Mrs. Ellen Winifred Moir, principal of the nursing home, said that when Mr. Ward arrived there he was very weak and emaciated. He kept to bed and declined medical advice. He refused solid food and only took milk. The coroner: Did Mr. Ward ask for a doctor? Witness: No. He said that the English doctors did not understand him. Dr. R. M. Bronte, pathologist, who made an examination of the body, stated that the spleen weighed 20lbs. If the malady had been diagnosed earlier something might have been done for Mr. Ward, but nothing could be done in the later stages. The coroner recorded a verdict of death from natural causes. [Northwich Chronicle. Saturday 12th February 1927. p. 2]

Also, from the same newspaper, we have this interesting reminiscence of Ward from an unidentified correspondent: ‘Kenneth Ward, as we called him, was camping out in a tent under Lliwedd when I first met him fifteen years ago [1912]. He was there, climbing the peak beloved of successive generations of intrepid men, contemporaries of Professor Farmer, F. Aldons and Canon Williams, of Lampeter. A strapping fellow of over six feet, Ward was son of Professor Ward, of Cambridge University, and himself a first-class man in Physics. He told me he had received an appointment at Rangoon, and was going there for four years until he had earned sufficient to print a book he had written on physics. He was a weird fellow with his mysticism and his daring. Speaking one day to me of a new climb he said: “And then I got to ‘Thank God Hole’,” and everything “was simple.” I said who christened a finger hold ‘Thank God Hole?’ When he laughingly explained that a fellow climbing a new way up had got into a tight place and was searching for a hold for his fingers when he discovered a depression in the rock the size of an egg cup. He got three fingers into it, and with an earnest prayer of “Thank God” hauled himself up into safety, and ever afterwards, said Ward, it was christened “Thank God Hole”. Ward was as hard as nails. His tent was in a remote spot just beneath the cross raised to the memory of Salt, who was killed on Lliwedd. He slept on a plank over a stream, and he declared that the bubbling of the water lulled him to sleep. The previous night, however, a thunderstorm broke over Snowdon, the spring became a raging torrent, and Ward and his tent and his plank bed were all swept away. That explains why he came up hatless and clad only in trousers and flannel shirt to breakfast with me at the Penypass Hotel. Alas, poor Ward! He was an amazingly clever fellow, full of the richest conglomeration of beliefs, as simple as a child and as strong as a giant. And yet the East reduced him to such a condition that he had to crawl into the Christian Science Nursing Home to die.’ (p. 2)

Following the death of her son in 1927, Mary Ward wrote and published a Memoir of Kenneth Martin Ward, two years after he died, in 1929. It is a fine testament from a mother to a son, and of his brief dalliance with Crowley and his magical group, she says that some of his ‘sad and bad’ experimental pleasures of 1909, ‘consisted of eating hashish, hypnotizing themselves, and each other, and practicing what they called magic.’ (16) There is also a rather excellent review of the volume in The Hibbert Journal of 1929-1930, which I make no excuse for reproducing:

‘Kenneth Ward was the only son of James Ward. He was born in 1887 and died on February 1, 1927, at the early age of thirty-nine years, some two years after the decease of his father. Mrs. Ward gives a delightful account of his childhood days, of his school life at Oundle, and of his undergraduate career at Cambridge, where he obtained a scholarship for physics and chemistry in 1905. Whilst an undergraduate he was a zealous climber, and spent part of his vacations ascending difficult peaks in Wales and in the Lake District. He graduated in the Mathematical Tripos in 1908, and took Part II in Physics in 1910. In the following year he went to Burma to occupy the chair of Mathematics and Physics at Rangoon College, which later became the centre of an independent Burman University; and here he continued teaching until the beginning of 1926, when, on account of ill-health, he returned to England.

What Mrs. Ward has to tell of his work for the education and the regeneration of the Burmese people is full of significance at the present time. He started a new style of teaching in his own department and made a success of it, discarding in his classes the text-books which had been used for mere cramming, and proceeding by what he called “toys” – little mechanical contrivances rigged up on a table – to practical demonstration of some of the elementary facts of physics. His ruling aim was to provide a greater freedom of choice for and to elicit the interest of the pupil, to make more of manual training and observational work, in order to foster initiative and develop a keener sense of responsibility.” It is only desirable,” he wrote, “that everyone should be able to think – each in his own line, and for the good of the community.” A cherished object of his was to make Art one of the subjects for the degree and to institute a chair of Art in the University. He was himself a landscape painter of considerable skill. “He felt that it was in Art that the slumbering soul of the people would find meet expression – some such expression as it had found centuries ago in the temples and palaces, now in ruins, with their wonderful domes and towers and matchless decorations.”

What originally induced Kenneth Ward to accept the Burma appointment was the opportunity he hoped it would afford him of studying Buddhism. He was drawn to Buddhistic literature by the conviction that it would contribute to an understanding of the great philosophies and religions of the world, and by an anticipation that it would prove to be more or less in harmony with those of Blake’s utterances which seemed to him to convey a true conception of the universe as spiritual. In his later years he was engaged upon a work to be entitled The Living Universe, wherein he was attempting to bring out the “true inwardness” of Buddhism and to show its oneness in essence with the religion of Christ and with modern metaphysical thought. This book, part of which it is hoped may be published, was largely based upon his father’s psychological and philosophical principles. Although on certain crucial matters he differed from his father’s views. While, for example, his faith in a principle of Good was strong and unyielding, he did not take kindly to the idea of a personal Deity; and he was critical of the conception of a “pure ego,” as a distinct and separate entity which attends to and feels towards presentations. These and other points of difference Mrs. Ward dwells upon in her memoir, and they cannot fail to interest those familiar with his father’s writings. Above all, one lays down the memoir grateful for the portraiture it conveys of a singularly sincere and earnest truth-seeker, bent, as he himself expressed it, upon doing something towards uniting the great world religions on a philosophic basis, and towards revealing the spiritual significance of Art. “He was,” writes one of his colleagues, “not only the best man, but the greatest spiritual force I have ever known. He succeeded in disciplining himself into constant realisation of Truth, whenever apprehended, and to act exactly as he knew to be best.”’ (17)

But perhaps the following words by Kenneth’s great friend, Frank Kingdon-Ward, best describe the man and the boy:

‘Kenneth was the most lovable boy on a camping trip, or a paper chase, or a boating excursion, or any escapade, because he was always cheerful, helpful and good-natured; and his capacity for forgiving others and turning away anger was simply unlimited… He was the heart and soul of all our undertakings and the originator of most of the fun.

… Boy or man, I do not think he ever did a mean thing… Most boys have a touch of barbarism in their composition, and very many even a streak of cruelty. Kenneth had neither; he was human in thought and deed… And as a boy he had an unusual insight into social and political problems … He was right-minded on the topics of the day. What was more, he had the rare moral courage – rare among boys – to maintain views which were jeered at and regarded as rank heresy by his companions.’(18)

 

 

NOTES:

 

  1. James Ward was born in Kingston-Upon-Hull on 27th January 1843. He published several volumes on Philosophy and Psychology including: Naturalism and Agnosticism. New York. Macmillan Company (1899); Philosophical Orientation and Scientific Standpoints [the Annual Public Address before the Union, 26th August 1904 (a reprint from the University Chronicle for September 1904)]. Berkeley. The University Press. 1904; The Realm of Ends or Pluralism and Theism [Gifford Lectures delivered in the University of St. Andrews in the years 1907-1910]. London. Cambridge University Press (1911); Heredity and Memory [being the Henry Sidgwick Memorial Lecture, delivered at Newnham College, 9th November 1912]. London. Cambridge University Press (1913); Psychological Principles. London. Cambridge University Press (1918); A Study of Kant. London. Cambridge University Press (1922); Psychology Applied to Education: a series of lectures on the theory and practice of education] by the late James Ward, edited by G. Dawes Hicks, M.A., PH.D, Litt. D., Professor of Philosophy in University College, London. London. Cambridge University Press. 1926 and Essays in Philosophy, with a Memoir of the Author by Olwen Ward Campbell [daughter]. London. Cambridge University Press (1927); there is also a fine work on Ward – The Philosophy of James Ward by Andrew Howson Murray. London. Cambridge University Press (1937). Professor James Ward died in Cambridge on 4th March 1925.
  2. Mary Jane Martin, known as ‘Minnie’ was born in Armagh, Ireland on 6th June 1851. She published a two-act play, ‘Man and Woman: The Question of the Day’ (performed in 1908) in 1911. Mary died on 14th March 1933 in Caldy, the Wirral.
  3. Hilda Margery Ward, born 10th October 1885, married Frederick Lawson Dodd, M.E.C.S. (Eng.), L.E.C.P. (Lond.), L.D.S. (Eng.), (1868-1962), [son of the well-known Tunbridge Wells artist, Charles Tattershall Dodd (1815-1878)] a dental surgeon of 41, Wimpole Street, London and Grosvenor Lodge, Tunbridge Wells, at St. Mary’s the Great Church, Cambridge on 18th November 1909; they had a daughter named Evelyn Margery Lawson Dodd (1911-2002) who married John Franklin Bradley (1910-1964) in Hampstead in May 1964; and a daughter named Hester Frances Lawson Dodd, born 16th May 1913 in Hendon who died in Surrey in 1990. Frederick (who was educated at Tonbridge School from 1884-86) died on 27th November 1962 and Hilda died in Sutton, Surrey in 1975.
  4. Agnes Olwen Ward B.Litt., D.PH (Oxon), born in 1890, was also a poet and she had poems published in Cambridge Poets: 1900-1913, An Anthology by Aelfrida Tillyard. Cambridge. W. Heffer & Sons Ltd. 1913; the poems are: Song p. 204 and To a Lecturer p. 205. She also had poems published in the second Cambridge Poets: 1914-1920, An Anthology by Edward Lewis Davison. Cambridge. Heffer & Sons Ltd. 1920 – Enisled p. 44, To W. S. L. [Walter Savage Landor] p. 45, Unknown p. 46, Pursuit p. 47, Solvitur Acris Hiemps – April,1919, pp. 47-48 and The Black-Cap pp. 49-50. In Cambridge in 1912 she married the Scottish poet and Classics scholar, Archibald Young Campbell M.A. (1885-1958) of St. John’s College, Cambridge (1904-1907) who was Professor of Greek at the University of Liverpool and formerly a Fellow and Lecturer of St. John’s College, Cambridge; he was also included in Cambridge Poets (1920) before his wife, Olwen, and his poems are: The Panic p. 36, The First-born p. 37, The Cyprian’s Harbinger pp. 37-38, A Young Girl (1908) pp. 38-39, “8th April 1917 pp. 39-41 and The Two Pictures pp. 41-43. He published several works: Poems. Cambridge. W. Heffer & Sons Ltd. 1912; Horace: A New Interpretation. London. Methuen & Co. 1924 and The Agamemnon of Aeschylus. London. Hodder & Stoughton Ltd. [University Press of Liverpool] 1936. Agnes published works under the name Olwen Ward Campbell: Shelley and the Unromantics. London. Methuen & Co. 1924; Camilla’s Bouquet by ‘One of Her Guests’ [O. W. Campbell]. London. MacMillan. 1932; The Feminine Point of View. London. Williams & Norgate.1952; Thomas Love Peacock. London. Arthur Barker. 1953 and Mary Kingsley: A Victorian in the Jungle. London. Methuen & Co. 1957. Olwen and Archibald had the following children, all born in Cambridge: Laura M. Campbell, born 1918, Stella Clare J. Campbell born 1920 (died 2012) and Adrian Hugh W. Campbell born 1923. Olwen died in Surrey aged 69 in 1959. Poems from the Campbell family [Mary Ward, Archibald Young Campbell, Olwen Ward Campbell, Laura Campbell, Clare Campbell, Adrian Campbell and Catherine Campbell (Adrian’s daughter)] have been collected in a volume of verse: To Sing Out Sometimes – Poems of a Family. Cassandra Press. 1983.
  5. Frank Kingdon-Ward: The Last of the Great Plant Hunters. Charles Lyte. London. John Murray Ltd. 1989. pp. 6-7.
  6. Peterborough Standard. Saturday 4th August 1906, p.5. see also: Bicester Herald, Friday 3rd August 1906, p. 7; Stamford Mercury, Friday 3rd August 1906, p. 4 and the Manchester Courier, Friday 3rd August 1906, p. 13 and The Sketch: A Journal of Art and Activity, volume 55, Wednesday 15th August 1906, p. 136 which says that ‘Master Kenneth Martin Ward… son of Professor J. Ward, Professor of Mental Philosophy at Cambridge… has been sent down from Oundle School. He is a very clever boy, and has won a science scholarship at Emmanuel College, Cambridge.’ The scholarship was for ‘£40 for natural science’ awarded to ‘K. M. Ward, Oundle School’ [Nottingham Guardian. Monday 18th December 1905, p. 3, and London Daily News. Wednesday 27th December 1905, p. 4]
  7. Winifred Kingdon Ward, ‘The Flower Chief’, unpublished typescript, Royal Botanic Gardens, Archives, reference: FWK/2/25.
  8. The Climbers’ Club Journal, volume X, number 40, June 1908. Some Climbs on the North Buttress of Glyder Fach (April 22nd, 23rd, 1908) By K. M. Ward. pp. 121-126. see also: British Mountain Climbs. George Dixon Abraham. London. Mills & Boon Ltd. 1909. p. 224; Climbing in the Ogwen District. James Merriman Archer Thomson. London. Edward Arnold. 1910. p. 120 [Ogwen. Mike Bailey (Climbers’ Club Guides to Wales) 2nd ed. 2010] The Journal of the Fell and Rock Climbing Club of the English Lake District (volume 2, number 2, November 1911, p. 258, mentions K. M. Ward being present at a club meeting during New Year 1911 at Wasdale Head.
  9. Friendship in Doubt: Aleister Crowley, J. F. C. Fuller, Victor B. Neuburg & British Agnosticism. Richard Kaczynski. New York. Oxford University Press. 2024. p. 84. Kaczynski notes that the letters Crowley received from Ward were addressed to ‘Alice’, and signed by Ward as ‘Katie’ or ‘Kate’ but states that it is not clear why (pp. 91-92). Could it be a reference to Crowley’s sexuality and perhaps an intimation of Ward’s own sexual persuasion? Mere speculation of course, but there could also be a harmless reason for such subterfuge. The correspondence is held in the Yorke Collection [OS EE1] at the Warburg Institute, London. It is also worth noting that when Neuburg and Crowley’s poems appeared in Cambridge Poets: 1900-1913 (Cambridge. Heffer & Sons Ltd. 1913) included in the same volume was Kenneth’s sister Olwen’s poems pp. 204-205 (see note 4) and Kenneth’s Emmanuel College friend, Gordon H. Luce, pp. 104-106, who also had poems in the following edition of Cambridge Poets: 1914-1920 (1920), (see note 11)
  10. Buddhism and Bergsonism and U Shwe Zan Aung versus Dr. Ross by Prof. K. M. Ward. Journal of the Burma Research Society, volume 8, part III, December 1918. Notes and Reviews. pp. 263-270 [also the meeting in which Ward read ‘The Greater Temples of Pagan’, pp. 289-290]; Anata: the Doctrine of “No Ego” by Prof. K. M. Ward. Journal of the Burma Research society, volume 9, part II, August 1919. pp. 97-102. Other Committee meetings of the Burma Research Society which Ward attended were: Friday 29th August 1919, 8 a.m.; Thursday 26th February 1920, 8.30 a.m.; Tuesday 16th March 1920, 8.30 a.m.; 5th August 1921; 12th November 1921; 29th August 1924, 6.30 p.m. In the journals he is listed as Prof. K. M. Ward, B.A. until 1922 when he is Prof. K. M. Ward, M.A.; a lecture by Ward, ‘Right Conduct’ is featured in A Compilation of Lectures, edited by The Rangoon College Buddhist Association. Rangoon. Sun Press. 1914. p. 13.
  11. Gordon Hannington Luce, CBE, D. Litt., (1889-1979) of Emmanuel College, Cambridge had the following poems published in Cambridge Poets: 1900-1913, An Anthology. Aelfrida Tillyard. Cambridge. Heffer & Sons Ltd. 1913 – The Summer Cloud pp. 104-105 and On an Amorphous Blue Vase, with Flowers, etc., pp. 105-106; in the second edition of Cambridge Poets: 1914-1920. Edward Lewis Davison (1920) his poems are: Song of the Jurors pp. 128-129, Idola Tribus pp. 130-131 and Presbyopia pp. 131-132. Luce published a volume of poetry – Poems. London. Macmillan and Co. 1920 and was the author of many papers and essays on Burma, its arts and culture which were published in the Journal of the Burma Research Society and volumes such as: Old Burma – Early Pagan (3 vols). New York. J. J. Augustin. 1969-70, and Phases of Pre-Pagan Burma: Languages and History, volume 1. Oxford University Press. 1985 [volume 2 1986] Luce also knew Ward’s boyhood friend, Frank Kingdon Ward who often travelled to the East on plant hunting expeditions; Luce, ‘walked up Kanchenjunga with his friend the naturalist Kingdon Ward’. [In Memoriam Gordon Hannington Luce CBE, D. Litt. Part 1, by his son, John Luce. Artibus Asiae, volume 42, number 1, 1980, p.115]
  12. Burmese Painting: A Linear and Lateral History. Andrew Ranard. Silkworm Books. 2009. p. 153. see also: Mirrored in Wood: Burmese Art and Architecture. Irene Moilanen and Sergei Sergeevich Ozhegov.Bangkok.White Lotus Press. 1999. p. 162.
  13. The Pioneer Mail. 26th January 1923, p. 28.
  14. Journal of the Burma Research Society, volume 18, part I, 1928. Obituary p. x, thanks and acceptance of the books p. xii and p. xvii gives a list of the books owned by Ward and presented to the Society: Buddhist Essays by Paul Dahlke, translated from the German by Bhikkhu Silacara; The Way to Nirvana by Poussin; Buddhist Philosophy in India and Ceylon by A. B. Keith; Essays: Indian and Islamic by S. Khuda Bukhsh; Lays of Ancient India by R. C. Dutt; The Path of Purity, being a translation of Buddhaghosa’s Visuddhimagga by Pe Maung Tin; The Study of Patanjali by Surendranath Dasgupta; Compendium of Philosophy being a translation of the Abhidhammattha-Sangaha by Shwe Zan Aung; The Thirteen Principle Upanishads translated by R. E. Hume; Prolegomena to a History of Buddhist Philosophy by B. M. Barua; A Critical Examination of the Life of Mohammed by Syed Ameer Ali; Dialogues of the Buddha translated by T. W. Rhys Davids, 2 vols; The Travels of Fa-hsien (399-418 A.D.) or Records of the Buddhistic Kingdoms re-translated by H. A. Giles; The Expositor (Atthasalini) 2 vols, translated by T. W. Rhys Davids; A Buddhist Manual of Psychological Ethics translated from Dhamma-sangani by Mrs. Rhys Davids; The King of the Dark Chamber by Rabindranath Tagore; Religion and Modern India by Satis Chandra Roy; Essays on Chivalry and Romance by Sir Walter Scott; Buddhism in Translations by H. C. Warren; Buddhism Primitive and Present in Magadha and in Ceylon; The Renaissance in India by J. H. Cousins; Buddhism: a Study of the Buddhist Norm by Mrs. Rhys Davids; The Bhagavad-Gita or the Lord’s Song translated by Annie Besant; An Outline of Buddhism or Religion of Burma by Bhikkhu Ananda M.; Mahayana-sutralamkara, par Sylvain Levi, Tome II; Some Points in Buddhist Doctrine by Ledi Sadaw.
  15. Burma. Volume 8, issue 2, 1958. p. 37.
  16. Memoirs of Kenneth Martin Ward by Mrs. James Ward. London. Simpkin Marshall. 1929. p. 48 [also Kaczynski, p. 137]
  17. The Hibbert Journal, 1929-1930, volume 28, issue 4, pp. 742-744, a review by G. Dawes Hicks of University College, London.
  18. Charles Lyte. 1989. pp. 8-9.

 


 
The 14th Aethyr
 


BALLADE OF LAKELAND LOSS


What is this madness which unites us all? O
What loathsome thing keeps hearts long denied
The opportunities of love’s joys? Sorrows grow
In endless circles growing ever wide…
Truth told, the elements of love have died
In empty heart and now there’s nothing for it
But to let the heart rest and love reside
In restless brain to complain; I sighed – I’ll shun it!
 
So let us to the wilds of rugged Lakeland go
And wake dull Wainwright for our guide;
Linger long on Great Gable, climbing slow
By mindless muscle to ascend the mountainside
Like some lovelorn, fell-worn, weary bride
To meet thy Master upon the summit
And to his radiant soul, surrendered, collide…
These lips unkist in mountain mist, cried – I’ve done it!
 
Here, the limb ache of wandering will show
The disinterested pain of universal pride
Upon Catbells, Crinkle Crags and Scafell, to flow
From regions drear from which the soul can’t hide –
Here, where the old ones of the world have lied –
Heartache rich and real on rock face – dream upon it
For I’ve heard the music of the mountains and often spied
To nature’s cost her lyrics lost, I decide – I’ll hum it!
 
L’Envoi
 
And in despair the worldly warrior wends with woe
Climbs Skiddaw, Bowfell, Great End, Lingmell, to numb it –
The lament of Lakeland loss – O blow cruel wind blow
And choose this my fate to stay or go – I’ll plummet!
 
Barry Van-Asten

 

THE TENTH AETHYR
BY AUDRAREP

 

Following the publication of the second edition of the Equinox in September 1909, Aleister Crowley and Victor Neuburg decided to go on a great magical retirement together, to Algiers. Crowley came upon the idea that they should explore the 30 Aethyrs using the Nineteen Enochian Calls or Keys as was obtained by Sir Edward Kelly and his scribe, John Dee; Crowley would act as seer and Neuburg would be his scribe, writing down the record of all that occurs. Crowley had already investigated the first two Aethyrs (30th & 29th) in Mexico on November 14th and 17th 1900 [see The Temple of Solomon the King, The Equinox volume I, number III, 1909 p. 269]

They reached Algiers on Wednesday 17th November 1909 and from there two days later on Friday 19th they left by tramway for L’Arba. On Sunday 21st November they reach Aumale having spent two nights sleeping in the open and one night in a hotel; at Aumale they purchase provisions, including several notebooks (1); at Aumale the following day, they made their preparations and explored the 28th Aethyr between 8-9 p.m. They left Aumale on Wednesday 24th November and continued their journey towards Bou-Saada, stopping at Ain-El-Hadjel on Friday 26th November [24th Aethyr], Ain Khermane the next day [Saturday 27th November] and on Tuesday 30th November they arrive at Bou-Saada.

They had climbed Daleh Addin, a mountain in the desert near Bou-Saada and ‘on the afternoon of [Friday] December 3rd I invoked the fourteenth Aethyr. Here was a veil so black and thick that I could not pass through. I tore off layer after layer with desperate effort, while in my ears there pealed a solemn voice. It spoke of me as dead.’ Crowley then says that he ‘prepared to return to the city’ but ‘suddenly came the command to perform a magical ceremony on the summit. We accordingly took loose rocks and built a great circle, inscribed with the words of power; and in the midst we erected an altar and there I sacrificed myself.’ Crowley is here referring to an act of sexual magick in which Neuburg took the active role with the intention of removing ‘certain conceptions of conduct’ which still lay within the magician’s heart so that he may cross the Abyss.

The Abyss is a void ‘empty of being; it is filled with all possible forms, each equally inane, each therefore evil in the only true sense of the word – that is meaningless but malignant, insofar as it craves to become real.’ Victor Neuburg must have been quite an extraordinary sight with his head shaved except for two tufts of hair, dyed red and shaped to resemble horns; Crowley sacrificed himself beneath the sun upon the altar to Neuburg, who with his horns appeared as the great god Pan; the ‘fire of the all-seeing sun smote down upon the altar, consuming every particle of my personality.’ They returned to the 14th Aethyr later between 9.50 and 11.15 p.m.

On Monday 6th December, Crowley and Neuburg went far from the city into a hollow among the dunes to evoke the tenth Aethyr and they made a ‘Circle to protect the scribe [Neuburg], and a Triangle wherein the Abyss might manifest sensibly.’ Crowley sacrificed three pigeons, one in each corner of the triangle, being especially careful not to spill one drop outside the triangle boundary.

The name of the Dweller of the Abyss is Choronzon, a mighty demon who appeared to Neuburg in many physical forms within the triangle; Crowley, we are told, sat apart separately having retired to a secret place, where is neither sight nor hearing, in his black robe with his hood drawn over his face, seated in the ‘Thunderbolt’ asana. In his 1909 Algerian Diary, Crowley merely says that ‘on the 6th we did the terrible 10th Aethyr, wherein was that mighty devil Choronzon brought to visible appearance by the power of the holy call and the due rites.’ There is much confusion and controversy concerning the tenth Aethyr because the participants do not state plainly where Crowley was physically situated during the ceremony; some believe he was in the triangle and others believe he was without. Here we have Lawrence Sutin’s lone voice in the wilderness who asks in his ‘Do What Thou Wilt: A Life of Aleister Crowley [New York. St Martin’s Press. 2000. p. 204]: ‘who was the “naked savage” who lunged at Neuburg? The most reasonable explanation is that it was Crowley possessed. But the realm of magical theory allows for the possibility that a materialisation – that is, a visible manifestation created through the exercise of their joint wills – had been achieved by Crowley and Neuburg. Neuburg was, Crowley later avowed, “a materializing medium in the strictest sense; that is, he could condense ideas into sensible forms. […] In his presence I found it quite easy to produce phenomenal phantasms of almost any idea, from gods to demons, which I happened to need at the moment.” Sutin is of course correct in assuming that the combined forces of the magical practitioners are able to produce and form into visible appearance an entity or an ‘evoked idea’ in a confined and consecrated space. Sutin continues, saying ‘with respect to the Tenth Aethyr attack by Choronzon, Crowley explained it as one of the “successive phantoms” formed by “the energy latent in the blood of the pigeons” that had been sacrificed when the triangle was first consecrated. For his part, Neuburg remained convinced for the rest of his life that he had wrestled with a demon in the desert.’ There has also been the suggestion that Crowley exuded some form of ectoplasm to give shape to the demon which to me seems pure nonsense, as Crowley was not a physical medium.

Arthur Calder-Marshall in his autobiographical volume ‘The Magic of My Youth’ [London. Rupert Hart-Davis.1951, chapter I: The Poet], an amusing little book which has some fine descriptions of Neuburg, produces some fairy tale about Neuburg being turned into a zebra and ridden by Crowley to Alexandria and sold to a zoo! (p. 31) The tale seems to have amused Neuburg, with whom Calder-Marshall was on friendly terms, and the former goes on to explain that he and Crowley did not, in fact, draw a circle in the desert, but a pentacle, and that they conjured and talked to a spirit who wished to be known as P.472, ‘a foreman builder from Ur of the Chaldees, still earthbound.” (p. 35) Neuburg was known to have had a splendid and child-like sense of humour and we can automatically dismiss this as not only Neuburg creating further mystery but remaining obedient in keeping silent about the rite; that’s not to say there may be some small element of truth in it and that a spirit calling itself ‘P.472’ made contact but was seen as insignificant and unworthy of recording; the story also contradicts the original version of Liber 418 which in Thelemic lore is second only in its authenticity to the Book of the Law – thus Calder-Marshall is unreliable in relating accurate evidence concerning the tenth Aethyr.

Crowley is purposefully vague about the actual series of events and his whereabouts during the ceremony. If we turn to the actual notebook, we can see that on the reverse of the last page of the 11th Aethyr (which is numbered page ‘20’ in the top right hand side) of [Sunday] 5th December 1909, there is a diagram showing the position of the sun and the Triangle and the Circle – this is in fact the last page in the notebook before the pages of the 10th Aethyr were torn out and so opposite the diagram the notebook continues with the 9th Aethyr [the loose pages were placed in the notebook where they had been torn out and it seems evident that some pages were removed and not put back] – in the Circle we can clearly see the word ‘Scribe’ where Neuburg will be during the ceremony, surrounded by the Holy Names, and in the Triangle we also distinctly see the word ‘Seer’ in its centre. I should say this is evidence enough of where Crowley is positioned during the ceremony. If Crowley is indeed in the Triangle then why is there a need to sacrifice the pigeons if Crowley is acting as the material basis? It is perhaps consistent that the energy of the blood is vitalised and used up by the manifesting entity to give some subtle semblance of form to which Neuburg with his mediumistic abilities would quite easily distinguish.

As further evidence, we can see in Liber CCCXXV, the evocation of that mighty spirit of Mars, Bartzabel, that the same proportional Circle and Triangle was used as in the tenth Aethyr. During the evocation, which occurred the following year after the Vision and the Voice, at Rempstone Hall in Dorset, the home of Commander Guy Marston [Royal Navy] (1871-1928) on Monday 9th May 1910, we have the following words by Crowley in the Introduction: ‘In the Triangle was Frater Omnia Vincam, [Victor Neuburg] to serve as a material basis through which the spirit might manifest. Here was a startling innovation in tradition.’ This is just five months after the tenth Aethyr in December 1909 and Crowley states it clearly that Neuburg, (as did Crowley for the tenth Aethyr), is within the Triangle of Art with the names around it: PRIMEUMATON, ANAPHAXETON and ANAPHANETON and MI-CA-EL within in the angles; also within is the sigil of Bartzabel and his name in Hebrew, which for me is confirmation enough.

It seems apparent then that Crowley and Choronzon are occupying the same space within the Triangle, but what of Neuburg stating that Frater Perdurabo was ‘seated in a secret place covered completely by a black robe, in the position called the “Thunderbolt”. He did not move or speak during the ceremony.’ This is where much of the misconception as to Crowley’s actual positioning during the ceremony stems from as it seems to imply that Crowley has placed himself apart from the working area in a ‘secret place’ where he cannot see or hear the unfolding ceremony. I believe, and many scholars also believe, that Crowley is in fact in the Triangle in his black robe in his Thunderbolt asana holding his golden topaz to his brow; the ‘secret place’ Neuburg speaks of is Crowley’s consciousness, his astral body, which has fled the physical body into a very deep meditation known as Samadhi. The topaz stone set into the intersection of his wooden Calvary Cross painted vermillion – the cross of six squares engraved with the Greek Cross of five squares and the Rose of forty-nine petals – acts as a focal point during the skrying of the Aethyr and any words Crowley speaks from the Triangle are recorded by the Scribe in the Circle. How then can Neuburg say that Crowley ‘did not move or speak during the ceremony’?

We must then assume that it is Crowley, inhabited by Choronzon, who is physically throwing sand into the circle to cover the consecrated boundary (2) and Crowley, naked, having disrobed, who leaps upon Neuburg having gained entrance to the circle; Neuburg has been warned to defend the circle with the dagger even if the form of Crowley enters it and this he does, forcing the demon (Crowley) back into the Triangle. It is also we presume Crowley who begs for water from the Triangle and for ‘the shirt of the Frater Perdurabo’ as it states in the notebook, to which Crowley changed to ‘wherewith to cover his nakedness’.

We are told that the purpose of encountering Choronzon and crossing the Abyss is the destruction of the ego to become a Master of the Temple – it should be noted here that the dissolution of the ego would result in a state of unbalanced equilibrium and therefore I suggest it is not the destruction of the ego the adept is aiming towards achieving but a different point of psychological perspective or view of the self; a less centred dominance in which the ego is no longer the axis of conscious being [Hadit] but the outermost circumference [Nuit].

Although Crowley does not specifically mention any form of drug use during the Aethyrs it cannot be ruled out as Crowley had much experience in the use of hashish and other drugs such as mescaline during ritual workings. It should not then be overlooked as near the beginning of the ceremony Neuburg plainly says of himself that he is ‘halucinated’ after Crowley says: ‘I don’t think I can get any more; I think that’s all there is.’

Crowley considered drugs a useful and important factor in opening the mind to visionary experiences and almost any creative and imaginative soul, entering the desert alone or with a magical partner having previously taken hashish prior to performing a ritual would have some form of intense and lucid visionary experience according to their mindful perspective and probably come away changed, thinking they had attained wisdom, drank the tears of God and looked upon His Glory, or become insane, their mind fragmented and dispersed unto the wind! Of course, someone of a non-magical vibration may have a very different outcome altogether but it would take a very courageous yet dull simpleton to place themselves in the triangle and open themselves up to demonic forces which they could not withstand.

The record of the tenth Aethyr which was removed from the notebook has this phrase at the end of the rite: ‘The Aethyr was edited & revised on the following day.’ This sentence is obviously written into the notebook either on the following day [Tuesday 7th December] or sometime after; much of the editing is clear to determine as Crowley mostly uses pencil for his additions, annotations and corrections. The main body of the writing is in black ink – in the Note by Scribe Neuburg switches from black ink to blue ink which may have been added the following day also [after the ceremony both men were exhausted and had to get back to Bou-Saada, perhaps overtaken with sleep, the editing of the Aethyr would have occurred the following morning as the next Aethyr (9th) took place between 9.30 and 11.10 p.m. on that night, Thursday 7th December]

On Tuesday 14th December, Crowley and Neuburg arrived at Bordj-an-Nus in the desert between Tolga and Biskra. On that day or soon after, Crowley probably penned the poem of the same name perhaps following some homosexual liaison or desire in that direction. Crowley published his poem ‘At Bordj-an-Nus’ in The Equinox, volume 1, number IV, 1910 (p. 37) under the pseudonym Hilda Norfolk; the poem is an enchanting homoerotic song of an encounter with an Arab:

 

EL ARABI! El Arabi! Burn in thy brilliance, mine own!
O Beautiful! O Barbarous! Seductive as a serpent is
That poises head and hood, and makes his body tremble to the drone
Of tom-tom and of cymbal wooed by love’s assassin sorceries!
El Arabi! El Arabi!
The moon is down; we are alone;
May not our mouths meet, madden, mix, melt in the starlight of a kiss?
El Arabi!
 
There by the palms, the desert’s edge, I drew thee to my heart and held
Thy shy slim beauty for a splendid second; and fell moaning back,
Smitten by Love’s forked flashing rod – as if the uprooted mandrake yelled!
As if I had seen God, and died! I thirst! I writhe upon the rack!
El Arabi! El Arabi!
It is not love! I am compelled
By some fierce fate, a vulture poised, heaven’s single ominous speck of black.
El Arabi!
 
There in the lonely bordj (3) across the dreadful lines of sleeping men,
Swart sons of the Sahara, thou didst writhe slim, sinuous and swift,
Warning me with a viper’s hiss – and was not death upon us then,
No bastard of thy maiden kiss? God’s grace, the all-surpassing gift!
El Arabi! El Arabi!
Yea, death is man’s Elixir when
Life’s pale wine foams and splashes over his imagination’s rim!
El Arabi!
 
El Arabi! El Arabi! witch-amber and obsidian
Thine eyes are, to ensorcell me, and leonine thy male caress.
Will not God grant us Paradise to end the music Earth began?
We play with loaded dice! He cannot choose but raise right hand to bless.
El Arabi! El Arabi!
Great is the love of God and man
While I am trembling in thine arms, wild wanderer of the wilderness!
El Arabi!

 

At Biskra they performed the 4th Aethyr ceremony between 9 and 10.30 p.m. on Thursday 16th December; the 3rd Aethyr on Friday 17th December (9.30-11.30 p.m.); the 2nd Aethyr on Saturday 18th December between 9.20-10.05 a.m. but there was some difficulty in this and so Crowley retired to the hot baths and springs of Hammam Salahin, an ancient Roman bath complex, where he continued the Aethyr from 10.15-11.52 a.m. The 1st Aethyr was attained on Sunday 19th December between 1.30 and 3.30 p.m. but Crowley had to go back to the 2nd Aethyr to complete it fully on Monday 20th December from 8.35-9.35 p.m.

Crowley and Neuburg made their way back to Algiers and from there left by boat on the last day of the year, Friday 31st December 1909, bound for Southampton.

The Aethyrs as they were recorded in the notebooks (4) were first published in The Equinox, volume 1, number V [March] 1911, as a Special Supplement – Liber XXX Aerumvel Seculi sub figura CCCCXVIII. Specifically the tenth Aethyr in this version of ‘The Oath’ does not have the final verse: ‘And I Summon mine Holy Guardian Angel’ etc,… ‘Amen’.

We can now look at the tenth Aethyr as it is recorded by Neuburg in the Notebook but first we must approach the Call or Key of the Thirty Aethyrs – the 19th Key. This call, in Enochian, opens the gate of each of the Aethyrs and the Seer [Crowley] recites the call within the triangle, as I believe we have established, prior to skrying with his topaz.

 

‘MADARIATZA das perifa [here insert the name of the Aethyr, for the tenth Aethyr: ZAX], cahisa micaolazoda saanire caosago od fifisa balzodizodarasa Iaida. Nonuca [soft ‘c’] gohulime: Micama adoianu MADA iaoda beliorebe, soba ooaona cahisa luciftias peripesol, das aberaasasa nonucafe netaaibe caosaji od tilabe adapehaheta damepelozoda, tooata nonucafe jimicalazodoma larasada tofejilo marebe yareryo IDOIGO; (5) od torezodulape yaodafe gohola, Caosaga, tabaoreda saanire, od caharisateosa yorepoila tiobela busadire, tilabe noalanu paida oresaba, od dodaremeni zodayolana. Elazodape tilaba paremeji peripesatza, od ta qurelesata booapisa. Lanibame oucaho sayomepe, od caharisateosa ajitoltorenu, mireca qo tiobela lela. Tonu paomebeba dizodalamo asa piano, od caharisateosa aji-la-tore-torenu paracahe a sayamepe. Coredazodizoda dodapala od fifalazoda, lasa manada, od faregita bamesa omaoasa.

Conisabera od auauotza tonuji oresa; catabela noasami tabejesa leuitahemonuji. Vanucahi omepetilabe oresa! Bagile? Moooahe OL coredazodizoda. El capimao itzomatzipe, od cacocasabe gosaa. Bajilenu pii tianuta a babalanuda, od faoregita teloca uo uime.

Madariiatza, torezodu!!! Oadariatza orocaha aboaperi! Tabaori periazoda aretabasa! Adarepanu coresata dobitza! Yolacame periazodi arecoazodiore, od quasabe qotinuji! Ripire paaotzata sagacore! Umela od peredazodare cacareji Aoiveae coremepeta! Torezodu! Zodacre od Zodameranu, asapeta sibesi butamona das surezodasa Tia balatanu.Odo cicale Qaa, od Ozodazodama pelapeli IADANAMADA!’

 

Translation:

 

‘O YE HEAVENS which dwell in the [insert, i.e. ‘tenth’] Aire, ye are mighty in the parts of the Earth, and execute therein the Judgement of the Highest! Unto you it is said: Behold the Face of your God, the beginning of Comfort, whose eyes are the brightness of the Heavens, which provided you for the Government of the Earth, and her unspeakable variety, furnishing you with the power of understanding to dispose all things according to the Foresight of Him that Sitteth on the Holy Throne, and rose up in the Beginning, saying: The Earth, let her be governed by her parts, and let there be Division in her, that the glory of her may be always ecstasy and irritation of orgasm. Her course, let it run with the Heavens; and as an handmaid let her serve them. One season, let it confound another, and let there be no creature upon or within her the same. All her members, let them differ in their qualities, and let there be no one Creature equal with another. The reasonable Creatures of the Earth, and Men, let them vex and weed out one another; and their dwelling-places, let them forget their Names. The work of man and his pomp, let them be defaced.

His building, let it be a Cave for the Beast of the Field! Confound her understanding with darkness! For why? it  repenteth me concerning the Virgin and the Man. One while let her be known, and another while a stranger: because she is the bed of an Harlot, and the dwelling-place of him that is fallen.

O ye Heavens, arise! The lower heavens beneath you, let them serve you! Govern those that govern! Cast down such as fall. Bring forth with those that increase, and destroy the rotten. No place let it remain in one number. Add and diminish until the stars be numbered. Arise! Move! and appear before the Covenant of His mouth, which He hath sworn unto us in His Justice. Open the Mysteries of your Creation, and make us partakers of THE UNDEFILED KNOWLEDGE.’

 

 

I    



Illustration 1:  The Circle and the Triangle

 

IN NOMINE BABALON
AMEN.
RESTRICTION UNTO CHORONZON.

 

This Aethyr being accursed, and the seer forewarned, he taketh these precautions for the scribe.

First let the scribe be seated in the centre of the circle in the desert sand, and let the circle be fortified by the Holy Names of God – Tetragrammaton and Shaddai El Chai and Ararita.

And let the Demon be invoked within a triangle, wherein is inscribed the name of Choronzon, and about it let him write ANAPHAXETON – ANAPHANETON – PRIMEUMATON, and in the angles MI-CA-EL: and at each angle the Seer shall slay a pigeon, and having done this, let him retire to a secret place, where is neither sight nor hearing, and sit within his black robe, secretly invoking the Aethyr. And let the Scribe perform the Banishing Rituals of the Pentagram and Hexagram, and let him call upon the Holy Names of God, and say the Exorcism of Honorius, (6) and let him beseech  protection and help of the Most High.

And let him be furnished with the Magick Dagger, and let him strike fearlessly at anything that may seek to break through the circle, were it the appearance of the Seer himself. And if the Demon pass out of the triangle, let him threaten him with the Dagger,and command him to return. And let him beware lest he himself lean beyond the circle. And since he reverenceth the Person of the Seer as his Teacher, let the Seer bind him with a great Oath to do this.

Now, then, the Seer being entered within the triangle, let him take the Victims and cut their throats, pouring the blood within the Triangle, and being most heedful that not one drop fall without the Triangle; or else Choronzon should be able to manifest in the universe.

And when the sand hath sucked up the blood of the victims, let him recite the Call of the Aethyr apart secretly as aforesaid. Then will the Vision be revealed, and the Voice heard.

 

THE OATH

 

I, Omnia Vincam, a Probationer of A.A., hereby solemnly promise upon my magical honour, and swear by Adonai the angel that guardeth me, that I will defend this magic circle of Art with thoughts and words and deeds. I promise to threaten with the Dagger and command back into the triangle the spirit incontinent, if he should strive to escape from it; and to strike with a Daggerat anything that may seek to enter this Circle, were it in appearance the body of the Seer himself. And I will be exceeding wary, armed against force and cunning; and I will preserve with my life the inviolability of this Circle, Amen.

And I summon mine Holy Guardian Angel to witness this mine oath, the which if I break, may I perish, forsaken of Him. Amen and Amen.

 

II    



Illustration 2: ‘the terror of darkness, and the blindness of night.’

 

THE CALL OF THE TENTH AETHYR THAT IS CALLED ZAX

 

There is no being in the outer-most Abyss, but constant forms come forth from the nothingness of it.

Then the Devil of the Aethyr, that mighty devil Choronzon, crieth aloud, Zazas, Zazas, Nasatanada Zazas.

I am the Master of Form, and from me all forms proceed.

I am I. I have shut my-self up from the spendthrifts, my gold is safe in my treasure-chamber, and (7) I have made every living thing my concubine, and none shall touch them, save only I. And yet I am scorched, even while I shiver in the wind. He hateth me and tormenteth me. He would have stolen me from myself, but I shut myself up and mock at him, even while he plagueth me. From me come leprosy and pox and plague and cancer and cholera and the failing sickness. Ah! I will reach up to the knees of the Most High, and tear his phallus with my teeth, and I will bray his testicles in a mortar, and make poison thereof, to slay the sons of men.

(Here the Spirit simulated the voice of Frater P., (8) which also appeared to come from his station and not from the triangle.)

I don’t think I can get any more; I think that’s all there is.

(The Frater was seated in a secret place covered completely by a black robe, in the position called the “Thunderbolt.” He did not move or speak during the ceremony.)

Next (9) the Scribe was hallucinated, believing that before him was a beautiful courtesan whom previously he had loved in Paris. Now, she wooed him with soft words and glances, but he knew these things for delusions of the devil, and he would not leave the circle.

The demon then laughed wildly and loud.

(Upon the Scribe threatening him, the Demon (10) proceeded, after a short delay.)

They have called me the God of laughter, and I laugh when I will slay. And they have thought that I could not smile, but I smile upon whom I would seduce, O inviolable one, that canst not be tempted. If thou canst command me by the power of the Most High, know that I did indeed tempt thee, and it repenteth me. I bow myself humbly before the great and terrible names whereby thou hast conjured and constrained me. But thy name is mercy, and I cry aloud for pardon. Let me come and put my head beneath thy feet, that I may serve thee. For if thou commandest me to obedience in the Holy names, I cannot swerve therefrom, for their first whispering is greater than the noise of all my tempests. (11) Bid me therefore come unto thee upon my hands and knees that I may adore thee, and partake of thy forgiveness. Is not thy mercy infinite?

(Here Choronzon attempts to seduce the Scribe by appealing to his pride.

But the Scribe refused to be tempted, and commanded the demon to continue with the Aethyr.

There was again a short delay.)

Choronzon hath no form, because he is the maker of all form; and so rapidly he changeth from one to the other as he may best think fit to seduce those whom he hateth, the servants of the Most High.

Thus taketh he the form of a beautiful woman, or of a wise and holy man, or of a serpent that writheth upon the earth ready to sting.

And, because he is himself, therefore he is no self; the terror darkness, and the blindness of night, and the deafness of the adder, and the tastelessness of stale and stagnant water, and the black fire of hatred, and the udders of the Cat of slime; (12) not one thing, but many things. Yet, with all that, his torment is eternal. The sun burns him as he writhes naked upon the sands of hell, and the wind cuts him bitterly to the bone, a harsh dry wind, so that he is sore athirst. Give unto me, I pray thee, one drop of water from the pure springs of Paradise, that I may quench my thirst.

(The Scribe refused.) (13)

Sprinkle water upon my head. I can hardly go on.

(This last was spoken from the triangle in the natural voice of the Frater, which Choronzon again simulated. But he did not succeed in taking the Frater’s form – which was absurd!

The Scribe resisted the appeal to his pity, and conjured the demon to proceed by the names of the Most High. Choronzon attempted also to seduce the faithfulness of the Scribe. (14) A long colloquy ensued. (15) The Scribe cursed him by the Holy names of God, and the power of the Pentagram.)

I feed upon the names of the Most High. I churn them in my jaws, and I void them from my fundament. I fear not the power of the Pentagram, for I am the Master of the Triangle. My name is three hundred and thirty and three, and that is thrice one. Be vigilant, therefore, for I warn thee that I am about to deceive thee. I shall say words that thou wilt take to be the cry of the Aethyr, and thou wilt write them down, thinking them to be great secrets of Magick power, and they will be only my jesting with thee.

(Here the Scribe invoked Angels, and the Holy Guardian Angel of the Frater Perdurabo. The demon replied:)

I know the name of the Angel of thee and thy brother Perdurabo, and all thy dealings with him are but a cloak for thy filthy sorceries.

(Here the Scribe averred that he knew more than the demon, and so feared him not, (16) and ordered the demon to proceed.)

Thou canst tell me naught that I know not, for in me is all Knowledge: Knowledge is my name. Is not the head of the great Serpent arisen into Knowledge?

(Here the Scribe again commanded Choronzon to continue with the call.)

Know thou that there is no Cry in the tenth Aethyr like unto the other Cries, for Choronzon is Dispersion, and cannot fix his mind upon any one thing for any length of time. Thou canst master him in argument, O talkative one; thou wast commanded, wast thou not, to talk to Choronzon? He sought not to enter the circle, or to leave the triangle, yet thou didst prate of all these things.

(Here the Scribe threatened the demon with anger and pain and hell. The demon replied:)

Thinkest thou, O fool, that there is any anger and any pain that I am not, or any hell but this my spirit?

Images, images, images, all without control, all without reason. The malice of Choronzon is not the malice of a being; it is the quality of malice, because he that boasteth himself “I am I,” hath in truth no self, and these are they that are fallen under my power, the slaves of the Blind One that boasteth himself to be the Enlightened One. For there is no centre, nay, nothing but Dispersion.

Woe, woe, woe, threefold to him that is led away by talk, O talkative One.

O thou that hast written two-and-thirty books of Wisdom, and art more stupid than an owl, by thine own talk is thy vigilance wearied, and by my talk art thou befooled and tricked, O thou that sayest that thou shalt endure. Knowest thou how nigh thou art to destruction? For thou that art the Scribe hast not the understanding (17) that alone availeth against Choronzon. And wert thou not protected by the Holy Names of God and the circle, I would rush upon thee and tear thee. For when I made myself like unto a beautiful woman, if thou hadst come to me, I would have rotted thy body with the pox, and thy liver with cancer, and I would have torn off thy testicles with my teeth. And if I had seduced thy pride, and thou hadst bidden me to come into the circle, I would have trampled thee under foot, and for a thousand years shouldst thou have been but one of the tape-worms that is in me. And if I had seduced thy pity, and thou hadst poured one drop of water without the circle, then would I have blasted thee with flame. But I was not able to prevail against thee.

How beautiful are the shadows of the ripples of the sand!
Would God that I were dead.

For know that I am proud and revengeful and lascivious, and I prate even as thou. For even as I walked among the Sons of God, I heard it said that Perdurabo could both will and know, and might learn at length to dare, but that to keep silence he should never learn. O thou that art so ready to speak, so slow to watch, thou art delivered over unto my power for this. And now one word was necessary unto me, and I could not speak it. I behold the beauty of the earth in her desolation, and greater far is mine, who sought to be my naked self. Knowest thou that in my soul is utmost fear? And such is my force and my cunning, that a hundred times have I been ready to leap, and for fear have missed. And a thousand times am I baulked by them of the City of the Pyramids, that set snares for my feet. More knowledge have I than the Most High, but my will is broken, and my fierceness is marred by fear, and I must ever speak, speak, speak, millions of mad voices in my brain.

With a heart of furious fancies,
Whereof I am Commander,
With a burning spear (18)
And a horse of Air
To the wilderness I wander.

(The idea was to keep the Scribe busy writing, so as to spring upon him. For, while the Scribe talked, Choronzon had thrown sand into the circle, and filled it up. But Choronzon could not think fast and continuously, and so resorted to the device of quotation.

The Scribe had written two or three words of “Tom o’ Bedlam,” when Choronzon sprang within the circle (that part of the circumference of which that was nearest to him he had been filling up with sand all this time), and leaped upon the Scribe, throwing him to the earth. The conflict took place within the circle. The Scribe called upon Tetragrammaton, and succeeding in compelling Choronzon to return into the triangle. By dint of anger and of threatening him with the Magick Staff did he accomplish this. He then repaired the circle. The discomfited demon now continued:)

All is dispersion. These are the qualities of things.
The tenth Aethyr is the world of adjectives, and there is no substance therein.
(Now returneth the beautiful woman who had before tempted the Scribe. She prevailed not.)
I am afraid of sunset, for Tum is more terrible than Ra, and Kephra the Beetle is greater than the Lion Mau.
I am a-cold.

(Here Choronzon wanted to leave the triangle to obtain (19) wherewith to cover his nakedness. The Scribe refused the request, threatening the demon. After a while the latter continued:)

I am commanded, why I know not, by him that speaketh. Were it thou, thou little fool, I would tear thee limb from limb. I would bite off thine ears and nose before I began with thee. I would take thy guts for fiddle-strings at the Black Sabbath.

Thou didst make a great fight there in the circle; thou art a goodly warrior!
(Then did the demon laugh loudly. The Scribe said: Thou canst not harm one hair of my head.)
I will pull out every hair of thy head, every hair of thy body, every hair of thy soul, one by one.

(Then said the Scribe: Thou hast no power.)

Yea, verily I have power over thee, for thou hast taken the Oath, and art bound unto the White Brothers, and therefore have I the power to torture thee so long as thou shalt be.

(Then said the Scribe unto him: Thou liest.)

Ask of thy brother Perdurabo, and he shall tell thee if I lie!

(This the Scribe refused to do, saying that it was no concern of the demon’s.)

I have prevailed against the Kingdom of the Father, and befouled his beard; and I have prevailed against the Kingdom of the Son, and torn off his Phallus; but against the Kingdom of the Holy Ghost shall I strive and not prevail. The three slain doves are my threefold blasphemy against him; but their blood shall make fertile the sand, and I writhe in blackness and horror of hate, and prevail not.

(Then the demon tried to make the Scribe laugh at Magick, and to think that it was all rubbish, that he might deny the names of God that he had invoked to protect him; which, if he had doubted but for an instant, he had leapt upon him, and gnawed through his spine at the neck.

Choronzon succeeded not in his design.)

In this Aethyr is neither beginning nor end, for it is all hotch-potch, because it is of the wicked on earth and the damned in hell. And so long as it be hotch-potch, it mattereth little what may be written by the sea-green incorruptible Scribe.

The horror of it will be given in another place and time, and through another Seer, and that Seer shall be slain as a result of his revealing. But the present Seer, who is not Perdurabo, seeth not the horror, because he is shut up, and hath no name.

(Now was there some further parleying betwixt the demon and the Scribe, concerning the departure and the writing of the word, the Scribe not knowing if it were meet that the demon should depart.

Then the Seer took the Holy Ring, and wrote the name BABALON, that is victory over ChURUNZON, (20) and he was no more manifest.)

(This cry was obtained on Dec. 6, 1909, between 2 and 4.15 P.M., in a lonely valley of fine sand, in the desert near Bou-Saada. The Aethyr was edited and revised on the following day.)

After the conclusion of the Ceremony, a great fire was kindled to purify the place, and the Circle and Triangle were destroyed.

 


Illustration 3: The Demon of Dispersion 

 

NOTE BY SCRIBE

 

Almost from the beginning of the ceremony was the Scribe over-shadowed, and he spoke a sit were in spite of himself, remembering afterwards scarcely a word of his speeches, some of which were long and seemingly eloquent. (21)

All the time he had a sense of being protected from Choronzon, and this sense of security prevented his knowing fear.

Several times did the Scribe threaten to put a curse upon the demon; but ever, before he uttered the words of the curse, did the demon obey him. For himself, he knoweth not the words of the curse.

Also (22) it is meet to record in this place that the Scribe several times whistled in a Magical manner, which never before had he attempted, and the demon was apparently much discomfited thereat.

Now knoweth the Scribe that he was wrong in holding much converse with the demon; for Choronzon, in the confusion and chaos of his thought, is much terrified by silence. And by silence can he be brought to obey.

For cunningly doth he talk of many things, going from subject to subject, and thus he misleadeth the unwary into argument with him. And though Choronzon be easily beaten in argument, yet, by disturbing the attention of him who would command him, doth he gain the victory.

For Choronzon feareth of all things concentration and silence he therefore who would command him should will in silence: thus (23) is he brought to obey.

This the Scribe knoweth; for that since the obtaining of the Accursed Tenth Aethyr, he hath held converse with Choronzon. And unexpectedly did he obtain the information he sought after having long refused to answer the demon’s speeches.

Choronzon is dispersion; (24) and such is his fear of concentration that he will obey rather than be subjected to it, or even behold it in another.

The account of the further dealings of Choronzon with the Scribe will be found in the Record of Omnia Vincam.

 

THE MAGICIAN


O Lord, deliver me from hell’s great fear and gloom!
Loose thou my spirit from the larvae of the tomb!
I seek them in their dread abodes without affright:
On them will I impose my will, the law of light.
 
I bid the night conceive the glittering hemisphere.
Arise, O sun, arise! O moon, shine white and clear!
I seek them in their dread abodes without affright:
On them will I impose my will, the law of light.
 
Their faces and their shapes are terrible and strange.
These devils by my might to angels I will change.
These nameless horrors I address without affright:
On them will I impose my will, the law of light.
 
These are the phantoms pale of mine astonied view,
Yet none but I their blasted beauty can renew;
For to the abyss of hell I plunge without affright:
On them will I impose my will, the law of light.

On the last day of the year, Friday 31st December, they left Algiers and set sail for Southampton.

 

illustrations: The Choronzon Triptych: I: The Circle and the Triangle, II: ‘the terror of darkness, and the blindness of night.’, III: The Demon of Dispersion. (Collage. 2026. Barry Van-Asten)

 

Notes:

  1. The following day after they arrived at Algiers, Thursday 18th November, was the eleventh anniversary of Crowley’s initiation into the Golden Dawn in 1898. There are six notebooks of French manufacture which was probably purchased at Aumale, Algeria; the notebooks contain the text in Neuburg’s hand with Crowley’s additions, diagrams, annotations and corrections (in pen and pencil) of Aethyrs 28-1. The notebooks are divided as follows: I: Aethyrs 28-19, II: Aethyrs 18-13, III: Aethyrs 12-9, IV: Aethyrs 8-5, V: Aethyrs 4-2 and VI: Aethyr 1. The title is: The Vision and the Voice being the Cries of the Thirty Aethyrs. see Liber CDXVIII [418] – The Vision and the Voice. Having completed the Great Magical Retirement in the desert and called upon the Aethyrs, from 28-1, on the last day of the year, Friday 31st December 1909, they left Algiers and set sail for Southampton. Upon their return to England, Crowley gave the notebooks to J. F. C. Fuller for transcribing and they remained in his safe-keeping for the rest of his life.
  2. In throwing sand at the boundary of the Circle to cover its circumference and Holy Names he must also obliterate the perimeter of the Triangle to create a ‘bridge’ to gain access to the Circle.
  3. The word ‘bordj’ in Algerian Arabic translates as ‘fort’ or ‘tower’ and usually indicates the town was originally a military outpost.
  4. The unnumbered pages of the 10th Aethyr (in Notebook III) would give pp. 21-36 and the Note by Scribe pp. 37-39. None of the following pages in Notebook III after the 11th Aethyr (pages 11, 12 and 20) are numbered. Each page consists of 24 horizontal lines with a red vertical margin on the left hand side. The 6 Notebooks are held at the Harry Ransome Centre, Austin, Texas, box 5, folders 1-3.
  5.  In Liber CDXVIII Crowley’s 19th Key gives the example of the Aire as LIL (the first Aethyr) and a variable Governor name of IDOIGO. In a footnote Crowley writes: ‘This name [IDOIGO] may be appropriately varied with the Aire.’ This has caused some confusion. Lon Milo DuQuette says in his Enochian World of Aleister Crowley (1991) that it is ‘the only call necessary for workings with the Aethyrs. It is only necessary to change the name of the Aethyr itself near the beginning of the Call.’ He then adds – ‘In a footnote in Chanokh, Crowley mentions a second name in the Call that “… may appropriately be varied with the Aire.” Try as I may to discover a logical correlation between LIL (the Aethyr in question) and IDOIGO (the footnoted name in question), I cannot. Until I do, I will continue to vary the Call of the Thirty Aethyrs only with the name of the Aethyr itself. If I am wrong I am willing to be forgiven.’ (p. 53) If one were to adhere to Crowley’s ‘variable’ footnote, the tenth Aethyr has three Governors (drawn from the ‘little Black Tablet’of Spirit) who are: LEXARP, COMANAN and TABITON. For a greater understanding of the translation see The Cry of the Second Aethyr [ARN] which explains in more detail the Thelemic context of the Call.
  6. ‘ANAPHAXETON – ANAPHANETON – PRIMEUMATON, and in the angles MI-CA-EL’ see The Goetia of the Lemegeton of Solomon the King [ANAPHANETON replaces the word TETRAGRAMMATON in the Goetic triangle, see Crowley’s diagram showing the Sun, the Triangle and the Circle] The Exorcism of Honorius from the Grimoire of Honorius – French translation by Eliphas Levi [cf. Histoire de la Magie, book V, chapter 1]; Crowley made an English translation in the form of a poem titled The Magician, see The Equinox, volume I, number I, March 1919. p. 109, and The Winged Beetle. 1910. p. 228. I reproduce the poem following Neuburg’s ‘Note by Scribe’.
  7. In the original notebook (in black ink) Frater Omnia Vincam uses the ampersand for ‘and’ and writes the word ‘And’ at the beginning of a sentence. The written record of the Tenth Aethyr ‘ZAX’ in the notebook (number III) occupies 16 pages in black ink (with pencil corrections) and the ‘Note by Scribe’ takes up two and a half pages, in black and blue ink. The Introductory pages, including the oath, were torn out of notebook III and have not been found. ‘Zazas Zazas Nasatanada Zazas’ – these are the words that are said to open the gate of Hell – the Abyss.
  8. Added in brackets in pencil later.
  9. The notebook has the word ‘Here’ crossed out and the word ‘Next’ added later in pencil. The ‘beautiful courtesan’ Neuburg had loved in Paris was the Lancashire born, bohemian artist’s model Euphemia Lamb [born Annie Euphemia Forrest] (1887-1957)
  10. The word ‘Aethyr’ is crossed out and ‘Demon’ added in pencil.
  11. The notebook has ‘trumpets’ crossed out and ‘tempests’ added in pencil.
  12. ‘and the udders of the Cat of slime’ inserted in pencil later.
  13. The notebook has this line in pencil, and following it, also in pencil but crossed out is: ‘again he assumed the mask of Frater P.’
  14. Following the word ‘Scribe’ is ‘who then cursed him.’ in ink and crossed out.
  15. Following the words ‘colloquy ensued’ is ‘Then was the Aethyr resumed’ in ink and crossed out. The next line beginning ‘The Scribe cursed him’ and ending ‘power of the Pentagram’ is added afterwards in pencil.
  16. The angel is Crowley’s Holy Guardian Angel ‘Aiwass’ who dictated Liber AL, the Book of the Law. In the notebook the line reads: ‘[Here the Scribe averred that he knew everything, & ordered the demon to proceed.]’ The word ‘everything’ in ink is crossed through and in pencil above it is added ‘more than the demon, & so feared him not’, the line then continues: ‘& ordered the demon to proceed.]’ Following this the demon declares that ‘Knowledge is my name’ – Knowledge = Daath, the invisible 11th ‘conceptual’ sephira which is not a sephira, it is below the Supernal Triad on the Tree of Life below Chokmah and Binah, the merging of Wisdom and Understanding or Intellect with Morality. Daath is a bridge between the Higher Sephiroth (Intellect) and the lower Sephiroth (Emotional and Physical). The Chaos of the Abyss separates the Higher from the lower planes on the Tree, between the non-ego and the ego. It is therefore necessary for the magician to have attained the Knowledge and Conversation of the Holy Guardian Angel and the grade of Adeptus Exemptus 7=4 before attempting such an ordeal, to attain the grade of Master of the Temple 8=3.
  17. The word ‘understanding’ is followed by an asterix (in ink); beneath the word ‘Choronzon’ a wavy line in ink separates the text and the asterix introduces the following note in ink: ‘Originally, for ‘understanding’ was written ‘power.’ Choronzon was always using some word that did not represent his thought, because there is no proper link between his thought & speech.’
  18. Following the word ‘spear’ in the notebook is an illegible series of several words; the ink is very faint and there appears to be a double-line crossing through it which makes it difficult to decipher.
  19. Following ‘obtain’ the original notebook reads in ink: ‘the shirt of the Frater Perdurabo’ which is crossed out (in ink) and replaced in ink with ‘wherewith to cover his nakedness.’ Jean Overton Fuller in her volume The Magical Dilemma of Victor Neuburg (1965) paints a rather more poetic version of Neuburg’s encounter with Choronzon, saying ‘in the form of a naked man, the demon leaped into the circle and upon Victor, throwing him to the ground. They rolled over in the sand and the demon sought Victor’s throat with its teeth, then tried to bite through the bones at the back of his neck. Victor stabbed at him with his dagger and was able eventually to drive him back into the triangle. He retraced the arc of the circle where the sand had been pushed over it.’ [Mandrake Press, 2005 edition, pp. 176-177]
  20. ChURUNZUN = 8 + 6 + 200 + 6 + 50 + 7 + 50 = 333 (3x111). BABALON is of course 156 (12x13 – the Formula of the Four Watchtowers of the Universe). Babalon is the Great Mother and the Scarlet Woman, she is the wife of Chaos, the All-Father who conquers the Abyss of Choronzon, ‘Victory’ – Netzach. The Holy Ring is a symbol of Nuit and the Circle represents the Goddess as an expression of her totality in her infinite space and continuity. It is complementary and equilibrated to the magical Wand with its power of invoking and banishing.
  21. The phrase ‘seemed to be’ in black ink is crossed out and the word ‘seemingly’ in blue ink is added.
  22. From herein, the paragraph beginning ‘Also is it meet to record’ until the end of the document which is the tenth Aethyr, the passages are written in blue ink and not the black it begins with.
  23. After the word ‘silence:’ the word ‘this’ is crossed out in pencil and the word ‘thus’ added in pencil before ‘is he brought to obey.’
  24. In the notebook this paragraph begins: ‘For Choronzon is distraction’; the word ‘For’ is crossed out with blue ink and the word ‘distraction’ is written in pencil above the same word in blue ink which is almost illegible, but seems to clarify the word.

 


















































 

THE HEART’S ASCENSION
For K. M. Ward
 
Mountain-wrapt and solemn – you
Found features fair of nature’s wings,
By Buttress, slab and crag, you slew
The beauty of those eternal things
And cherished wisdom thou didst woo.
 
Giant, list your pleasures, true –
Your appetite for the hair and quill;
Your search for companionship, anew;
Fascinations sustained by sanguine will
In this most enduring, undetermined glue
 
Where molecules aright are oft’ askew
As passions for the Burmese soul, raged
And found such a purity that you felt too
By strong mind and lithe body, engaged
In landscape and architecture… You knew
 
That the dark heart of inconsequence grew
Into proportions of incompleteness, defined
By science and sensations; impenetrably drew
A distant longing for love still, much refined
And always beyond reach… but briefly blew
 
The wind of enchantment through chambers blue
To lie with solitude’s sorrows and remain
Like a finger-hold into religion… drawn unto
The spirit’s deliverance…the acceptance of pain
And the heart’s ascension – I bid thee sweet adieu!
 
Barry Van-Asten

 

 

Ink Illustration, B. Van-Asten. 8th April 1994

 

PINNACLES, PEAKS AND POETRY:
THE EARLY MOUNTAINEERING
PASSION OF ALEISTER CROWLEY
BY
BARRY VAN-ASTEN

 

The climber should never be frail,
Should thrive on a morsal of hash.
At cliffs he must not become pale
Nor tremble when glaciers crash.
He must carelessly knock out the ash
From his pipe while a terrible chunk
Of rock hurtles by like a flash, -
Or turn from the wall of the Monch.


[Ballade of Guideless Climbing. In Residence: The Don’s Guide to
Cambridge. Aleister Crowley. London. Elijah Johnson. 1904. p. 23]

 

There is such an emphasis placed on the occult endeavours of Aleister Crowley that one tends to overlook his mountaineering achievements, which were certainly impressive. In this article I wish to look at some of his early ascents during the eighteen-nineties in Wales, Scotland and the Lake District, where some of the finest climbing in Britain exists, before he progressed to the larger mountains in the Alps. Much of Crowley’s early poetry was influenced by his passion for climbing, if not directly, then by a romantic notion of the poet as a man of nature, beautiful and rugged, challenging the elements to endure whatever he encountered with gentlemanly conduct and spirit; his hero of course, was Shelley.

 

Here the green moss is my seat,
Beech is a canopy o’er me,
Calm and content the retreat;
Man, my worst foe, cannot bore me;
Life is a closed book behind – Shelley an
open before me.
 
Shelley’s own birds are above
Close to me (why should they fear me?)
May I believe it – that love
Brings his bright spirit so near me
That, should I whisper one word – Shelley’s
swift spirit would hear me.

 

[In the woods with Shelley. Mysteries: Lyrical and Dramatic.
 1898. Collected Works (1905), volume I, pp. 124-125] 

 

The discipline and endurance involved with mountaineering, the subtle strategy of chess and the ecstatic heights of poesy, gave Crowley a perfect grounding in magical technique and ability; the visionary process one encounters when scaling a rock face, the precise hand and footholds; the visual element of chess, seeing several moves ahead and being able to co-ordinate manoeuvres and captures as they evolve; and the exhilarating technical skills composing verse is parallel to the invocations and prayers one finds in old manuscripts and an essential ability in the composition of rituals. It is as if these early passions of Crowley were leading him, unknowingly at the time, towards the spiritual shores of his imagination and to the portal of the Golden Dawn.

The love of the mountains remained with Crowley throughout his life and he never forgot the ones that got away and escaped his grasp, as he was reminded in his Confessions (p. 616) – ‘the Coolin crack on Beachy Head (curse it!), the direct way up the Deep Ghyll Pillar (damn it!), the east face of the Dent Blanche (blast it!)’; of course there would be later expeditions with Oscar Eckenstein to Mexico in 1901 to climb Ixtaccihautl (around 17,250 feet) and Popocatapetl (around 17,800 feet), and to the Himalayas to climb K2 (Chogo Ri, 28,251 feet) in 1902 and Kenchenjunga (28,169 feet) in 1905, which were some of the most memorable and magical experiences for him, when man, alone or with his companions, defies the mountain gods and ascends to the glories of the pinnacles and the peaks.

Edward Alexander Crowley, son of Edward Crowley (1829-1887), The Grange, Redhill, Surrey, entered Malvern School in Worcestershire, in May 1891 and left the following Easter 1892, then during the summer term that year, on 12th May, he entered Tonbridge School in Kent, but his stay there was short. (1)

After the death of his father, young Alick became more disruptive and rebellious against authority, especially the strict Plymouth Brethren in which he was raised. In the Confessions (p. 59) he says ‘for a year or two after my father’s death my mother did not seem to settle down; and during the holidays we either stayed with Bishop [his uncle, Tom Bond Bishop (1839-1920)] or wandered in hotels and hydros. I think she was afraid of bringing me up in London; but when my uncle moved to Streatham she compromised by taking a house in Polworth Road. I hated it, because there were bigger houses in the neighbourhood.’ We can see from this that Crowley had developed a snobbish attitude and we can see an example of his rebellious nature from the following newspaper article of May 1892, he soon had a brush with the law: ‘A Collegian’s Foolish Trick. At the Lambeth Police Court on Friday [29th April] Edward Alexander Crowley,16,described as a collegian, of Oak view, Polworth-road, Streatham Common, was charged with wilfully extinguishing a public street lamp at Greyhound-lane. The prisoner pleaded guilty. Mr. Biron: what made you do this foolish trick? Prisoner: I don’t know sir.’ Mr. Biron served sentence of ten shillings or seven days – he was fined ten shillings. (2)

 

THE FOTHERGILL CONUNDRUM

 

I believe I have discovered the identity of the Reverend Fothergill who tutored young Crowley around 1890 and whom Crowley had famously thrown from the rowing boat into a Scottish loch near Lairg while staying at Forsinard in the Sutherland Scottish Highlands. Crowley does not mention the forenames of the good Reverend Fothergill but says in his Confessions (pp. 71-72) that ‘on one occasion the Rev. Fothergill had taken me for the summer to a fishing centre near Lairg called Forsinard. We went fishing one day to a loch over the moors and in the course of some argument I threw his rod far into the water. He attacked me with fury, but I got a good hold and threw him after it. I then went off in the boat, but he caught me as I was pushing off, overturned the boat on top of me and tried to drown me. That night the gods still further favoured me, for a village girl named Belle MacKay found herself with nothing better to do than to roam with me amid the heather. We returned together quite openly and Fothergill threw up the sponge. He took me back to London the next morning. Breaking the journey at Carlisle, I repeated my victory with a buxom chambermaid.’ Looking at Crockford’s Clerical Directory for the year 1895, on page 476 there are four Reverend Fothergills – Rev. Clifford Douglas Fothergill of New Road, Ware; Rev. John Fothergill of Gravesend; Rev. Matthew Monkhouse Fothergill and Rev. Rowland John Fothergill (son of the above John Fothergill). The last two Fothergills: M. M. Fothergill, born in Wales in 1832 (and dying in 1913) spent most of his time in the United States and Canada (from 1857); his son, R. J. Fothergill, born around 1871 in Quebec, Canada also remained in Canada, making them easily dismissible. Rev. John Fothergill (1854-1914) born in Westmoreland and educated at King’s College, London; Queen’s College, Oxford and Queen’s College, Cambridge (ordained 1868, Salisbury and priest the following year) equally seemed the wrong candidate and I divined upon Reverend Clifford Douglas Fothergill (1866-1938) as a good proposition for further research. He was born in Keswick, Cumberland on 16th May 1866, the second son of Thomas Rowland Fothergill (1839-1909) and Laura Julia Crawshay (1843-1920) who were married in Wales on 10th April 1862. Clifford matriculated from Ayers House during Michaelemas term 1885 and migrated to Queen’s College, Cambridge (BA 1888, MA 1892) [Ridley Hall, Cambridge, 1891]; he was ordained deacon in Carlisle in 1892 and priest at St. Albans, Ware, in 1894 where he was curate in 1893. His other curacies include: St. Mary’s Church, Maryport, Cumberland 1892-4, Christ Church, Ware, Hertfordshire 1894-6, Stanwix, Carlisle, Cumberland 1901-3, Holy Trinity Church, Scarborough 1904-7, vicar of Drax, Selby, Yorkshire 1907-25 and vicar of Borrowdale and Minister at Grange, Cumberland 1931-8. In November 1895 he offered his services to the CMS [Church Missionary Society] and became the Principle of the CMS High School at Dera Ismail Khan in the Punjab, India from 1896-9. He married Eleanor Amelia Fergie (1864-1954) in Ormskirk, Lancashire on 13th May 1896. I present the following evidence to support my claim that the Reverend Clifford Douglas Fothergill is indeed the Rev. Fothergill who tutored the young Aleister Crowley and accompanied him to Scotland: Clifford had experience of rowing as he rowed for the Queen’s College, Cambridge boat crew during the Lent term of 1889 [Cambridge University General Almanack and Register for the year 1889, p. 336]; he is mentioned in connection with ‘Forsinard, Rev. C. D. Fothergill’ [The Fifty-First (136th) Annual Report of the Religious Tract Society, 1901, p. 290]; to distinguish that this is the same Rev. C. D. Fothergill he is also listed in the same periodical of 1893 (p. 313) for ‘Maryport’ and in 1897 (p. 329) for ‘Ware’ – Clifford was also a member of the British and Foreign Bible Society since 1895 and was appointed Assistant District Secretary of the North Western District in 1899 (Lancashire and Isle of Man) – he is mentioned specifically with ‘Lairg’ in a newspaper article which reads under Clerical: ‘Rev. C. Fothergill, Bracklock, Lairg’ [Yorkshire Post and Leeds Intelligencer. 17th July 1920, p. 8]. He had an interest in fishing and wrote a letter to The Fishing Gazette [23rd August 1930, p. 247] which mentions his ‘climbing’ – the letter is signed ‘C. D. Fothergill, Newtonhall Vicarage, Stocksfield, Northumberland’. Crowley says it was during the summer and Clifford suffered from hay fever and asthma during the summer months and had to retreat to higher elevations for his holidays – an article in the Whitehaven Advertiser and Cleator Moor and Egremont Observer [Saturday 20th August 1892, p. 3] mentions the Reverend Fothergill having to leave Maryport after a short time there because of ill health and taking ‘a voyage to Japan for benefit of health’ – one wonders whether Crowley contributed to his condition! Also, ‘Reverend C D Fothergill, M.A., owing to an attack of hay fever and asthma, has had to take a holiday. He is at present in the Highlands’ [Selby Times, Friday 16th June 1911, p. 4]; ‘Rev C D Fothergill, being away for a short holiday in Wales’ [Selby Times, Friday 20th October 1911, p. 3]; also, ‘Rev C D Fothergill, M.A. is on holiday until the end of July, in the North of Scotland’ [Selby Times, Friday 6th June 1913, p. 4] and as further proof, the following from The Record [Friday 4th April 1902, p. 15] under the heading: ‘A Holiday Proposal – Sir, Could you possibly find a space for an inquiry whether any clergy, taking their holidays between June 16 and July 16, would care to join a Clergy Mountain Camp in the Lake District? Being a native of the district, and compelled by asthma to seek high elevations at that season, I propose “pitching at Esk House (the watershed of Borrowdale, Eskdale, and Wastdale), some 2,500 feet above sea level. To climbers, artists and fishermen seeking a bracing holiday nothing could more readily meet their needs. Scafell, Bowfell, the Langdale Pikes, Great Gable, the Pillar and the Steeple – some of the wildest rock-climbs in the British Isles – are all within easy reach. It is companionship I seek. Each would share expenses from the day of arrival, and take part in camp life. I will gladly give full plans proposed to any lover of wild scenery seeking a cheap form of holiday. (Rev.) C. D. Fothergill, Stanwix, Carlisle.’ I am quite content that Reverend Clifford Douglas Fothergill is indeed Crowley’s Reverend Fothergill – he died in Tunbridge Wells, Kent on Wednesday 26th October 1938 aged 72. (3) The next tutor hired by Tom Bond Bishop to instruct young Crowley was Sheffield born James Archibald Douglas (1866-1930) of Merton College, Oxford, who matriculated there on 13th October1883 (BA 1886, MA 1891). Douglas took Crowley to Torquay, Devon in the spring of 1891, first with the idea of riding bicycles there but at Guildford Crowley was too ill to ride further and they took the train; once there they stayed at 5, Cary Parade and Douglas taught the boy the finer points of smoking, drinking, racing, billiards, cards, and of course, women and a new world opened up to the boy and he lost no time in losing his virginity with a girl of the theatre in the first ten days of arriving at Torquay.

During September 1892, sixteen year old Alick and his mother Emily Bertha Crowley were holidaying on the Isle of Skye and staying at the Sligachan Hotel and young Alick struck up a conversation about fell walking and climbing with the surgeon Sir Joseph Lister (1827-1912) who was a keen walker and climber; no doubt the young Crowley talked about some of the Scottish climbs, such as Ben Ledi and Ben More, that he did the previous month in August while staying with his mother at Callander in Perthshire. (4) Lister, seeing his enthusiasm, introduced Crowley to some of his climber friends who were staying at the hotel, such as John Henry Gibson (1862-1898), a member of the Scottish Mountaineering Club who like many other mountaineers used the hotel as a hub for various ascents on the Black Cuillin range. The next day, Gibson and his fellow climbers took young Crowley up the Cuillin Munro peak, Sgurr nan Gillean (3,169 feet) via the Pinnacle route and the boy was entranced by the nature and spirit of climbing, the endurance of muscle against rock and the challenges, much like chess, of the routes proposed. Under the spell of the mountain gods (and no doubt the Gaelic names), Alick also climbed Sgurr a Ghreadaidh and Sgurr a Mhadaidh (3,012 feet) by himself, and Bruach na Frithe (3,143 feet), the Lota Corrie Route, Am Basteir (3,064 feet), and the Bloody Stone, a large boulder which marks the site of a battle in 1398 between the MacDonald and MacLeod clans.

He continued his climbing the following year during April and May 1893 in Snowdonia and then during June and September that year, in the Lake District with his tutor, Dr. Frederick Augustine Robinson (1870-1906) of Christ’s Church, Cambridge, who is the ‘brother of the Dean of Westminster’ (5); they were staying at a farm in Langdale and Crowley ‘heard from the natives of the celebrated twenty-four hours’ walk’ which consisted of climbing the four highest fells in the Lake District – Scafell Pike (3,209 feet), Helvellyn (3,117 feet), Skiddaw (3,054 feet) and Saddleback (2,848 feet). He says in his Confessions (p. 88) that he ‘conceived of a minor ridge walk and set out one morning at dawn from Langdale, climbed the Langdale Pikes, and followed the crest of the fells to Scafell Pikes. Then I crossed to Scafell by the Broad Stand; and seeing the Deep Ghyll pinnacle, climbed that on my way to the summit of Scafell. It was a terrifically hot day over Lingmell and down into the valley to climb the screes of Great Gable. My attention was attracted by the Great Napes Needle and I climbed that. Thence I took the easiest way – the Needle ridge, or a gully, I forget which – to the summit of the mountain. I had become almost insane from heat, thirst and exhaustion; I could no longer walk, but crawled on hands and knees down to Sty Head Tarn, whose waters revived me to some extent. I struggled on homewards and reached the top of Rossett Ghyll Pass shortly after nightfall. There was a bright moon, but I had a terrible time picking my way down the path. I must have become a little light-headed from exhaustion and there was a Dantesque quality in the long climb among the blinding white patches of light and the jetty shadows. At the bottom of the pass I met a small rescue party who had just started out to look for me, and reached home about eleven o’clock. It was, in its way, a remarkable performance for a boy.’ The climb is recorded in the Wastdale Climbing Book of Monday 19th June 1893 where he says ‘starting from Langdale 3.30 a.m. Scawfell Pike was reached via Great End, Ill Crag & Broad Crag 8.0 a.m. Thence I went to Scawfell by the Broad Stand & did the D. G. Pillar en route from Scafell to Great Napes Needle via Lingmell, climbed the Needle & proceeded to Great Gable, on the top I got sunstroke* & was unconscious two hours after which I crawled back to Langdale 10.30 p.m. I was alone from Scawfell!!! E. Aleister Crowley, p.s. Weather almost overpoweringly hot all the way. June 19 1893 E.A.C.’ Crowley adds this humorous note concerning the sunstroke: ‘*It was I that got it, though the lion annotator seems to be suffering from its effects.’

On a following wet morning he was climbing Scafell to tackle some of the gullies and on reaching the Grass Traverse he ‘heard voices in the mist above me, and a few minutes later a powerful man with red whiskers and a rope about his shoulders came towards me from the cliff.’ (p. 89) The man was the Lakeland farmer and pioneer Fell walker, John Wilson Robinson (1853-1907), a member of the Fell and Rock Climbing Club who showed him some climbs. Robinson was climbing with Owen Glynn Jones (1867-1899), a notable climber who quarrelled with Robinson over his choice of climbing Steep Ghyll which would have been a foolhardy endeavour as there are no handholds and it was wet and icy, and so they parted; Crowley disagreed with Jones’s manner of climbing and considered Jones a self-publicist. Jones was to die in a climbing accident in Switzerland on Dent Blanch in 1899 aged 31. (6)

Robinson asked Crowley whether he had done any climbing in Wales and Crowley said yes, mentioning ‘one particular place, the Devil’s Kitchen or Twll Du, which I had climbed by taking off my boots’ he says in the Confessions (p. 90); apparently it was supposed to be un-climbable and Owen Jones had even failed to scale it and promptly accused Crowley of lying – ‘I have always failed to see that it is necessary to make a fuss about one’s climbs.’ Jones had subsequently boasted of having the first ascent of Kern Knotts Chimney, but failed to ascend the top pitch without assistance; Crowley attempted it and ‘found that by wedging a stone into a convenient crack, and thus starting a foot higher up, I could get to the top, and did so. I recorded this in the Climbers’ Book; and the following day a man named H. V. Reade, possibly in a sceptical mood, followed in my footsteps. He found my wedged stone, contemptuously threw it away, climbed the pitch without it, and recorded the feat. That was a double blow to Mr. Jones. It was no longer a convincing argument that if he couldn’t do a thing it couldn’t be done.’ (p. 91)

Of his climb of the Mickledoor Chimney and ‘it had been the ambition of every climber to start from the exact top of the ridge. This was called the direct climb of Mickledoor; and nobody had done it. That seemed to be a shame, so I did it. This time the fat was in the fire. My good faith was openly challenged in the smoking-room [of the Wastwater Hotel which also boasted a billiard room]. I shrugged my shoulders, but offered to repeat the climb the following day before witnesses – which I accordingly did.’ (p. 91)

He also recalls meeting a climber named Corry (Confessions. p. 154) and they went climbing together on Scafell. This was Robert Corry (1872-1935), a member of the Scottish Mountaineering Club and the Alpine Club who was staying in Wastdale; Crowley says he was the ‘ideal athlete and had gone through a course of Sandow; but had little experience of climbing at that time. I took him up the North Climb of Mickledoor. There is one place where, while hunting for holds, one supports oneself by an arm stretched at full length into a crack. The arm is supported by the rock and the hand grasps a hold as satisfactory as a sword hilt. The inconceivable happened; Corry fell off and had to be replevined by the rope. I was amazed, but said nothing. We continued the climb and, reaching the top of the Broad Stand, took off the rope. By way of exercise, I suggested climbing a short, precipitous pitch above a sloping slab. There was no possible danger, it was within the powers of a child of six; but Corry came off again. I was standing on the slab and caught him by the collar as he passed on his way to destruction.

After that, we put on the rope again and returned by descending, I think, Mickledoor Chimney. On the way down to Wastdale, he was strangely silent and embarrassed, but finally he made up his mind to ask me about it.

‘Do you mind if I feel your arm?’ he said. ‘It must be a marvel.’

I complied and he nearly fainted with surprise. My muscles were in quantity and quality like those of an early Victorian young lady. He showed me his own arm. There could not have been a finer piece of anatomy for manly strength. He could not understand how, with everything in his favour, he had been unable to maintain his grip on the best holds in Westmorland.’

 

A SPRING SNOWSTORM IN WASTDALE
 
On rocky mountain bare
Of grass, and meadows fair,
Angels their trumpets blow upon the night.
While o’er the shrinking dale
The insatiable gale
Roars with unconquered and impassive might.
Their robes of snow they rend,
And their deep voices blend
With tempest, like that angry Amphirite,
Her hair blown wild and loose
On windy Syracuse,
Lashing the waves with words of wrath, a
terror of bright light.
 
Here the thick snowflakes fall,
Till mountain in their pall,
And stream beneath their curtain are embraced;
They drive and beat and hiss,
Till their cold maiden kiss
Touches the lake’s intolerable waste,
 And from the wave is born
A maiden like the morn,
In sudden foam, an Aphrodite chaste,
Clean as the cold wind blown
From each abyss of stone,
Where the north whirlpool rushes down with
wreckage interlaced.
 
Here on the bank I stand
In this grey barren land
Of winter, and the doubtful glint of spring
If on the hills there glow
Through the thick mist of snow
Sunshine from westward in the evening;
While in a dell appear
Violets and snowdrops clear,
Buds of the larch, and swallows on the wing,
Ere once again the storm
Lofty and multiform
Close the bright glimpse of summer and the
hope of everything.
 
Silence her throne assumes,
Stars mount the sky, and looms
The misty monarch of the dale on high:
About the silver feet
I worship, as is meet,
The warrior God that fixed the curved sky,
Rent the cavernous earth,
Moulded in awful birth
The terror of the cloudy canopy,
And tore from underground
The lake’s immense profound,
And clad the mountains now with this faint
snow embroidery.
 
Now the white flakes decrease.
Wastwater lies in peace,
Kissed by the breezes where the wind once bit;
Gable alone doth stand,
A Pyramid more grand
Than Pharaoh’s pride exalted, or the wit
Of magian shepherds built
Who sought his land and spilt
Blood of ten million slaves to conquer it.
Clad in sparse robes of white
The mountain beckons Night
Her tracery of azure with the cold moon-rays
to knit.
 
Armoured with secret might
I stand on earth upright,
Strong in the power of Him who welded earth,
Barred in the sky with steel,
And breathed upon the wheel
Of this vast scheme of stars, and made Him mirth
In the poor dreams of us
Who strive mysterious
To pierce the bands of sense, and break the girth
Of our own mind’s desire,
Till He relume the fire
Lost at our fall, not kindled fresh till that
diviner birth.

[Songs of the Spirit [1898]. Aleister Crowley Collected Works, volume I. 1905. pp. 43-44]

 

AT EASTBOURNE

 

Discovering that boarding school life was not conducive to the young Crowley, he left Tonbridge in the summer of 1893 and boarded with a private tutor and Plymouth Brother at 4, Sussex Gardens in Eastbourne, named Lambert while during the day he studied and assisted in the Chemistry Laboratory under Professor Robert Edward Hughes, M.A., B.Sc. (1865-1924) at Eastbourne College.

In November 1893 he became a member of the Eastbourne Chess Club and before long was secretary of the club. On the evening of Friday 3rd November he played in a club match game between Eastbourne and Hailsham at the George Hotel and again in the Eastbourne Chess Club Handicap Tournament in January 1894 against William Coupe (7). Crowley, under the pseudonym Ta Dhuibh (Gaelic – ‘the dark one’) began a regular chess column in the Eastbourne Gazette every Wednesday under the title ‘Chess Notes’, the first one appearing on Wednesday 31st January 1894 and the final one on Wednesday 25th April that year.

Crowley won his game against John Berriman Campion Coles (Hailsham) on Friday 26th January (8) and Eastbourne lost to Lewes in February; Crowley won his March game against R. F. Tyhurst in the Eastbourne v Uckfield tournament, Crowley writing in his chess column: ‘We have won great glory, my men’ before penning a triumphant limerick:

‘There was a smart chess club at Eastbourne,
Whose glory and honour increased, borne
On pinions cherubic
They conquered so ubiq-
Uitously, those players of Eastbourne.’ (9)

He played his game in the Eastbourne Club Championship on Friday 9th March 1894 and again on Wednesday 21st March against Hastings, playing C. M. Wilson (10); then Eastbourne won against Lewes towards the end of March, Crowley playing against J. Waterfall (11). Crowley then played against the young Hector William Shoosmith in the Eastbourne v Brighton McArthur Cup on Saturday 31st March and on Friday 13th April the club had a visit from Joseph Henry Blackburne who gave demonstrations in ‘simultaneous display’ of seven games, one against Crowley. (12)

Crowley was chosen to represent the county of Sussex in a match against North London at the Queen’s Hotel, the ‘headquarters of the Hastings and St. Leonards Club’ on Saturday 19th May, playing against H. H. Symons (13).

Crowley’s first visit to Beachy Head was on Wednesday 4th April 1894 with his 2nd cousin and playmate from his childhood, Gregor Grant (14); they were both members of the Cuchullin Club, a rock climbing club in which Gregor Grant, of Tower House, Bexley, Kent, was President – quite how many members there were in the club is unknown and it may have just been the two of them. They explored the area and ‘upper portion of the cliff lying between Monkey island and the Devil’s Chimney, and to this portion we have since kept.’ They reached the Grass Traverse which runs along the Devil’s Chimney; they beheld ‘Etheldreda’s Pinnacle, with the cliff, here fissured with the magnificent “Cuillin crack”’ which ‘attracted our notice, affording a walk to the top. This cleft forms the top of “Etheldreda’s walk,” so called, I believe, after a lady who never walked there. It extends downwards and round Etheldreda’s pinnacle to the foot of Grant’s Chimney.’ They encountered the ‘two chimneys, side by side, and since named Castor and Pollux’ and they began to climb the North Pillar (Castor). Crowley reached the ridge and ‘my friend refused to follow, but as he was roped I put on sudden pressure, and he – well – changed his mind. When he reached the ridge I went on for the N. face.’ Crowley says that ‘the whole climb, however, requires a method of climbing which may be described as a chemical combination of the writhe, the squirm, and the slither. This indeed applies to all difficult chalk.’ The summit, he recalled, consisted of a ‘big square block, which rocked and swayed under me as I sat upon it.’

Two months later, on Wednesday 4th July, Crowley and Grant climbed the Devil’s Chimney, descending from the cliff to Pisgah, where Grant remained while Crowley descended the ridge to Jordan, then using his axe, he made the chalk less unstable which had fallen away in his hands and made his way to the summit, the Tooth, before rejoining Grant on Pisgah. A week later on Wednesday 11th July, Crowley is by himself, reconnoitring new climbs and awaiting his cousin to join him in the ensuing week. Crowley ascends Etheldreda’s Walk, and ‘discovered Grant’s Chimney towering some 200 feet above.’ He climbed up the Devils’ Chimney and reaches Pisgah Summit. On Friday 13th July – cousin Gregor now with him – they make an attempt up Etheldreda’s Pinnacle with Grant leading and after the summit, they ‘made a new variation by way of the Pollux chimney.’ Following lunch at the Beachy Head Hotel, they ascend a route up to Pisgah Summit and then the Tooth; Crowley wedged into the Gash: ‘five times I tried to cross the Gash, but with no decent handhold it is hardly to be expected that one can pull one’s self up to a vertical wall. One chance, however, remained. I scooped a hole out of the E. face, inserted my chin, and hauled. I had not shaved for a day or two, so was practically enjoying the advantages of Mummery spikes!’(15) Crowley conquered the Needle but Grant had to remain on the Tooth as the Needle cannot hold two climbers – Grant, had to ‘console himself by hoisting the Union Jack, which we left to wave triumphantly over the scene of our victory.’ (16)

Following this, Crowley travelled with his Plymouth Brethren tutor, Monsieur Lambert (17), to the Tyrol in Austria and Crowley made his first Alpine ascents with climbing brothers, A. E. Maylard and M. W. Maylard, without guides (18). They climbed the Schotterhorn (9,744 feet), almost to the summit, but severe snow prevented them, and the Verlain Spitze (11,631 feet, by a gully in the Rosen wand; descent over Angelus Scharte and the N. W. ridge); then Crowley made several ascents by himself, guideless, from Sulden – Monte Cevedale (12,365 feet), Sulden Spitzse (11,076 feet), Tschengglser (4,101 feet), Hochwand (8,921 feet), Konig Spitze (12,635 feet), Thurweise Spitze (11,982 feet), Ortler Spitze (12,812 feet), Eisse Spitze (10,597 feet, from the N. W.); in August 1894 he climbed with guides, Michael Ortler and J. J. Thoni, of Tratoi, and traversed the Ortler peak, ‘ascending by the Hintere Grat and descending over Stickle Pleiss. Mr. Crowley also accomplished a variation of the Hintere Grat route, by the rock-ridge at the base of the Grat.’ (19)

In his Confessions (p. 101) he says he ‘arrived in Sulden with a deep reverence for the Alpine guide, and hastened to engage Joseph Pingerra, who was supposed to be the best in the valley.’ Crowley learns that in the Tyrol it is customary ‘to go two on a rope instead of three’ but generally he finds the guides lacking in the simplest climbing skills and unwilling to detour from their proposed routes. ‘I engaged two other guides and started for the Konigspitze, spending the night in a hut. In the morning the guides were drunk and unwilling to start, making absurd excuses about the weather. I had not sufficient self-confidence to tackle the Konigspitze by myself; but I dismissed them, made a solitary ascent of the Eisseespitze, and thought the matter over. I was utterly disgusted and decided to learn ice and snowcraft by myself, as I had with rocks.

A few days later I went out alone and made the first ascent of the Ortler by the Hintere Grat. The mountain had previously been climbed on this side; but the ridge had not been followed with the conscientiousness which was the rule in England. It took me six and a half hours to reach the summit.’

While Crowley was traversing the peaks in the Alps, an article appeared in The Eastbourne Gazette under the title ‘Foolhardy Climbers’ – ‘insensate folly takes various forms’ began the correspondent, ‘Censor’, who went on to say that ‘I notice in the window of Mr. Gibbs (chemist, Terminus-road), some notable photographs, showing two foolhardy individuals on the pinnacle at Beachy Head, one being at the summit in a position involving the greatest possible peril. I believe one of the persons referred to is a young gentleman (Mr. Crowley), who is of a very adventurous turn, and has fluttered the Volscians (chess players) in Corioli (their club room). He has contributed some chess notes to the Gazette from time to time.’ The concerned correspondent then goes on to condemn ‘foolhardy climbing at Beachy Head’ before ending on a note of distress for the damage done to the white chalk cliffs by ‘climbers hacking away at it with their pick-axes.’ (20)

Crowley makes a stand against the article and writes from the Hotel Sulden in the Tyrol, Austria on Monday 27th August, saying that he should ‘like to defend myself and my brother mountaineers from the sweeping condemnation.’ He then goes on to expound the beauty and difficulty of chalk climbing, adding that ‘the photographs in Mr. Gibbs’ window may appear to the uninitiated as representing perilous positions – to the mountaineer they are by no means of such a character.’ He then tackles the correspondent on the subject of damage to the chalk, saying ‘the suggestion that the cliffs are marred by our “pick-axes,” as our weapons are quaintly mistermed, is surely rather grotesque, if not puerile.’ In conclusion, he adds, ‘I regret that others should have been made so anxious – as I believe, unnecessarily – also that others should have been led to imitate my climbs without suitable precautions. Mountaineering undertaken lightly, and without a serious conception of the responsibility incurred, is alike insane and criminal. Trusting you will afford me space for this defence and warning, I remain, sir, yours very sincerely, E. Aleister Crowley.’ (21)

Crowley returned to Eastbourne with Gregor Grant and on Monday 1st October 1894 they made an unsuccessful attempt upon the as yet unclimbed chimney, Cuillin Crack. It was the most difficult climb for Crowley on Beachy Head and ‘after incredible exertion it yielded, and then I got a leg and an arm jammed, and managed to wriggle up about 60 feet higher. At this point the rope and my strength were alike exhausted, some four hours, without any sort of rest, having already passed. Foothold and handhold there were none that could be relied upon to support Grant’s additional weight, if any pressure were to be put on the rope. There was nothing for it but to let down a rope from above, or to descend with ignominy and much toil. So Grant sped away to invoke the assistance of the coastguard, and meanwhile I sat wedged in a most uncomfortable position, at the bottom of the second break, up to which I had struggled while waiting Grant’s return. Presently a rope was let down from above, so that by tying my own length of sixty feet to it I could scramble to the top, climbing for the most part, but receiving now and then aid that was more “moral” than any description of it as such.’ (pp. 293-294)

In the latter half of 1894, Crowley fell out of favour with the Lamberts and came to physical blows with the senior tutor. He says in his Confessions (pp. 105-106) that his ‘residence at Eastbourne broke up very suddenly. During the whole of my adolescence I had taken the romantic point of view of love; and I found that the universal practice was for elder people to interfere in the affairs of their juniors. Two people could not decide to marry without rousing a hurricane. There was never any exception. Engagements were always being made and broken on unintelligible religious grounds. The family of the Lamberts was no exception to this. The eldest daughter [Clara Lambert] was an acid old maid in the late twenties; the youngest [Amelia Lambert] was a hysterical monster of suppression. The middle girl [Isabelle Lambert] was beautiful, voluptuous and normal. She was not sufficiently intelligent to revolt openly against her family; but her human instincts told her that something was wrong and that she had better get out of it. She was in love with a quite suitable young man and engaged to him on probation. The question was whether he would or wouldn’t join the Plymouth Brethren. Naturally, the more he saw of them the less he liked them and he ultimately made up his mind to stand by the church of his fathers. On announcing this desolating decision he was overwhelmed with abuse and thrown out of the house. His fiancée was forbidden to communicate with him in any way, and to all intents and purposes imprisoned. I offered to arrange for correspondence with a view to an early elopement. But I couldn’t stand the continuous abuse and ill-treatment which was the portion of the unfortunate girl. The family literally foamed at the mouth on every opportunity. Meals were a poisoned whirlwind. She was constantly reduced to tears and perhaps the happiest time she had was when she was actually being beaten. I ought to have conducted my intrigues with greater patience, no doubt, but it got on my nerves too much. One morning at breakfast I said about a millionth part of what I thought and the family started screaming. It was as if they had been attacked by collective mania. Everything was thrown at me; they went for me with claws and fists. They were too blind with rage to know what they were doing. I simply knocked their heads together and walked out of the house. When I thought the atmosphere had had time to dissipate I returned with the intention of carrying out a rescue for the distressed damsel. They were too much scared to oppose me and I begged her to come away at once and go to her ex-fiance’s family. But she could not summon up courage to do it. The opportunity went by; and later in the afternoon my Uncle Tom, summoned by telegram, came to fetch me away from the accursed spot.’

He returned to Streatham with his Uncle Tom Bond Bishop.

In late September of 1894, Crowley ‘enrolled as a non-matriculated student of King’s College, in the University of London, reading Medicine and Natural Sciences.’ At the university he attended lectures by Sir William Ramsay (1852-1916), Professor of General Chemistry and his assistant, John Norman Collie (1859-1942), who was also an excellent climber. (22)

Also in September 1894 Crowley applied for membership of the Scottish Mountaineering Club, proposed by Ernest Maylard and seconded by Norman Collie. On Friday 7th December 1894 at a special meeting of the Scottish Mountaineering Club, in Glasgow, Crowley was elected a member of the club. (23)

In early 1895, Crowley living at 7, Polworth Road, Streatham, occupies his time with chess and skating. One incident concerning the latter, he recalls in his Confessions (p. 117): ‘Some nameless pompier had sluiced I do not know how many acres of canvas with a representation of Niagara. They built a pavilion to house it. One was supposed to be standing on Goat Island – in fact, one was rather the goat – and one walked round a vast gallery and inspected each segment of the waterfall in turn. (24) In due course everyone had seen it and the question was what to do with the building. They turned it into a palais de glace with real ice. I, always keen on skating, bought a ticket for the season. The convention was for the ordinary skater to swing round the outside, while the experts performed their evolutions in the centre. At the time I was bent on learning the outside forward loop, which involves raising the unemployed leg very high until you discover the knack. Absorbed in this labour I failed to observe the Duke of Orleans, (25) a glaring girl on either arm. He swerved, swanking, out of the ruck and collided with me. We both sat down very hard, but I on the point of his skate to the detriment of my prized perineum. Being then a perfect young fool, as I am now a perfect old one, I supposed it incumbent on my race and caste to pretend not to be hurt, so I forced myself to go on skating despite agony so great that I could hardly bite back the tears, until I thought I had done enough for honour and felt free to slip away. I was engaged that night to a committee meeting of the Climbing Club at the rooms of H. V. Reade in Jermyn Street. (26) I managed somehow to sit through the meeting, the matter being made worse by my insane bashfulness which prevented me asking my host to let me use his bedroom. We proceeded to a restaurant to dinner, but there I broke down and excused myself.

The rest of the evening’s entertainment remains a mystery. I have a vague memory of being stretched on the seat of a railway carriage and I learned later that I had reached home, some six miles from London, soaked to the skin. I suppose I must have wandered about in the rain for an indefinite period, in pain too great to know what I was doing except to try to be brave. The blow had set up cystitis which kept me in bed for the next three weeks. The inflammation gradually disappeared after spreading to the prostate gland and the urethra. Nor was that the end of the trouble. The urethritis caused a discharge which proved very refactory to treatment and ultimately determined a triple stricture for which I am being treated at the moment of dictating this paragraph more than a quarter of a century after the accident. The moral is, of course, to avoid the Bourbons, though, as the duke is reported to be dying at the present moment, it is quite possible that his physician is shaking his head wisely and saying, ‘Ah, Your Highness, this is what comes from getting mixed up with people like Aleister Crowley!...’’ (27)

His cystitis is perhaps the illness which prevented him from attending the Scottish Mountaineering Club’s Easter Meet at Fort William from Thursday 11th April to Tuesday 16th April 1895 in which members, such as Norman Collie and Morris Travers, ascended the summit of Ben Nevis via a first ascent of Castle Ridge on Saturday 13th April. Also during 1895 he applied to join the Alpine Club, he was proposed by Norman Collie and Martin Conway but he was rejected and he held an everlasting grudge against the club.

Also during this period the Oscar Wilde case, which began on Saturday 2nd March 1895, was much in the public interest and no doubt Crowley would have seen the persecution of a poet and playwright as some cause celebre, but he is strangely silent and no doubt keeps his opinions to himself, perhaps recognising something of his own nature which will later flourish when he goes up to Cambridge later that year. The following court libel trial of Wednesday 3rd April – Friday 5th April sees Wilde drop his charges and he was arrested the same day due to the evidence against him. On Friday 26th April Wilde’s first criminal trial for gross indecency opened at the Old Bailey and on Wednesday 22nd May his retrial began which resulted in his conviction on Saturday 25th May 1895 with a sentence of two years in prison with hard labour, a cruel injustice.

Following the furore of the case, in the summer of 1895, Crowley travelled to the Bernese Oberland and made several impressive climbs, such as the Eiger (North wall), the Monch in August and the Jungfrau, Wetterhorn, and Trift, Dent Blanche, Matterhorn. All guideless. His feat earned him a mention in the Scottish Mountaineering Club Journal: ‘Mr. E. A. Crowley, besides minor expeditions, some of them solitary, crossed the Eigerjoch and Jungfraujoch without guides; also the Wetterlucke, Monchjoche, Beichgrat, and Petersgrat more than once. He traversed the Monch from Wengern Alp to the Bergli Hut, climbed the Eiger, the Jungfrau from the Roththat, the Tschingelhorn, and all but completed an ascent of Jungfrau by the difficult Schneehorn route (twenty-one hours out in bad weather). (28)

He says of it in his Confessions (p. 102) that he ‘went to the Liitle Scheideck. My first exploit was a solitary ascent of the Eiger. I started late and on the final ridge caught up with a ‘strong’ party of English with guides, the principle Herr being a charming clergyman from Japan, the Rev. Walter Weston. The guides were more or less drunk and frightened. They were trying to make some excuse for turning back; but shame stimulated their courage when I came up and we proceeded to the summit. We all went down together’. He also says he ‘we went up the Jungfrau by the Scheehorn-Silberhorn route, I leading up and descending last. But it was the same old story. The man [Crowley’s porter] couldn’t stand on a snow slope. I was constantly having to misuse valuable time in saving his worthless life.’

 

CAMBRIDGE

 

While climbing in the Alps Crowley received a telegram from his mother and his uncle, Tom Bond Bishop, requesting him to return home to sit for the entrance examinations for Trinity College, Cambridge, which were in a week’s time. Having returned home and sat for the examinations, Crowley matriculated at Trinity College, Cambridge on Tuesday 1st October 1895. In his first year he rented rooms at 16, St. John’s Street, Cambridge. The following year he became President of the Cambridge University Chess Club which held their meetings every Thursday evening at 8 p.m. at the Hoop Hotel, Bridge Street. (29)

Crowley’s mother, Emily Bertha, must have moved from Oak view, 7, Polworth Road, Streatham, sometime prior to Aleister matriculating at Trinity College as his admission to the college gives the address: Coriena Creach, Rutford Road, Streatham, London. (30) No doubt this is a corruption of the spelling Coire-Na-Creiche (Gaelic) which translates as the ‘corrie of the spoil’; one can assume Aleister Crowley named the residence after being impressed by Coire-Na-Crieche in the Cuillins on Skye where he and his mother were staying in 1892, the place commemorates a clan battle between the Macleods and the MacDonalds in 1601.

On Friday 25th October 1895, Crowley and his cousin, Gregor Grant read a paper entitled ‘On Peak and Pinnacle’ at the Sidcup Literary and Scientific Society held at the Public Hall. (31)

Crowley attended the very wet Scottish Mountaineering Club’s Easter Meet of 1896 from Thursday 2nd to Monday 6th April at Fort William; he was one of 32 members (32) and following this he went climbing at Wastdale Head with Norman Collie and John Wilson Robinson.

Crowley’s aunt Ada Jane Bishop died aged 54 on Thursday 18th June 1896, at Glenorme, Polworth Road, Streatham, where she lived with her brother, Tom Bond Bishop. (33) Aleister attended the funeral in Lambeth on Tuesday 23rd June, and as he says in his Confessions (p. 58), his mother ‘refused to enter the church during the service and waited outside in the rain, only rejoining the procession when the corpse repassed those accursed portals on its way to the cemetery. She stood by the grave while the parson read the service. It was apparently the architectural diabolism to which she most objected.’ Just two months later, Aleister’s maternal grandmother, Elizabeth Bishop (born Elizabeth Cole in 1809) died on Tuesday 4th August 1896 in Wandsworth and she is also buried in Lambeth three days later on Friday 7th August.

At the end of the Easter term which ended on Wednesday 24th June 1896, Crowley travelled to the Bernese Oberland with Morris William Travers (1872-1961) making their first guideless ascent of the Monch (13,480 feet) on Tuesday 14th July. Crowley would have become acquainted with Morris Travers, an Assistant Professor of Chemistry at King’s College, the University of London who worked with Sir William Ramsay and was a friend of fellow scientist and climber, Professor Collie. (34)

Crowley went on to climb Aiguille de la Za (12,034 feet) alone, and they both climbed Aiguilles Rouge d’Arolla (11,962 feet) and the Vuibez Seracs (between 9-11,000 feet). With a companion, he ascended the Trifthorn (12,231 feet) and made a new descent down the North-West face.

The Scottish Mountaineering Club Journal recorded that: ‘Mr. E. A. Crowley, among minor ascents, made a traverse of the Trifthorn, with descent of N. W. face (not given in Conway, and may be new – with a companion); the Aiguille de la Za (alone); the Vuibez Seracs – an ice-fall which has probably not been passed before without taking to the rocks; Aiguille Rouges d’Arolla traversed (climbing every gendarme on south peak – party benighted on ridge). All guideless.’ (35)

Concerning the first descent of the Trifthorn via the West face with a nameless ‘companion’, Crowley says in his Confessions (pp. 130-131) that ‘it was early in the season of ‘96’ and that he met an English climber in the train up to Zermatt ‘whom I will call Arthur Ellis’ which may or may not have been his name. He says that he was ‘anxious to do guideless work and we agreed to try a few mountains together. We made some minor expeditions and he proved highly competent. One day we climbed the Trifthorn by the ordinary route, with the idea of attempting the traverse. As I was going down last, he was carrying the rucksack with our provisions. We made several attempts to find away down the Zinalface; but always the slopes steepened until it became evident that they pitched over, and we had to retrace our steps. Ellis, however, was very annoyed at my caution and wanted to glissade, which was a proposal about as reasonable as jumping off the Eiffel Tower. Presently he made an excuse for taking off the rope and retired behind a rock while I sat down and lit my pipe. I was aroused by a hail. Ellis was three or four hundred feet down the slope! He urged me once more to glissade. He said he had invented a new method of exercising this art, which was to hold the axe by the shaft and use the pick as a brake. It was downright insanity; and took me absolutely by surprise, as previously he had been a sound and careful climber. I could do nothing to restrain him: I tried to humour him and suggested that he should ‘come up to where I was and start fair’. But he wasn’t taking any and let himself go. A few seconds later he was performing cartwheels and then disappeared over the edge. The angle was such that I could not see where he had fallen. I hastily climbed a convenient rock pinnacle. Then I saw him. He was lying, spreadeagled, in the Bergschrund, with his blood staining the snow; which by the way, ought not to have been there, and would not have been but for the continuous bad weather.’ Crowley had to find his way down ‘a face which had never previously been climbed. However, I discovered a route which took me to the glacier in about five hours. At one point I was obliged to lower myself down by the rope; and, as I could not unhitch it, I was thrown more than ever on my own resources after that. On several occasions I was obliged to make some very risky jumps, so that I might have been cut off if I had found a passage beyond my powers.

I must admit feeling considerable disgust at seeing Ellis making his way over the glacier as if nothing had happened. He had fallen some eight hundred feet, the last three hundred sheer drop. I was utterly exhausted and badly in need of food. It was all I could do to catch up to him. The only damage he had suffered was a trifling cut on one leg!’ they made their way to the hut as night began to fall, wading through ‘soft snow up to our waists.’ They had to break into the hut as it was locked and ‘break into the provision room in order to get fuel and the like.’ In the hut, Crowley threw his wet coat on the table over which his Alpine lamp hung with its candle and Crowley, exhausted, lay down in the straw too tired to go to bed. As sleep overtook him he forgot to turn out the lamp and the candle dropped from the lamp and burnt his coat ‘to cinders’.

‘Luckily, the next morning the guardian of the hut came up. I borrowed his coat and went down to Evolena, where my baggage had been sent. Ellis was not fit to be moved and I arranged to come up two days later and fetch him. At [the Hotel in] Evolena I got a change of clothes and sent up the guide’s coat by a porter.’ The next day outside the Hotel just before dinner, Crowley saw the dishevelled form of Arthur Ellis coming down, he had been walking since dawn, over the glacier and cutting steps all the way – he had apparently ‘cut his way down the mule path’. Crowley decided not to climb again with Ellis and he left the hotel in Evolena on Friday 28th August 1896. Crowley adds a few more details in an article published in Vanity Fair – ‘Vain Tale, with a Madman on the Alps’ [24th June 1908, p. 823] saying that he and Ellis ‘accordingly left Zermatt, and spent a comfortable night in the Frift-hut. The next morning we started in fairly decent weather, and reached Triftjoch in good time, and without putting on the rope. We breakfasted, and turned up the easy rocks of the south ridge of the Trifthorn. They were in bad condition, and the description of the ridge in Conway [‘The Alps from End to End’ by Willaim Martin Conway. 1895] led us to choose a route which turned out very troublesome. It was two o’clock before we stood on the summit and shook hands over our first peak.’ They made their decent down the north ridge, putting on the rope with Ellis leading. Following the glissading accident, Crowley, seeing that Ellis is still alive, tells him to ‘drink a few drops’ [of brandy] and ‘make some soup, and wait till I came down to him.’ At the hut they ‘went up-stairs to the “bedrooms,” I was in an inner room – I believe dedicated to the fair sex. But I was too tired for problem plays. I hung the lantern on a nail over the table, on which I flung my sopping clothes; pulled down all the rugs in the place from their rope, rolled myself in them, and lay down, only to see if it was comfortable.’ Intending to turn out the lantern, Crowley is overwhelmed with sleep and wakes the next morning ‘much refreshed’ to find his clothes burnt ‘by the unextinguished candle. I swore and came down to breakfast.’ Crowley borrowed a coat and shirt from the ‘guardian’ of the hut who ‘appeared from the abyss’ and rushes off to Evolena, Ellis deciding to stay another day at the hut. The next morning Ellis does not appear at the hotel, ‘lunch followed a game of chess, and a short, a very short, stroll. No Ellis. At tea we began to get alarmed. I dressed for dinner, however, and wandered out with my friends to taste the evening air. I should explain that to dress for dinner means to put on a tie!’ As they are outside the hotel, Ellis comes towards them, ‘footsore and weary’ with his axe and it appears Ellis had started to climb down at 3 a.m. a climb which should take no more than three hours, but he had been climbing for fifteen hours [this would make the time of the encounter with Ellis around 6 p.m.], cutting steps all the way down. They then went in for dinner and ‘Bullock and I turned a cold and glassy gaze on one and other’ – this would be Herbert Somerset Bullock (1871-1963), of Corpus Christ College, Cambridge (1889-1892), the son of the Rev. Charles Bullock; H. S. Bullock, member of the Alpine Club (1897) was also, like Crowley, an excellent chess player and played for Cambridge. The end of the story reveals a mystery concerning Ellis: ‘I had left Ellis before adjusting our accounts – he remained in my debt to a small amount. On arrival in England I found a letter from him, with the amount owing, and a wish to meet me, and chat over the events of the season! I replied cordially, asking him to dine at my club to meet Travers, with whom I had once climbed. He replied, accepting. The night arrived, and with it Travers, but Ellis was not there. From that day to this I have neither seen him, nor heard of him, save that one vague rumour once come to my ears of his having been seen somewhere in Switzerland.’ This incident occurred before Crowley was to join his friends, Morris Travers and his younger brother, at Arolla.

In the Confessions (pp. 127-128) he says ‘Travers joined me for a short time in August. We began by making the first guideless traverse of the Monch. We started for the Guggi hut within two or three hours of his arrival, he having come straight through from London without breaking the journey. We started the next morning very early and made great speed up the lower slopes in our enthusiasm. Travers became extremely mountain sick. It was obvious that the barometric pressure had nothing to do with it; he was simply upset from the fatigue of the journey, the change to course food and the sudden call upon his full physical strength when out of training.’ He goes on to say that ‘Travers and I wandered about the Oberland for a week without going below the snow-line. His mountain sickness soon disappeared, but he became badly sunburnt.’ Concerning the Vuibez Seracs he says that they ‘constituted one of the most interesting ice climbs that I have ever done…’; ‘We set out the following morning, reaching the obstacle without any difficulty, which gave us a poor idea of the capacity of the mighty men of valour [members of the Alpine Club who had recently attempted it]. But we could not be surprised at their failure to negotiate the obstacle. We found ourselves standing on a knife-edge separated from the over-hanging wall by a crevasse so broad that we could only just reach it with our axes. Travers held me on the rope while I leant across and cut a ledge in the wall which could be used for his hands. Having anchored him to his brother lower down, I lowered him cautiously so that he was able to lean across with his hands on the ledge, thus forming a bridge. I then climbed, in my crampons, on to his shoulders and stood there for forty minutes while I cut hand and foot holds in the overhanging ice. Trusting myself to these, Travers was hastily pulled back to the vertical by his brother. In this position I was able to support my weight on his uplifted axe-head sufficiently to allow me to use one hand. In this way I cut fresh hand holds in the overhanging wall and ultimately pulled myself over the edge. There was still some step-cutting to be done before I got to a sufficiently good place to pull up the others. I have never seen the performance of Travers equalled on any occasion. Hastings himself could hardly have been more strong, steady and enduring, to say nothing of the qualities required to allow a man to stand on his head and shoulders with sharp spikes!’ (p. 129) The climbers then found that there were many ‘tangled pinnacles of ice’ to encounter before reaching the top.

 

It was three o’ the morn and the night was outworn;
We broke fast on Maggi* and Cotton**,
We said Cecil’s jest was a jibe of the best,
And of Morris’s yarns – “that’s a hot ‘un.” (36)

 

*Maggi: a brand of instant soup invented by Julius Maggi in Switzerland in 1884 which was popular with climbers.

**Cotton: John Cotton of Edinburgh, (18th cent.) famous brand of pipe tobacco. The poem mentions Morris [Travers] and Cecil, whom I believe to be Morris’s younger brother Henry Cecil Travers (1876-1958) (37).

 

A DESCENT OF THE MONCH
JULY 14, 1896.
 
An island of the mist. White companies
Of clouds thronged wondrously against the hills,
And in the east a darkening of the winds
That held awhile their breath for very rage,
Too wild for aught but vaporous quivering
Of melting fleeces, while the sudden sun
Fled to his home. Afar the Matterhorn
Reared a gaunt pinnacle athwart the bank,
Where towered behind it one vast pillar of cloud
To thrice its height. Behold the ice-clad dome
On which we stood, all weary of the way,
And marked the east awaken into scorn,
And rush upon us. Then we set our teeth
To force a dangerous passage, and essayed
The steep slope not in vain. We pushed our way
Slowly and careworn down the icy ridge,
Hewing with ponderous strokes the riven ice
In little flakes and chips, and now again
Encountered strange and fearsome sentinels,
Gray pinnacles of lightening-riven rock
Fashioned of fire and night. We clomb adown
Fantastic cliffs of gnarled stone, and saw
The vivid lightening flare in purple robes
Of flame along the ridge, and even heard
Its terrible crackle, ‘mid the sullen roar
Of answering thunder. Now the driven hail
Beat on our faces, while we strove to fling
Aloft the axe of forged steel, encased
In glittering ice, and smite unceasingly
On the unyielding slope of ice, as black
As those most imminent ghosts of Satan’s frown
That shut us out from heaven, while the snow
Froze on our cheeks. Thus then we gained the field
Where precipice and overwhelming rock,
Avalanche, crag, leap through the dazzled air
To pile their mass in one Lethean plain
Of undulations of rolled billowy snow
Rent, seamed, and scarred with wound on jagged wound,
Blue-rushing to the vague expanse below
Of the unknown secrecies of mountain song.
Dragging behind us beautiful weary limbs,
We turned snow-blinded eyes towards the pass*
That shot a jasper wall above the mist
Into the lightening-kindled firmament,
Behind whose battlements a shelter** lay,
Rude-built of pine, whose parents in the storm
Of some vast avalanche were swept away
Into the valley. Thither we hastened on,
And there, as night stretched out a broken wing
Torn by the thunder and the bitter strife
Of warring flames and tempest’s wrath, we came
And flung ourselves within, and laid us down
At last to sleep; and Sleep, a veined shape
Of naked stateliness, came down to us,
And tenderly stooped down, and kissed our brows.
 
*The Monchjoch.
**The Berglihuute.

[Mysteries: Lyrical and Dramatic [1898]. Aleister Crowley Collected Works, volume I, 1905. p. 102]

 

He recalls his ascent of the Aiguilles Rouge with Morris Travers and his younger brother in the Confessions (pp. 133-134) when they made a conscious decision to climb ‘every pinnacle accurately’ and hadn’t planned for the ‘breakdown of the younger Travers from fatigue.’ He says that a ‘bitterly cold wind was blowing from the north-west, so that we could not pass the night on the ridge or on that side of it. We had to find shelter on the eastern face. It was too dark to get down the cliffs, even if young Travers had been equal to the effort, and they were very steep. There was not even a reasonable ledge.

However, we found a chimney where the boy could rest in moderate comfort and there was a sort of shelf which accommodated his brother. As for me, the best repose I could find was to wedge myself across the chimney with one foot, my back against a steep patch of snow; the warmth of my body melted this and the water trickled down. As my knickerbockers had been torn to pieces on the rock, there was a certain degree of discomfort connected with my night’s rest and the strain on my leg somehow damaged the knee joint, which used continually to give trouble for years afterwards. But I was so tired that I went to sleep with my pipe in my mouth. It is extraordinary that I did not fall – the pipe did.’

Crowley returned to Cambridge for the Michaelmas term which began on Thursday 1st October 1896. A few days later, on Monday12th October, Crowley turned 21 and came into his inheritance, a small fortune of around £45,000.

 

STOCKHOLM

 

When term ended on Saturday 19th December 1896, Crowley travelled to Stockholm, no doubt intending to enjoy his new found wealth, and stayed at the Grand Hotel; on Tuesday 29th December he had been ice-skating for three hours and began to feel tired; he attempted a skating manoeuvre, quite badly and falls on the ice. A man stepped forward to assist him and Crowley, who had been feeling lonely, is glad to hear the English tongue. The man introduces himself as James L. Dickson and Crowley felt a strange attraction towards him. They dined together that night and the following night, Wednesday 30th December, Crowley dined with him and on the following day, New Year’s Eve, Thursday 31st December, after Crowley had dined with Dickson, the latter seduced Crowley, who did not resist this new, strong and ‘sinful’ experience. At midnight, Crowley became ‘awakened to the knowledge’ as he says in his Confessions (pp. 123-124) ‘that I possessed a magical means of becoming conscious of and satisfying a part of my nature which had up to that moment concealed itself from me. It was an experience of horror and pain, combined with a certain ghostly terror, yet at the same time it was the key to the purest and holiest spiritual ecstasy that exists.’ He goes on to say that (p. 124) that it was an ‘isolated experience, not repeated until exactly twelve months later, to the minute.’ The experience came as a sudden revelation to Crowley and he speaks about it in his poem ‘At Stockholm’ addressed to ‘J. L. D.’:

We could not speak, although the sudden glow
Of passion mantling to the crimson cheek
 
Of either, told our tale of love, although
We could not speak.
 
What need of language, barren and false and bleak,
While our white arms could link each other so,
And found red lips their partner’s mutely seek?
 
What time for language, when our kisses flow
Eloquent, warm, as words are cold and weak?
 
Or now – Ah! sweetheart, even were it so
We could not speak.

Also the poem- ‘To J. L.D.’:

 

At last, so long desired, so long delayed,
The step is taken, and the threshold past;
I am within the palace I have prayed
At last.
 
Like scudding winds, when skies are overcast,
Came the soft breath of Love, that might not fade.
O Love, whose magic whispers bind me fast.
 
O Love, who hast the kiss of Love betrayed,
Hide my poor blush beneath thy pinions vast,
Since thou hast come, nor left me more a maid,
At last. (38)

Crowley was then in Copenhagen where he wrote the beautiful poem, ‘Astray in her Paths’ (January 1897) in which he gives poetic wings to his recent revelation of a new passionate love, that of man with man, and elevates it beyond mortal love itself – ‘… because we love, / are not of earth, but, as the immortals, stand / with eyes immutable; our souls are fed / on a strange new nepenthe from the cup / of the vast firmament. Nor do we dream, / nor think we aught of the transient world, / but are absorbed in our own deity’. Crowley reaches a sublime and tender beauty, an honesty which only youth can prevail upon –

But now I turn to thee, whose eyes
Blaze on me with such look as flesh and blood
May never see and live; for so it burns
Into the innest being of the spirit
And stains its vital essence with a brand
Of fire that shall not change; and shuddering I
Gaze back, spirit to spirit, with the like
Insatiable desire, that never quenched,
Nor lessened by sublime satiety,
But rather crescent, hotter with the flame
Of its own burning, that consumes it not,
Because it is the pure white flame of God.
I shudder, holding thee to me: thy gaze
Is still on me; a thousand years have passed,
And yet a thousand thousand; years they are
As men count years, and yet we stand and gaze
With touching hands and lips immutable
As mortals stand a moment; …
The universe is One: One Soul, One Spirit,
One Flame, One infinite God, One infinite Love.

 [Mysteries: Lyrical and Dramatic. 1898. Collected Works, volume I, pp.119-120]

 

Crowley would have returned to Cambridge for the Lent term which began on Friday 8th January 1897. The Easter term ended on Thursday 24th June 1897, and Crowley went to St Petersburg to learn Russian for the Diplomatic service which he had chosen as a career – he did not get very far in the language – and on his return he broke his journey at Berlin to attend a chess conference, this was the Berlin Chess Tournament held at the Architektenhaus in Berlin from Monday 13th September to Tuesday 4th October 1897 (39) and he says he was immediately ‘seized with what may justly be described as a mystical experience’; he saw the futility of chess masters and knew that he was destined for greater things – ‘I perceived with praetor-natural lucidity that I had not alighted on this planet with the object of playing chess.’ (Confessions. p. 140)

In 1897, ‘Mr. E. Aleister Crowley ascended the Pic Coolidge, and crossed the Breche de la Meije in the Dauphine, and afterwards proceeded to Arolla, traversed without guides the Aig.de la Za (descending the rock face) and Mont Collon (by N. N. E. arête, descent by W. face).’ (40) He is staying at the Hotel Mont Collon with Morris Travers and his cousin Gregor Grant. Of the Breche de la Meije, he recalls in his Confessions (p. 137) that he was crossing the Meije ‘with a porter. About half way down the rocky slopes (we had taken off the rope) I stopped for a few minutes for personal reasons, never imagining that the boy would get himself into trouble. When I got up he had disappeared. I shouted and he replied. I then saw that he had done an incredibly rash action. By going on, entirely out of the way, he had crossed a narrow gully which was being constantly swept by ice from a hanging glacier. I could not leave him alone on the mountain and I could not ask him to risk his life by returning. There was nothing for it but to repeat his indiscretion. The only way across the gully was a steep slab, polished by ice and constantly bombarded. I had to rush it, at the gravest risk of slipping on the one hand and being smashed on the other.’

Gregor Grant joined him as he says in his Confessions (p. 133) he ‘took his cousin Gregor, who by this time was married and had discovered that his life was not worth keeping [he married in March 1899, so Crowley must be mistaken here]. We made the second ascent of the north-north-east ridge of Mont Collon. It is a long and severe climb. The conditions were very bad and Gregor was quite unequal to this class of climbing, so that I had to pull him up most of the way. We were very late on the mountain in consequence. I had no idea of the best way down, but decided to try the short and precipitous route which leads to the level glacier above the Vuibez Seracs… we got down the steep part, safely enough, just before dark.

We took off the rope to descend some slopes covered with loose rock. As I sat down to coil the rope I realised that I was completely exhausted, though mentally rather than physically. My brain played me a curious trick. Gregor had reached a patch of broken rocks at the bottom of the slope and I followed him slowly. Suddenly I saw a troll, one of those funny little dwarfs with pointed caps and formidable beards that one sees pictured in German fairy stories and on beer mugs (Heinzelmannchen appears to be the official name). This creature was hopping about the rocks in a very jovial way. He appeared quite real in every respect. For instance, he was not transparent. But it never occurred to me to believe in him. I put him down to cerebral fatigue. The apparition only lasted for a few minutes. He was gone before I rejoined my cousin.

It would, of course, have been madness to attempt to cross the glacier that night, the snow being very deep and soft, so we managed as best we could to keep warm. I did not sleep very much – it was my first night out. In the morning we ran across the frozen snow to the little pass which leads down to the valley. We had hardly crossed it when we met a rescue party sent up by the dear old hotel keeper, Anzevui, [Jean Anzevui (1835-1926) hotelier of Hotel Mont Collon] who had a curious personal affection for me as the bad boy of the valley who was always making things interesting. Our descent had been watched through glasses; and they had come to the conclusion that we must have met with an accident, because our route down the mountain was an original variation on the regular way and supposed to be impossible. We had, in fact, met with one exceedingly bad pitch where I was glad of the hitched rope.’ They returned to their hotel on the evening of Thursday 26th August 1897.

 

POLLITT

 

During the Michaelmas term which began in October 1897, Crowley becomes ill and was ‘forced to meditate upon the fact of mortality’ – ‘I had never given myself wholly to chess, mountaineering or even to poetry. Now, for the first time, I felt myself prepared to expend my resources of every kind to attain my purpose.’ (p.125) Later that term Crowley became acquainted with Herbert Charles Jerome Pollitt (1871-1942) who had been up at Trinity College in 1889, and the two soon became lovers.

Crowley, in the flush of a new passion for Pollitt, is also consumed by an increasing crisis of his faith, he still clings to certain beliefs that were instilled into him by his father and the Plymouth Brethren, yet there is an overwhelming desire to pursue the esoteric arts; it is the Vision of Universal Sorrow which has been growing within him since his revelation in Berlin, that he was created for something more than just playing chess, climbing mountains and writing poetry. Since entering Trinity College and experiencing real freedom from the constraints and restrictions of Christianity, he feels there is a lack of substance and purpose to that freedom which has become meaningless. That December, on Tuesday 7th, he visits the house of his Professor friend, Dr. Charles George Lamb (1867-1941), the Cambridge lecturer and engineer who entered the university in 1891. That wild and windy night in December must have had considerable effect upon Crowley, who poured out his heartfelt feelings to Professor Lamb concerning his spiritual dilemma. In the introduction to his poem Aceldama (1898) he writes rather vaguely of the encounter, saying ‘how the grave old Professor wondered at my ravings! I had called at his house, for he was a valued friend of mine, and I felt strange thoughts and emotions shake within me. Ah! how I raved! I called to him to trample me, he would not. We passed together into the stormy night. I was on horseback, how I galloped round him in my phrenzy, till he became the prey of a real physical fear! How I shrieked out I know not what strange words! And the poor good old man tried all he could to calm me; he thought I was mad! The fool! I was in the death struggle with self: God and Satan fought for my soul those three long hours. God conquered – now I have only one doubt left – which of the twain was God?’

Michaelmas term ended on Sunday 19th December 1897, and Crowley went to Amsterdam and he wrote romantic homoerotic poetry in a little red notebook he purchased there (41).

 

He who seduced me first I could not forget.
I hardly loved him but desired to taste
A new strong sin. My sorrow does not fret
That sore. But thou, whose sudden arms embraced
 
My shrinking body, and who brought a blush
Into my cheeks, and turned my veins to fire,
Thou, who didst whelm me with the eager rush
Of the enormous floods of thy desire,
Thine are the kisses that devour me yet,
Thine the high heaven whose loss is death to me,
Thine all the barbed arrows of regret,
Thine on whose arms I yearn to be
In my deep heart thy name is writ alone,
Men shall decipher – when they split the stone.

 

On Thursday 23rd December 1897, while in Amsterdam, he is on the threshold of one of the greatest spiritual conflicts of his life, for he has been walking the streets all day and watching the sun pass overhead and ‘fade away / to other streets, and other passengers, / see him take pleasure where the heathen pray,’. Crowley is tired and weary and his mind is in torment. The day has been long and there is a frost sparkling along the streets as he wound his way towards the docks; from the darkness of his inner sorrow he holds his silver crucifix in his fingers and contemplates ‘the wound / stabbed in the flanks of my dear silver Christ.’ Crowley feels the loneliness of Christ at the hour of death- he puts the crucifix to his mouth and kisses the ‘silver lips’ as if in farewell, for ever. He puts the crucifix away and his ‘feet must go / some journey of despair.’ He has come through the dark night of his soul which probably began with that memorable night at the home of Professor Lamb to find that which he had known all along; and he must walk and ‘know never more the day and night apart, / know not where frost has laid his iron hand /save only that it fastens on my heart; / save only that it grips with icy fire / these veins no fire of hell could satiate; / save only that it quenches this desire. / Let me out beyond the city gate.’ [The Goad. Songs of the Spirit. 1898. Collected Works volume I, p. 30]

Two days later, on Saturday 25th December 1897, still in Amsterdam, he wrote the poem ‘The Nativity’ (also contained in the Amsterdam Notebook under the title ‘Xmas’). In the poem we find the Virgin Mary at Bethlehem, in labour, and ‘each spasm is a holocaust’, and thrice she has ‘cursed the name of God’ and thrice she has ‘prayed that she may die’ until ‘she is delivered of the Christ’ [Oracles.1905. Collected Works, volume II, pp. 14-15]

In Amsterdam, Crowley realises that he is in love with Jerome and the two write furiously to each other. On Crowley’s return he met Pollitt at the Queen’s Hotel, Birmingham on Friday 31st December 1897, New Year’s Eve, exactly a year after he had been seduced by James L. Dickson, and the seduction repeated itself almost to the minute when Pollitt and Crowley became lovers.

The Lent term began in January 1898 and Crowley moved from his rooms at 35, Sidney Street to 14, Trinity Street and during the Easter term that year he and Jerome were quite inseparable; their relationship lasted six months. (42) Crowley had several of his poems published in the Cambridge magazine Granta, such as: ‘Ballade of the Mutability of Human Affairs’ (26th February 1898, p.223), ‘Ballade of Bad Verses’ (30th April 1898, p. 271) and ‘A Sonnet of Spring Fashions’ (21st May 1898, p. 236).

Crowley must be mistaken when he says that he and Pollitt are at Wastdale Head in July 1898 as during that month he is climbing in the Alps, and even Crowley can’t be in two places at once! The Visitor Book of the Wastwater Hotel records Crowley, as staying there from Monday 14th March to Monday 18th April. He says that he and Pollitt, walked over the fells together but Crowley could ‘never persuade him to do any rock climbing.’ Pollitt’s name is not recorded in the Wastwater Hotel visitor book so it is likely he was staying at his parent’s home in Kendal, Thorny Hills, 7, Kent Terrace and travelled the thirty-five miles to Wastdale; his father, Charles Pollitt, is the owner of the Westmorland Gazette. Crowley hints in his ‘Not the Life of Sir Roger Bloxam’ that Crowley went to ‘the Lake where Hippolytus [Pollitt] had his palace’. Crowley was reading The Cloud upon the Sanctuary by Karl von Eckhartshausen (1752-1803) and he ‘appealed with the whole force of my will to the adepts of the Hidden Church to prepare me as a postulant for their august company.’ (Confessions. p. 148) During that vacation Crowley met the climber Oscar Eckenstein (1859-1921) who was staying at the Wastwater Hotel from Friday 1st – Friday 29th April and they ‘did a few climbs together’ and ‘made a sort of provisional agreement to undertake an expedition to the Himalayas when occasion offered.’ (p. 151) Eckenstein’s friend and fellow climber, the mechanical engineer, Lucien Alphonse Legros (1865-1933) was also staying at the hotel from Thursday 7th – Wednesday 20th April and on Crowley’s final day before checking out on the 18th April, he and Crowley famously entered their Y-Boulder guide (Legros supplying the numbered diagram) with their 22 routes upon the boulder, which is about a mile away from the hotel in Mosedale, in the visitor’s book. (43)

It must be during this Easter stay at Wastdale that he writes his Epilogue to his poem The Tale of Archaise (1898) which was published in January 1899 and is included in his Collected Works of 1905 (volume I, pp. 27-28) – it was written ‘in Hollow Stones, Scawfell’ and begins:

 

‘Blind the iron pinnacles edge the twilight;
Blind and black the ghylls of the mountain clefted,
Crag and snow-clad slope in a distant vision
Rise as before me.
 
Here (it seems) my feet by a tiny torrent
Press the moss with a glad delight of being:
Here my eyes lookup to the riven mountain
Split by the thunder.
 
Rent and rifted, shattered of wind and lightning,
Smitten, scarred, and stricken of sun and tempest,
Seamed with wounds, like adamant, shod with iron,
Torn by the earthquake.’

The poem culminates in dramatic mood, as – ‘Darkness falls like dewfall about the hillsides; / Night is upon me.

Now to me remain in the doubtful twilight
Stretches bare of flower, but touched with whispers,
Grey with huddled rocks, and a space of woodland,
Pine trees and poplar.
 
Now a stream to ford and a stile to clamber;
Last the inn, a book, and a quiet corner…
Fresh as Spring, there kisses me on the forehead
Sleep, like a sister.’

 

Crowley was back in Cambridge to finish his final May term (he left without taking his degree) before secretly setting off for Maidenhead and checking into the Bear Hotel to write his tragic poem ‘Jezebel’. He had made up his mind to end the relationship with Pollitt and pursue the spiritual quest of the Hidden Masters. In his Confessions (pp. 148-149) he says of his sojourn in Maidenhead that ‘I only told one person – in strictest confidence – where I was going; but Pollitt found out that person and forced him to tell my secret. He walked into the room shortly after dinner, to my surprise and rage – for when I am writing a poem I would show Azrael himself the door!’ Crowley explains that he has chosen to devote his life to religion and that there was no place for him in his life anymore and they parted never to meet again. He regretted his decision for the rest of his life.

 

To die amid the blossoms of the frost
On far fair heights; to sleep the quiet sleep
Of dead men underneath the snowy steep
Of many mountains; ever to have lost
These cares and these distrusts; to lie alone,
Watched by the distant eagle’s drowsy wing,
Stars and grey summits, and the winds that sing
Slow dirges in eternal monotone.
 
Such is my soul’s desire, being weary of
This vain eternity of sleepless dreams
That is my life; what there still may be
In other worlds, the hope of other love
Than this that floods my veins with poisonous streams,
And wastes with wan desire the soul of me.

[Jezebel: and Other Tragic Poems. 1899. Epilogue. Collected Works, volume I, p. 135]

 

A SPIRITUAL AWAKENING

 

Following this great tragedy, Crowley sets off for an excursion in the Alps and while in Paris, he reconsiders his feelings for Pollitt and decides to write a letter of apology to him which he posts from the Gare de Lyon; either the letter goes astray and Pollitt does not receive it or he does and fails to act on it, whichever, the finest and noblest friendship of Crowley’s life is terminated.

Crowley, who has not felt in the best of health all summer, went to Zermatt to rest and read Mathers’ volume ‘The Kabbalah Unveiled’. He was staying at the Hotel Monte Rosa in Zermatt during July and August 1898 and one night in the local beer hall was talking about alchemy to an assembled party of climbers, one of whom was there during August, was the analytical and consulting chemist, Julian Levett Baker (1873-1958) who ‘took me aside’ he says in Confessions (p. 164) ‘when the group broke up and walked back to the hotel with me.’ Baker was staying at the same hotel – ‘He was himself a real practical alchemist – I don’t know whether he had been fooled by my magpie display of erudition. He may simply have deduced that a boy, however vain and foolish, who had taken so much pains to read up the subject, might have a really honest interest after all; and he took me seriously.’ Crowley believes this may be the Master he called for during Easter at Wastdale Head or may be able to put him in contact with one. ‘That night I resolved to renew my acquaintance with Baker in the morning and tackle him seriously about the intricate question which lay close about my heart.’ But the next morning Crowley wakes late for breakfast to find Baker has already checked out of the hotel and Crowley sets about furiously telegraphing for him ‘all over the valley. He was located at the Gorner Grat. I sped up the mountain to find him. Again he had gone. I rushed back. In vain I hunted him through the hotels and at the railway station. At last I got a report that an Englishman corresponding to his description had started to walk down the valley to Brigue. I hurled myself headlong in pursuit. This time I was rewarded. I caught up with him some ten miles below Zermatt. I told him of my search for the Secret Sanctuary of the Saints and convinced him of my desperate earnestness. He hinted that he knew of an Assembly which might be that for which I was looking… I got him to promise to meet me in London. He added, ‘I will introduce you to a man who is much more of a Magician than I am.’ (pp. 164-165)

Crowley wrote a dedicatory poem to J. L. Baker in his volume of poems Songs of the Spirit (1898), also in the Collected Works (volume I. p. 29), its second verse reads:

‘Thine was the forehead mild and grave
That shone throughout the azure nave
Where Monte Rosa’s silence gave
The starry organ’s measured sound.
Where for an altar stood the bare
Mass of Mont Cervin*, towering there;
And angels dwelt upon the stair,
And all the mountains were aware that stood around.’
 
*The Matterhorn.

Also at the Hotel Monte Rosa were Oscar Eckenstein during August 1898 and his climbing companion, Guy Knowles (1879-1959), of Trinity College, Cambridge, from July-August and they climbed the Weisshorn, Lyskamm, Dent Blanche and the Matterhorn; Guy would later, in 1902, along with Eckenstein and Crowley, attempt to make the first ascent of the world’s second highest mountain in the Himalayas, K2.

The Scottish Mountaineering Club Journal says that in July 1898, ‘Mr. E. Aleister Crowley was camping with friends above the snow-line during the whole month of July in very indifferent weather. The tents were pitched below the Dent Blanche, beside the Schonbuhl Glacier, at a height of 11,500 feet.’ (44) In his Confessions (p. 155) Crowley says: ‘We [Crowley and Eckenstein] arranged to spend the summer in a tent on the Schonbuhl glacier under the Dent Blanche, primarily with the idea of fitting me for the Himalayan expedition, and secondly with that of climbing the east face of the Dent Blanche by a new route which he had previously attempted with Zurbriggen [Matthias Zurbriggen (1856-1917)].’

One incident that occurred that climbing season in the Alps was the death of four people that August who ‘died while climbing near Arolla in Switzerland’. Crowley says in his Confessions (p. 99) that he, Morris Travers and his younger brother [Ernest Frank Travers], decided to try the ascent of the Petite Dent de Veisivi [10,466 feet] ‘by the gap facing Arolla’ – ‘the local guides, however, unanimously denied that this route had ever been done. The rocks below the gap, they said, were overhanging and were impossible. We decided to test these statements, ascended the mountain by the ordinary way and came down by the route in question. The rocks do overhang, but the holds are so good that the climb is quite easy.’ Crowley discussed the route with the son of the climber John Hopkinson, saying that there ‘was no difficulty or danger for a responsible party.’ Professor John Hopkinson F.R.S. (1840-1898) was staying with his family at the Hotel du Mont Collon in Arolla and Professor Hopkinson’ started from Arolla on Saturday morning [27th August], with his son [18 year old John Gustave Robinson] and two daughters [Alice Robinson, 23, and Lina Evelyn Robinson 19], to ascend the Petite Dent de Veisivi, one of the striking points dominating Evolina, in the Val d’Herens, running south from the Rhone Valley at Sion. The ascent is not considered a very dangerous one, and the party went without guides. Nothing having been seen of them on Saturday night, search parties were organised, and the melancholy discovery was made that a catastrophe had occurred, the dead bodies of Dr. Hopkinson and his three children being found roped together, but terribly mutilated, at the foot of the highest cliffs.’ (45) Crowley adds in his Confessions that the ‘widow [Evelyn Hopkinson] begged Travers, who was a member of the rescue party (I had left the valley), to allow her to take a last look at her husband’ but ‘all the remains had been brought down in one sack; no one could tell what was whose.’ Morris Travers, was staying at the same hotel as the Hopkinson party, the Hotel du Mont Collon in Arolla and he, with local guides such as Pierre Maitre and other climbers staying in Arolla, found the bodies the next day, Sunday 28th August; the bodies were removed on Monday 29th August. Crowley wrote his poem, ‘Elegy’ for Hopkinson [Mysteries: Lyrical and Dramatic.1898, see Collected Works, volume I, p. 127] in which he says it was a ‘year of barren summer, when the wind / blew from the south unlooked-for snow, / they year when Collon, desolate and blind, / gloomed on the vale below,’ and ends with the final verses:

The mountains that you loved have taken you,
And we who love you will not weep.
Shall we begrudge? Your last look saw sky blue;
You will be glad to sleep.
 
Your pure names (thine renowned, yours with fresh youth
And full of promise) shall be kept
Still in our hearts for monuments of truth,
As if you had not slept.

 

THE GOLDEN DAWN

 

On his return from Switzerland Crowley resides at the Hotel Cecil in London and writes his poem ‘Jephtah’ (published July 1899) and most of the poems in that volume and then rents a flat at 67 and 69 Chancery Lane in London. Julian Baker kept his word and met Crowley and introduced him to George Cecil Jones (1873-1953) – the secret assembly turned out to be the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn magical society in which Baker had been initiated into on Saturday 16th June 1894, and Jones on Friday 12th July 1895. Crowley was initiated into the Order on Friday 18th November 1898 at the Isis-Urania Temple, Mark Mason’s Hall, Great Queen Street, London.

That December Crowley is seemingly still bitter over Pollitt and on Wednesday 28th December, the night of the ‘eclipse’ he writes two sonnets ‘to the author of the phrase: “I am not a gentleman and I have no friends.”’  The first, beginning hurtfully – ‘Self-damned, the leprous moisture of thy veins / sickens the sunshine, and thine haggard eyes, / bleared with their own corrupting infamies, / glare through the charnel-house of earthly pains,’ and ends rather venomously – ‘self-damned on earth, live out thy tortured days, / that men may look upon thy face, and see / how vile a thing of woman born may be. / Then, we are done with thee; go, go thy ways / to other hells, thou damned of God hereafter, / ‘mid men’s contempt and hate and pitiless laughter.’  It is really quite spiteful and childish of Crowley and shows to what extent he was hurt by the severing of the relationship by his own hand, for the pain stayed with him for the rest of his life. The second sonnet is just as relentless in its bitter anger, condemning him to hell, ‘without a friend, thy eternal place / sweats through the painting of thy harlot’s face.’ Crowley appends a note to the sonnets, saying ‘the virulence of these sonnets is excusable when it is known that their aim was to destroy the influence in Cambridge of a man who headed in that University a movement parallel to that which at Oxford was associated with Oscar Wilde. They had their effect.’ [Mysteries: Lyrical and Dramatic. 1898. Collected Works, volume I, pp. 115-116]

Not long after this, around January 1899, Crowley meets the distinguished magician, Allan Bennett at one of the ceremonies of the Golden Dawn and after Crowley pays a visit to him, seeing he is in financial difficulty and living in squalor, he invites him to stay with him at his flat and Bennett teaches Crowley the subtle art of evocation and astral travel.

In July 1899 there appeared an article in the Pall Mall Gazette concerning the fatalities at Beachy Head (‘the fourth since Easter’) in which Aleister Crowley was interviewed. The Gazette representative found Crowley, ‘of the Scottish Mountaineering Club, who is described in Messrs. W. P. H. Smith and H. C. Hart’s “Climbing in the British Isles” as the authority on Beachy Head, the possibilities of which as a climbing resort he was the first to develop… preparing for Switzerland and the Tyrol, where he proposes to attempt some hitherto maiden peaks and very ready to dilate on the subject of Beachy Head and its unnecessarily long record of fatalities, having climbed there so recently as the week after Whitsuntide, when two persons net death upon its treacherous chalk.’ Crowley compares the difficulties of Beachy Head ‘with more ambitious mountaineering’ and ‘affords everything you get in the Alps.’ He blames climbers for not knowing the rudiments of climbing, especially on chalk and goes on to boast that ‘there are no more than twenty men in England who know the rudiments of climbing’, presumably including himself among them. he then goes on to name the ‘principle climbers who have done the Head’ as ‘Mr. H. S. Bullock, of the Climbers’ Club, Mr. Walter Weston, the Rev. A. C. Downer, and Mr. J. S. New, who helped me to make a map of the Head.’ Asked what precautions may prevent further fatalities, he suggests that ‘the only preventative measure I can recommend is that notice-boards should be erected at places where the descent appears easy; and that instead of these boards bearing merely a vague warning, they should contain particulars of the numbers of persons who have been actually killed there.’ He concludes by saying ‘failing this, I suppose, tourists and trippers will continue to meet with violent deaths there, or at best to be rescued in their hundreds by the local coastguardsmen.’ (46)

The climbing in the Alps the article refers to was Crowley and Oscar Eckenstein’s alpine training at high altitude at Montanvers in the Mont Blanc massif. Also climbing in the region was the climber Dr. Tom George Longstaff (1875-1964), who was later on the 1922 Mount Everest expedition, who recalled in his autobiography, This my voyage’ [New York. Charles Scribner’s Sons. 1950] that on Thursday 24th August 1899, Eckenstein and Crowley gave him an ‘introduction of ice-claws, crampons, amongst British mountaineers; he [Eckenstein] even claimed that their use made the regulation ice-axe unnecessary.’ (p. 23)

They climbed the Aiguille du Geant and Crowley made a solo first climb of the Mer de Glace; he says in his Confessions (p. 215) that Eckenstein feeling unwell was unable to climb with him so ‘I had arranged to go with Longstaff and his two guides over the Col du Geant. Not feeling very fit myself, I thought I would start an hour ahead of the others. Having inspected the ice fall, I found a way straight up. When I was about half way through the seracs, I heard Longstaff’s guides yelling blue murder. I had taken the ‘wrong’ way. Their route involved a detour of a mile or more. I took no notice of their friendly anxiety and reached the top a long way in advance. When they arrived, they explained that what I had done was impossible. To carry on the joke, when we got back I offered a hundred and fifty francs to any party that would repeat the climb by my route. Nobody did so.’  Crowley composed a poem as he crossed the Col du Geant by himself before meeting up with Longstaff and his guides – The Mountain Christ: ‘Strange! how a certain fear possesses me / alone amid their crag-bound solitude.’ The poem reflects Crowley’s soul at the time, in spiritual torment and torn between the angelic and the demonic – ‘Yea! For the worship of my secret song / vibrates through every chasm of the world: / its sound is caught by angels, and made strong!’ and ends in triumphant vision:

 

O visionary valley of my Soul!
When shall thy beauty, even thine, be made
Aspure and mighty as these hills that roll
In mist and sun and shade?
O thou! the Highest! make my will as thine,
My consciousness, the consciousness divine!

[The Temple of the Holy Ghost. 1901. Collected Works, volume I, pp. 205-206]

 

Longstaff said of Crowley that he was ‘a poet and later a notorious master of Black Magic. At that time, as Laird of Boleskine, he chose to wear full Highland dress, complete with eagle’s feather, on all occasions. But he was a fine climber, if an unconventional one. I have seen him go up the dangerous and difficult right (true) side of the great ice fall of the Mer de Glace below the Geant alone, just for a promenade. Probably the first and perhaps the only time this mad, dangerous and difficult route had been taken.’ (p. 24)

In November 1899, Crowley purchased his Scottish home by Loch Ness, Boleskine House where he retired to that December to prepare for the Operation of the Sacred Magic of Abramelin. His life from that moment onwards would be a whirlwind of enchantment, romance and evocations, but always in his heart were the mountains and the song of poetry; once he had cast off the shadow of his boyhood, restricted by the Brethren’s tight grip, he became Alastor, the spirit of solitude, the wanderer in the waste.

 

Oh! heavenly frozen fountains!
O! Nature! vastly grand!
Come! sing upon the mountains
The song of Freedom’s land!

[The Alps. In Residence. Aleister Crowley.1904. p. 48] 

 

 

NOTES:

 

  1. Malvern Register, 1897.p. 253. [House: Huntingdon, Class: Shell, Lower 5th] His address is recorded as Oak View, Polworth Road, Streatham. Tonbridge School Register, 1820-1893. (1893). p. 273. Crowley had accommodation in the historic (1732) Ferox Hall boarding house.
  2. Streatham News. Saturday 7th May 1892. p. 5; also the Star (London), Friday 29th April 1892. p. 3 and the Norwood Review and Crystal Palace Reporter. Saturday 7th May 1892. p. 5.
  3. See also the ‘CMS Extracts from the Annual Letters of the Missionaries for the year 1897’. Part VI. London. 1898. Rev. Fothergill’s letter gives a detailed account of his missionary and teaching accomplishments in the Punjab, pp. 278-280. It is worth mentioning two of Clifford’s brothers: Claude Francis Fothergill (1878-1955) of Emmanuel College, Cambridge (October1898), BA 1901, {Medicine, BC 1906, MB 1907], Lieutenant in the Great War (R.A.M.C.) and Leslie Francis Fothergill (1880-1903) of Emmanuel College, Cambridge (October 1899), BA 1902, Guy’s Hospital; he died of typhoid in London on 8th December 1903.
  4. Newspaper visitor lists have Mrs. Crowley of Streatham and her son, and Gregor Grant, of Bexley Heath, Kent, staying in Callandar from 6th August 1892 to the end of August, possibly staying at Craigmore guest house [Callander Advertiser, Saturday 6th August 1892, p 1; Saturday 13th August, p. 1, Saturday 20th August, p. 1], this would have been several months after young Crowley’s first appearance in court at Lambeth on Friday 29th April 1892 and entering Tonbridge in May. The previous year, Crowley was with his mother at Ilfracombe, Devon from the 8th to the end of August, staying at the Royal Clarence Hotel [Ilfracombe Chronicle, Saturday 8th August, p. 5, Saturday 22nd August 1891, p. 6, Saturday 22nd August, p. 6, Saturday 29th August, p. 6]
  5. Crowley’s tutor Dr. Frederick Augustine Robinson, born Liverpool in 1870 and matriculating at Christ’s Church, Cambridge in 1893, is the son of Reverend George Robinson (1819-1881) and Henrietta Cecilia Forbes (1826-1919) who were married in 1854. Crowley does not name him in his Confessions but does say he ‘is the brother of the Dean of Westminster’ who was Rev. Joseph Armitage Robinson (1858-1933), Dean of Westminster from 1902-1911. He says of Frederick A. Robinson, after his tutoring ended, that he ‘invited me over to his mother’s house at Maze Hill [Greenwich] to spend the night, and did his best to live up to the reputation of the cloth. I did not allow him to succeed, not because I could see no sin in it, but because I thought it was a trap to betray me to my family.’ [Confessions. p. 72] Crowley goes a little further in his volume The World’s Tragedy (1910), saying how the Dean may ‘still be ignorant of how that brother Fred (one of my tutors) attempted to seduce me in his own mother’s house at Maze Hill. This came a little later; and I knew exactly what he was doing, as it happened. I let him go as far as he did, with the deliberate intention of making sure on that point.’
  6. Around 1890-91 when Crowley was 15 years old he was staying in Wales with his tutor at Llyn Idwal Farm in Snowdonia where he was laid up in bed with measles; he was much taken by the gloomy prospect of Llyn Idwal Lake and the Twll Ddu nearby. It was here, suffering in bed, that he wrote his early poem ‘The Balloon’ (see Olla, pp. 28-29). Richard Kaczynsky notes in his Perdurabo – The Life of Aleister Crowley (2002) [revised and expanded edition, 2010, p. 573, footnote 125] that his ‘application to the Scottish Mountaineering Club records ascents as early as summer 1890, for Ben Vane (3,002 feet), Ben Cruachan (3,694 feet) and the highest mountain in the British Isles, Ben Nevis 94,402 feet). Likewise, in August, the month prior to meeting Lister at Skye, Crowley had also climbed the following Scottish peaks: Ben Ledi (2,884 feet), Ben A’an (1,488 feet), Ben Vorlich (Loch Earn, 3,232 feet), Ben More (Crianlarich, 3,852 feet), Ben Lawers (3,983 feet), Ben Lui (3,707 feet), Ben Oss (3,376 feet), and Beinn Dubhchraig (3,209 feet)’. [footnote 130] – April/May 1893 climbs in Snowdonia: ‘Tryfan (3,002 feet), GlyderFach (3,261 feet), Glyder Fawr (3,278 feet), Y Garn (Glyderau) (3,107 feet), Foel Grach (3,202 feet), the Craig Yr Ysfa ridge, Carnedd Dafydd (3,425 feet), Carnedd Llewelyn (3,491 feet), Yr Elen (3,156 feet), Pen yr Helgi Du (2,733 feet), Y Lliwedd (2,946 feet), the Twill Ddu cliff of Colqwen y Geifr, and the highest mountain in Wales, Snowdon (3,560 feet). That June (and laterthat September) 1893 he visited the Lake District for the following Cumbrian ascents: Helvellyn (3,117 feet), Dollywagon Pike (2,815 feet), Harrison Stickle (2,415 feet), Stickle Pike (1,230 feet), Thunacar Knott (2,372 feet), High WhiteStones (High Raise, Langdale) (2,500 feet), Sergeant Man (2,415 feet), Skiddaw (3,054 feet), Helvellyn Lower Man (3,035 feet), Bowfell (2,959 feet), Great End (2,986 feet), Ill Crag (3,068 feet), Broad Crag (3,064 feet), Scafell Pike (3,209 feet), ScaFell (3,163 feet), Pillar (2,927 feet), Great Gable (2,949 feet), Pike o’ Blisko (2,313 feet), Crinkle Crags (2,818 feet), ShelterCrags (2,673 feet), Bowfell (2,959 feet), Hanging Knott (2,828 feet), Rossett Crag 92,136 feet) and Pavey Ark (2,288 feet).’ Kaczynsky gives a note of thanks to ‘Clint Warren, Scottish Mountaineering Club archivist Robin Campbell, and William Breeze for Crowley’s SMC application.’
  7. Eastbourne Gazette, Wednesday 24th January 1894. p. 3. Crowley also had several chess problems printed in periodicals: The Albany Evening Journal (1893) – 7th January, 28th January, 11th February, 18th March, 19th August, and in The Field – 5th August 1893.
  8. Eastbourne Gazette, Wednesday 31st January 1894.p. 7.
  9. Eastbourne Gazette, Wednesday 7th March 1894. p. 3.
  10. Eastbourne Gazette, Wednesday 21st March 1894. p. 2.
  11. Eastbourne Gazette, Wednesday 28th March 1894.p. 3.
  12. Eastbourne Gazette, Wednesday 18th April 1894. p. 3.
  13. Eastbourne Gazette, Wednesday 30th May 1894. p.7.
  14. George Ferguson Gregor Grant, Crowley’s 2nd cousin, born in Calcutta on 12th February 1869 (Christened there on 5th September 1869) who was the son of George Gregor Grant (1839-11908), a watchmaker [1901 census] who married Emily Bertha Crowley’s [Aleister’s mother] cousin, Jessie Kate Cole (1839-1885) in Calcutta on 6th December 1865. G. F. Gregor Grant worked as a clerk in the custom’s office and was a member of the Royal Photographic Society [elected 1894, Fellow 1895] and Hon. Sec. of the Exchange Postal Negative Club, and the Scottish Mountaineering Club; he married Alice Gertrude Nettleton (born 18th April 1877), daughter of William Nettleton (1845-1921) a brewer, and Mary Ann Jane Hall, at the Emmanuel Church, Streatham Common on 18th March 1899. George and Alice had two sons: Garrow Gregor Grant, born 20th October 1900, and Fergus Colesworthy Gregor Grant, born 12th November 1906.Garrow, an architect, married Joan Adeline Wilson Collins in 1931 in Tonbridge and later, Captain Garrow Gregor Grant, who enlisted in the Royal Engineers on 8th January 1940 was captured as a prisoner of war in Singapore on 15th February 1942 (and sent to Changi prison camp, Singapore); after liberation from Japan he arrived in Liverpool on 27th October 1945. He died in Tonbridge, Kent in 1973. Fergus, also an architect, married Helen Mary Stephanie Hill in 1945 and died in Tunbridge Wells in 1984. George Ferguson Gregor Grant died in Tonbridge on 22nd October 1939 and his wife, Alice Gertrude grant died there in 1969. Addresses connected to G. F. Gregor Grant are: Tower House, Bexley Heath, Kent; ‘Aviemore’, Lucien Road, Tooting Bec Common, London; 1, Woodbury Road Mansions, Tunbridge Wells; 3, Grove Hill Gardens, Tunbridge Wells.
  15. Scottish Mountaineering Club Journal. Volume III, Number 17. May 1895. Chalk Climbing on Beachy Head by E. A. Crowley pp. 288-294 (p. 293). ‘Mummery spikes’ refers to the climber, Albert Frederick Mummery (1855-1895), celebrated Alpine mountaineer who died attempting to climb Nanga Parbat in the Himalayas.
  16. The photograph of Crowley and Grant upon the Needle and the Tooth was taken by Sidney Gibb, son of Joseph Gibbs of ‘Gibbs and Son’, chemist, 53d Terminus Road, Eastbourne, ‘who dared the most awful perils in his attempt to depict us.’ Two photographs accompany the article. SMCJ. III. 17. May 1895. p. 293.
  17. Monsieur Justin Auguste Lambert (1832-1908) and Catherine Amalie Lassing (1835-1915) – Swiss born Monsieur Justin Lambert married Catherine at St. Giles, London in 1861 and they had the following children: Emile Auguste Theodore Lambert (1862-1931), Auguste Emmanuel Lambert (1866-1951), James Rudolf Paul Lambert (1868-1906), Clara Amalie Lambert (1872-1953), Isabelle Lambert (1873-1953) and Amelia Mary Lambert, born 1875. Monsieur J. A. Lambert was Assistant Master of Trinity College, Eastbourne and Senior Master of the Junior School, teaching Modern Languages. He died in Eastbourne on 12th May 1908, aged 75.
  18. Dr. Alfred Ernest Maylard (1854-1947), surgeon, and Martin William Maylard (1856-1914), both born in Kent to Alfred Martin Maylard (1831-1872) and Ellen Mira French (1835-1915).
  19. The Alpine Journal. Volume XVII, Number CXXVIII (128). May 1895. Alpine Notes, p. 451.
  20. Eastbourne Gazette, Wednesday 1st August 1894. p. 3.
  21. Eastbourne Gazette, Wednesday 5th September 1894. p. 2.
  22. see A Magick Life by Martin Booth. London. Coronet Books. 2001. pp. 43-44.
  23. Scottish Mountaineering Club Journal. Volume III, Number 16. January 1895. p. 228.
  24. Niagara Hall, 20-25, York Street, Westminster, with its depiction of Niagara in winter opened on Saturday 5th January 1895 and was later, in January, converted into an ice rink.
  25. Duke of Orleans – Louis Phillippe Robert (1869-1926), born in England where the family had been in exile, succeeded his father, the count of Paris in 1894 and became head of the Royal family of France; his mother was the Spanish Infanta, Louise of Montpensier. Louis Phillippe was one of six children – one brother and four sisters – his eldest sister, Princess Amelia, married the King of Portugal. Prince Phillippe, the Duke of Orleans was the ‘pretender’ to the French throne from 1894 until his death and known to his followers as King Phillippe VIII.
  26. Herbert Vincent Reade (1870-1929), the well-known climbing enthusiast  who held meetings with fellow climbers in his rooms at 73, Jermyn Street, London, prior to forming the Climbing Club in 1898.
  27. The Duke of Orleans died of pneumonia in Palermo, Sicily, on Sunday 28th March 1926.
  28. Scottish Mountaineering Club Journal. Volume IV, Number 19. January 1896. Notes and Queries, p. 61. Heights in feet: Wetterlucke, 10,436 feet; Petersgrat, 10,505 feet; Eiger, 13,015 feet; Jungfrau, 13,642 feet.
  29. Some records of Crowley’s chess matches at the time are: Friday 27th March at 2 p.m. at the British Chess Club, 37, King Street, Covent Garden, London, an annual Inter-University match between Oxford and Cambridge in which Crowley won his game against H. N. Robbins (Corpus), who exceeded his time limit [The Cambridge Review, volume xvil, number 429, Thursday 30th April 1896, p. 281]; 23rd January 1897, Cambridge University Chess Club (C.U.C.C.) v Metropolitan and Crowley won against A. M. Fox [The Cambridge Review. Thursday 28th January 1897, volume xviii, number 448, p. 190] and Friday 2nd April 1897 (2-6 p.m.) at the British Chess Club where Captains of the respected Clubs, Crowley lost to E. G. Spencer-Churchill (Magdalen) [The Book of Blues, ed. Ogier Rysden. London. F. E. Robinson & Co. 1900. p. 68]
  30. Alumni Cantabridgienses, Admissions to Trinity College, Cambridge. 1913. p. 1030. There is an article which mentions Mrs. Emily B. Crowley, of ‘Coire Na Creiche, Rutford Road, Streatham’ in the Daily Telegraph & Courier (London), Saturday 17th March 1897. p. 8.
  31. Official Year Book of the Scientific & Learned Societies of Great Britain and Ireland. London. 1896. p.37.
  32. Scottish Mountaineering Club Journal. Volume IV, Number 19. January 1896. pp. 129-132.
  33. The Standard. Saturday 20th June 1896. p. 1. see also Crowley’s poem ‘In Memoriam A. J. B.’ Songs of the Spirit [1898] in The Collected Woks of Aleister Crowley, volume I. 1905. p. 31.
  34. Dr. Morris William Travers, D.Sc., F.R.S. (1872-1961) was elected a member of the Scottish Mountaineering Club at a Special General Meeting in Glasgow on Wednesday 2nd December 1896 and published several scientific volumes: An Experimental Study of Gasses. London. Macmillan and Co. Ltd. 1901; Some Compounds of Boron, Oxygen, and Hydrogen. London. H. K. Lewis & Co. 1916, and A Life of Sir William Ramsay. London. Edward Arnold Ltd. 1956. He also published many papers in scientific periodicals such as: On the state in which Helium exists in Minerals. Nature, volume 71, number 1837, 12th January 1905, pp. 248-249; The Condensation of Helium. Nature, volume 77, number 2009, 30th April 1908, pp. 606-607, and The Control of Scientific and Industrial Research. Nature, volume 104, number 2623, 5th February 1920, pp. 597-598.
  35. Scottish Mountaineering Club Journal. Volume IV, Number 22. January 1897. p. 242, ‘Excursions’.
  36. The Traverse of the Aiguilles Rouges (poem). In Residence: The Don’s Guide to Cambridge. Aleister Crowley. Cambridge. Elijah Johnson. 1904. pp. 56-58 (p. 57).
  37. Morris Travers had four younger brothers: a) Harold Paget Travers (1873-1947), Solicitor [preliminary Law examinations May 1891, finals in June 1897]; Major in the Army; he married Ethel Mary Clunn on 23rd June 1907; b) Henry Cecil Travers (1876-1958), Blundell’s School, Tiverton (like his older brother, Morris); Institution of Civil Engineers (student February 1894, passed examination in 1898; Mechanical Engineering at the Faculty of Arts, Law and Science, University College, London, 1894-1895); in the Army: Royal Artillery; married Julia Elisabeth Robson at St. Asaph, Wales in 1904; c) Dr. Ernest Frank Travers M.D. (1878-1961), medical student, St. Barts (1906);in the 1920’and 30’s was a divisional police surgeon; he married Edith Mary Kinross (1881-1975), the daughter of the Scottish composer, John Kinross (1848-1890) in Kingston in 1907; d) Wilfred Irwin Travers (1883-1954), OBE, Lt.-Col. (Royal Engineers); Uppingham School (May 1897), architect ARIBA (1906, FRIBA 1917);married Vera Patty Helsham McCausland in Wareham, Dorset in 1919. The Travis parental family home was 2, Phillimore Gardens, Kensington, London.
  38. ‘At Stockholm’ (p. 41) and ‘To J. L. D.’ (p. 66), in White Stains [Leonard Smithers. Amsterdam] (1898). See also Crowley’s Not the Life and Adventures of Roger Bloxam’ (1916-17).
  39. The Berlin Chess Tournament held at the Architektenhaus in Berlin gathered twenty of the world’s best chess masters; the winner was Rudolf Charousek (1873-1900) (Hungary) and the runners up were: 2nd – Carl August Walbrodt (1871-1902) (Germany), 3rd – Joseph Henry Blackburne (1841-1924) (England) and 4th – David Janowski (1868-1927) (Poland/France).
  40. Scottish Mountaineering Club Journal. Volume V, Number 25. January 1898. p. 40, ‘Excursions’. Pic Coolidge (12,385 feet), Breche de la Meije (11,014 feet), Aiguille de la Za (12,034 feet), Mont Collon (11,932 feet).
  41. The Amsterdam Notebook. 1898 (Crowley writes in pencil): 8 sonnets: ‘Love me or leave me’, ‘Your love is light’, ‘To pass through the pale streets’, I, who am dying for thy kiss’, ‘He, who seduced me first’, ‘A sailor’s kiss is branded’, ‘Did you speak truly?’ and ‘The old, dark evening’; there are also 6 rondels and songs, one of which is ‘The Red lips of the Octopus’.
  42. Crowley terminated the relationship with Pollitt at the Bear Hotel, Maidenhead, where he had gone to write his poem ‘Jezebel’; Pollitt had followed him there and no doubt some scene played out and Crowley called an end to the greatest and noblest friendship he had ever encountered.
  43. The 22 routes vary from the ‘Easy Way’, to the ‘The Right Slab’, ‘The South Arete, one leg each side all the way’, ‘The Overhang Arete’, ‘The Left Crack. You must not use the jammed stone’, ‘Between the Cracks, ‘The Right Crack’, ‘The North Corner’, ‘The Left Undercut, not using the Right Crack’, ‘The Right Undercut, keeping the edge’, ‘The North Corner on the face’, ‘The Steeple Ridge from the N. E.’, ‘The Left Slab not using the edge’, ‘The Easy Crack’, ‘The Middle Slab’, etc. Also staying at the Wastwater Hotel that Easter 1898 climbing season was the Manchester mountaineer and surgeon, Joseph Collier (1855-1905) who was there from Wednesday 6th – Monday 11th April; Owen Glynne Jones (1867-1899), who was there for the Easter weekend, Saturday 30th March and civil servant, William Jones Williams (1863-1949) who was at the hotel from Saturday 9th March – Monday 11th April and climbed and helped survey local gullies with O. G. Jones; they explored Scafell on Monday 11th April, descended Deep Ghyll and did a new route up Scafell Pinnacle. An interesting volume of the period is Owen Glynne Jones’s ‘Rock Climbing in the English Lake District. Cumberland. G P Abraham and Sons. 1897 [2nd ed. 1900]
  44. Scottish Mountaineering Club Journal. Volume v, Number 28. January 1899.p. 195, ‘Excursions 1898’.
  45. Nature. Volume 58, Number 1505. 1st September 1898, pp. 419-420. Professor Hopkinson, F.R.S. of Trinity College, Cambridge (1867) was a physicist and electrical engineer of King’s College, London and a member of the Alpine Club. The Alpine Journal of November 1898 says that ‘a few days before the accident she’ [Miss Alice Hopkinson] was ‘with her father and brother, without a guide’ and ‘had made the ascent of the Aiguille de la Za on the Arolla side, over the rocks all the way.’ The ‘party left the hotel at 7.30 on the morning of August 27 to climb the Petite Dent de Veisivi… the four were on one rope, the son leading, then the younger daughter, then Mr. Hopkinson, and lastly the elder daughter. A large stone was found lying on the body of the leader, and Dr. Hopkinson’s hand was grasping the rope in a way which suggests that he was trying to check the fall of one or both of those in front. The bodies had fallen about 500ft., and it was clear that death had been instantaneous in every case.’… ‘The bodies were found at daybreak on the 28th by Mr. G. T. Walker and Mr. M. Travers, who with Pierre Maitre and other guides, were searching the foot of the rocks.’ The bodies were watched over them all day and night until the inquiry was held and the bodies were removed ‘early in the morning of Monday, August 29, and the bodies were then brought down to Satarma.’[The Alpine Journal. Volume xix, Number cxlii (142). November 1898. 'Alpine Accidents in 1898’, pp. 266-267]
  46. The Pall Mall Gazette: The Fatalities at Beachy Head, an Interview with Mr. Aleister Crowley. Saturday 8th July 1899. p. 3. The four climbers he mentions are: Henry Somerset Bullock (1871-1963) of Corpus Christi College, Cambridge and member of the Alpine Club from 1897-1921; Rev. Walter Weston (1860-1940 of Clare College, Cambridge; Rev. Arthur Cleveland Downer (1847-1943) of Brasenose College, Oxford, poet and author [‘Mountaineering Ballads’. 1905] and J. S. New, of whom Crowley says in his Confessions (p. 97) that he ‘found a new climbing companion on Beach Head in a man named J. S. New. We worked out the possible climbs systematically and made a large-scale map of the cliff.’ The reference to Crowley in ‘Climbers of the British Isles’ [volume I: England] by Walter Parry Haskett Smith and Henry Chichester Hart (London. Longmans Green and Co. 1894) says in the section on Beachy Head (pp. 5-6) that ‘there is a dangerous-looking pinnacle, which was climbed (by dint of cutting a step or two) in April 1894, by Mr. E. A. Crowley.’ The same interview given in the Pall Mall Gazette also appeared in the Eastbourne Chronicle, Saturday 15th July 1899, p.6.

 

 

GIAMBOLOGNA’S OCEANUS
A Sculptural Seduction
 
Your fixed stare over left shoulder;
The laurels in your curled hair…
Those marble veins straining for antiquity
(Veins only matched by Julien’s tender
Dying Gladiator, wounded and fallen, or
Simart’s Orestes at the Altar of Pallas);
There’s something feminine in your stance
As if you are chastened like a virginal maid
With your beautiful posterior ballooning,
Shaming Michaelangelo’s enigmatic David;
The sort of buttocks that could deftly crush
A battleship, drowning men beneath waves,
Lost at sea, sunk into oblivion… a fine rump
Say, equalled by Cleomenes’s Marcellus as
Hermes Logios in smooth marble, or perhaps
Cellini’s Perseus with the Head of Medusa…
 
Your biceps bring irresistible life to the dead,
Your salty seduction enflames passions which
Lie sleepless and alone …torso-dreaming…
Your muscled stature brings a sweet arousal;
Elevates me into nude affirmation, defines
Contour of limb… your strong face framed
By full beard, curling beneath straight nose
And almost frowning forehead; your eyes
Filled with un-distracted hocus pokus –
Seize me river god, and let me gently stroke
Your hurly burly hair, your firm neck strained
And slightly arched like diplodocus…
Have you seen the sleeping satyr in the Louvre
By Bouchardon? Such beauty in the world exists…
Hush, tread soft, or we may wake him!
 
Are you embarrassed by tiny genitals that nestles
Like an acorn in the undergrowth; the same
Unassuming nut that Prestinari gives to Hercules
And covers with an appropriate curled leaf?
Is that why you’re attempting to hide them
Behind a sea shell in your left hand? Not quite
The splendid thing we find in Hendrik
Anderson, or Guillaume Coustou –
His dreamy-eyed Ganymede proudly
Exposing his organ for the world to see!
The arousing figure of Jason by Thorvaldsen
Whose hairless vulnerability defines him!
Or Pajou’s Mercury, hiding his causality
Behind stubbornly immovable drapery,
The same shiftless stone we find in Canova’s
Sleeping Endymion – not even concentrated
Thought can lift it to reveal the sweet suggestion
Of pastoral temptation and the virile member;
Or tear those stems from Dantan’s Young Bather…
The intense beauty of the spout of religion…
The shadowy islets of your godly perfection-
To lie crushed in your arms would be a heavenly sin
That I would come back to again and again to
Swim in your salty reaches and foamy sea…
To lie in your waters, devoured by Titan strength…
 
Beneath your right foot a monstrous fish creature,
Its tail extended upwards towards your thighs and
Resting at the entrance of your exquisitely pert rear;
Thighs longing to be held by robust, soldierly hands
And caressed by sea salt and saliva, thighs like the
Elegant form of the Borghese Ares in the Louvre,
Perhaps an unconventional lover… wild nobility,
Not the cultured and cerebral elegance we see in
Donatello’s David or Cellini’s Narcissus; we find the
Dominating muscle of Tegner’s Hercules and Danti’s
Truth Conquering Falsehood… how sweet that reminds me
Of a certain perfect piece by Bates, his Pandora, (not
To mention Gilbert’s Icarus) simply dying to be loved…
The flavour of your form entices, like noble Adam
Or the sensuality of Albano’s Fallen Angels and
There is something overpowering in your erect
Immortality which fascinates and seduces…
 
And I dream I am awaiting your wet delivery,
I am hungry for your Titan lust like hard marble
Touching the fragile perimeter of my smooth skin;
My soft, slippery servitude against your cold stone
Longing for the lip-curled kiss upon my sanctuary…
Inhaling the ocean upon your beard – a finger in me
Like seaweed winding the force of you to me –
My elbow at the crook of your knee… the bulk
Of your weight restraining and encapsulating
My restlessness at your shoulder and posterior
Plumpness, resolved by the shape of your most
Definable and exquisite buttocks that perfectly
Fit my hands, cupped upon them and eager…
If I listen carefully I hear the sound of the sea!
 
But my slender lips to yours distinctly reminds me
That there’s a certain funerary angel by Monteverde,
Whose wings caress her shapely form seductively and
Whose gaze and tapered fingers… but I digress –
You may not have the lithe and youthful limbs of
Hermes Ludovisi by Phidias or the boyish charm of
Eros stringing his bow or the statuesque lines of
Doryphoros by Polykleitos; or even the well-worn
Torso of the Strangford Apollo… but I love thee…
 I am enamoured of thy strong fathomless features
And the stone enchantment thou hast wrought in me;
The stolen kisses of reachable limb and forefinger
That for now I must accept as a great force within.
 
Miranda Fletcher.

 

CHANSONS DU PHALLUS
By
Meredith Malkarth.
 
In meditations of the heart, I sing
The sonorous raptures of the Phalle.
 
I.
 
How beautiful the penis
Of every shape and size;
A pleasure to all men is
A joy to little boys!
 
How beautiful the penis
That swells with sweet surprise
In the dance of lust between us;
In this ceremony of our thighs!
 
How beautiful the penis
That softly sings and sighs
Where its troubled world has seen us
Praise its fall and rise!
 
How beautiful the penis
That weeps in godly guise
Into the wound within us
That will not compromise.
 
How beautiful the penis
Of perfect precision and poise
Whose contours satisfies this
Phallic world of joys!
 
How beautiful the penis
That soft between us cries
In kissed caress of nakedness
Which gently glorifies
 
How beautiful the penis
Of every shape and size!
 
II
 
Its firm pulse rejoicing spits
Love in tender starts and fits
To flow with ecstasy and spill
The warm duration of my will
Into the soft folds of your skin;
 
So sweetly weeps this our pain
That floods the heart chambers now
To envelop understanding and grow
Into simple words of subtle lust:
Bind me softly in thy web of trust…
 
Sing those sad ballads of the heart
Where gently loves’ doubts depart
To fall as one flesh linked by love
As minds in comparison that rove
Over the blunt instrument of desire
 
And our demise too soon to expire
In the dread of wretched reality again
Where a firm pulse will rise and begin
Its dance of seduction and satisfaction
To spurt almost forgotten punctuation,
 
Raw and needful in its intensity that gives
All our emotions their most natural drives;
All our aspirations their insightful ways
As this basic of animal instinct displays
Condemned to an eternity of returning joy!
 
III.
 
What is this love but a thing of beauty
That moves momentous through a past
That’s twined about the heart and bolted;
Firm by form enriched by moonlight, it
 
Is the secret bow of the hunter that’s bent
Upon capture; sword of Achilles that is
Steel of stature in its wild yielding rapture;
Shudders in soft light, expels love and death
The sanctified oil of mans’ solar seduction.
 
Weeping in twilight idylls of misery,
See its smooth sadness fall before
Shafts of sunlight penetrate the room
As if sighing to some unheard thunder
That foretells strength lost… and doom!
 
Elegant, at the thigh’s surrender, swells
And swirls like sacred potion, love’s concoction
That forms my foam in sweet submission;
To feather my fibres into dreams is my
Sensual pleasure and consolation!
 
IV.
 
This thing of flesh and song, wearied
By the throb of love’s aftermath, soft
As silk yet as hard steel, strong, must,
Like the Blarney Stone, be kissed, to
Receive a gift; it must be worshipped
By caressing lips and enter the mouth
Like a dream before leaving as a prayer
And head bowed in act of receiving…
This, the holy adoration of God!
After its rippled devotion, its song of
Perpetual motion, a crescendo of rapture
Is released by animalistic grunt of affection!
And clasped between hands in supplication,
Its divine ecstasy and desire, its holy lineage
Is like a bookmark between pages of faith
And awful hours of inward longing;
Yet why is it so infused with sin? Why
Is it condemned above all things as the
Perpetrator of every obscene crime;
This flesh, muscle that gives relief;
Instigator of every foul and lurid act;
Dispenser of damnation and debauchery
And unwanted children; with incestuous lust
It is behind every indecent thought and
Wet dream satisfaction; every violation
And obscenity uttered; every desecration
Of decency and blister of disease: Master
Of fools and commander of Kings; Devil
Or Antichrist, for now, beneath a wave
Of emotion, sublime and sensuous, tender,
Innocent of all things, in appearance, naive,
And full of satisfaction after its sweet release,
Now repose, delightful, almost childlike as
After play, cools from its running, beauty now
Silent as the sweet spirit manifests, sleeping
And all is forgiven this thing of flesh and song.
 
V.
 
This, my muscle, my daemon that gives
Faith and identity and by instinct a promise
Of ecstasy, as in how I notice legs which fuel
My muse; legs of inordinate beauty, arouse
The self-like scimitar of my pleasure,
 
Pushed and pressed towards thought’s perimeter,
Shape ingrained as some antique memory, torn
From childhood perhaps or lingerie catalogue
That remained imp-like in the heart and silent as
We only ever talked about the weather.
 
And with wind arose the subjective, this lonely
Process of the damned towards the individual,
This raw idealism, unflinching and pathetic, this
‘Ted Hughs talked about like Tennyson’, devoid of
Earthy pagan, like empty barrow sacked of treasure.
 
The torment and tribulation of love, this love…
Elegant as a girl’s thighs, sings sweet and caresses,
And adorable, it is a language understood by all for
Out of all this confusion the body and endless mind
Breathes its maddening air… Still, together,
 
This is no Galilean tragedy, no delicate diversion of
The soul where we reach some measure of moonlight
Shed upon our bodies, absolute. This permeability of future
Remains and tells its own story of regret and anguish
But always beautiful and always seemingly pure!
 
VI.
 
This instrument of gentle sighing
That clambers over apologies and regret
To fall at the form of the sensual, relying
On the fire of an insubstantial brain, yet
 
Moves to the immediate distillation of love
And surrenders to caresses in shadows that will
Align its sweet contour to darkness, and rove
Through nocturnal blossom where love is still
 
Bound by the intricacies of human form and
Stirs before pleasure decides its complex drift;
Determined nature – the delight shaped by hand
Introduced to simple measure and its stride; shift
 
Hyacinthine-like into other worlds; weirdly wake
The emerging phallic desire that in infancy, found
Response, exasperated in thought transferred; make
An elixir of neural madness by which we are drowned;
 
An impurity of thought that often times can detect
An apology of guilt to beguile the body’s appetite
That curves to pleasures which are swift to resurrect
The rainbow tones of love that gives delight.

 

 

UPON A VISION OF BEAUTY:
OUR EYES COULD NOT MEET
 
She sang to the heavens with such glee
In the ancient Cathedral at evensong;
Such a perfect vision of earthly beauty
Soared with my heart uplifted and strong
As I stood to stare for an eternity
Upon fair form and features long
And her gaze and gestures were so sweet –
Yet this vision of beauty did not notice me
And our eyes could not meet.
 
I watched her sweet lips in their harmony
As she shone like a star in dull firmament
Transcending those who had gathered to see
And partake of the blessing and the sacrament.
And the flutter of her eyelash intensity
Showed a soul so alive and content
And so perfectly and beautifully complete –
Yet this vision of beauty did not notice me
And our eyes could not meet.
 
A wingless angel in my presence, was she
While I watched her attend to devotions;
My heart soared to heights most sensually
As I watched every small move of her motions
And yearned to embrace her… but sadly we
Were strangers drawn by separate emotions
And I felt my pained urgency in retreat –
Yet this vision of beauty did not notice me
And our eyes could not meet.
 
And the cruelty of that day in September
Shall haunt me for ever, I fear,
As I look upon your fair face and remember
How such a beautiful vision was near
And fired my heart from love’s ember
Which I hold in my breast ever dear
And enflame with my every heart beat –
Yet this vision of beauty did not notice me
And our eyes could not meet.
 
Barry Van-Asten. Christ Church Cathedral, Oxford.

 

 

 

BALLADE OF GREEK LOVE –
AFTER CROWLEY
(with a slight variation in the form)
 
My master loves me in the Greek 
And on this rule he will not sway; 
He teaches me six days a week 
In theory and in practice, play 
Throughout the night and through the day 
He’s such a happy man in this, 
But on the seventh he will not speak, 
Instead we practice how to kiss 
In French and English and in Greek!
 
My master loves me in the Greek
And moulds me firm as if with clay 
A vase he spins in the antique 
And paints me in bright colours, gay
Vibrant where soft fingers stray 
On folds of splendid Trojan bliss; 
On Greek antiquity now nouveau chic; 
He shaped me as sweet Artemis
Whom through the woods didst joyful seek.
 
My master loves me in the Greek 
And though his hair is lined with grey 
His features make my knees go weak 
When he holds me close to say 
Thou art my true love, let me lay 
Beside thee and neither turn amiss 
Thy sweetness, for thy sorrows bleak 
Are tortures of my own – I miss 
The rapture of thy body, sleek… 
 
ENVOI
 
My master loves me in the Greek, 
And in love I know no other way 
To find fortune in sweet kisses, meek 
I stand before him and always pray 
My master loves me in the Greek.
 
Barry Van-Asten

 

 THE SILVER CIGARETTE CASE
BY
BARRY VAN-ASTEN
 
 
 
 
Mr Thomas Fairfax, a man of slight wealth and much leisure, called upon Mr Esdmonde De John at his rooms in Eaton Square, Belgravia and finding the latter at home and busy in his drawing room which was sometimes called the library and sometimes called the study, seated amongst a few Christmas decorations, he took the opportunity of wishing Esmonde a merry Christmas. Esmonde in turn sighed and slumped further into his chair.
Thomas was a tall, dark-haired young man with an air of affected aristocracy who wandered through life with little purpose or regret, ‘you know Esmonde’ said Thomas,  ‘there’s a name for people like you, rarely used in polite society and frowned upon amongst the lower classes – a humbug!’ and Thomas drew closer to his friend.
‘Don’t mock me Thomas for I am in yuletide disarray!’ Esmonde said, his eyes looking up and directed at Thomas, filled with some perceivable heartache. Esmonde, a gentleman of similar wealth and appearance stood a little taller that Thomas and had about him an air of tragedy, a sort of melancholy that pervaded his persona.
‘Esmonde, dear boy, you look as if you have the weight of the world on your shoulders; what is the matter?’ Thomas asked quite affectionately, putting a hand on Esmonde’s shoulder as if to feel the weight of the world for himself. Esmonde looked up into Thomas’ eyes like a small boy full of dejection, ‘Aunt Augusta has sent a letter to inform me that she will be joining me for Christmas after all as the Vicar has had an unfortunate accident in the bell tower and shall be spending Christmas, and no doubt several weeks, disposed in the infirmary!’
‘No doubt it shall do him the world of good Esmonde to be amongst his parishioners in suffering! A pity he could not join them in abject poverty or at least meet them half-way, that would teach him something real and useful!’ Thomas laughed.
‘Yes but now I am condemned to suffer under the auspicious gaze of Aunt Augusta who does not appreciate my bachelor ways.’
‘My dear Esmonde even I do not appreciate your bachelor ways and I am quite broad-minded! I think in some respect even you fail to fully appreciate them and put them to good use! Perhaps it is time you entered the sanctity of marriage?’ and Thomas peered upon the condemned man with loyal tenderness.
‘Good God Thomas, you sound like a missionary!’ Esmonde said with a look of shock upon his face that could give ecclesiastical circles a run for its money! ‘Besides’, he continued, ‘I have it on good authority that the state of matrimony is doing very well without my interference and it would completely upset my soft furnishings!’
‘Ah, the fairer sex does have a tendency for upsetting a gentleman’s orderly conduct and haberdashery!’ uttered Thomas, ‘and children of course have that propensity to destroy a man’s sanity with the charitable thought that fatherhood is the apex of manhood and the paternal instinct the very meaning of existence; as if it is our sole purpose and duty to leave the next generation in a better condition than the one that abandons it!’
‘I have little regard for the next generation, the previous or the present for that matter and even less regard for the molluscs that crawl across the surface of the earth and have no wish to add to its population!’ Esmonde said, grasping the spirit of Christmas as if it were a thorny rose.
‘Why you sentimental old fool, you do have a heart after all!’ Thomas said with a look of tenderness in his eyes which can only be established through years of friendship. Thomas continued, saying ‘far be it for me to speak ill of the dead Esmonde but surely you can put up with the old girl for one day, it is Christmas after all?’
‘Christmas be damned! She has requested to stay the night as her daughter Francesca who would usually wait upon her in festive drudgery is attending a Christmas Ball at the parents of the man she intends to marry, a nice fellow, but rather dull! I can see it now - the carols will resound throughout the household like an introit for the dead! The dinner bell shall toll like a death knell and there will be a slow march to the awaiting grave that is breakfast in the clear light of day! My epitaph shall read “here lies the mortal remains of Esmonde De John, confirmed bachelor, who succumbed to the devastating and destructive influence of old age”.’
Thomas chuckled, ‘and I shall produce a marvellous eulogy, at no cost. The cemetery is filled with similar good intentions I believe.’
‘And the church is filled with wickedness,’ retorted Esmonde, ‘but nothing so wicked as having to sit opposite Aunt Augusta for Christmas dinner; her teeth rise like half-submerged derelicts from the exposed sands littered with the wrecks and prison hulks of yesteryear and her lips cover them like the shifting dunes of time! They died an awfully long time ago, when Victoria took the throne I am told!’
‘Then it’s high time she joined them! I have not had the pleasure of her company myself but I have it on good authority, actually Reverend Baldwin, that she has a fine complexion, not unlike cheese. Take comfort Esmonde that she will depart from this world at some point in the not too distant future one hopes and leave her spoils to her favourite Nephew, no doubt!’
‘Yes, and probably on the condition that I produce a family to order!’ and Esmonde winced.
‘Tricky! Thankfully I do not believe in miracles. Have you ever really been in love Esmonde, I mean all that surrendering of the spirit and two hearts as one sort of tosh? I hear it does wonders for the soul and for filling tedious idle hours which would otherwise be spent in fascinating manly pursuits.’
‘I was in love once, Thomas’, Esmonde confessed as if it were some sinful crime, ‘it was during the bloom of my youth and she was the most stunning creature that ever dreamed by night and walked by day, or perhaps I should say dreamed by day and walked by night as she was of a nocturnal beauty; her mind was piercingly fierce of intellect and her eyes were of a vaporous moonlight, the pure feminine, a goddess in stature who stood between worlds, that of the living and that of the dead; the most exceptional woman I ever met and ever will meet!’
‘And you let her go?’ Thomas said abruptly.
‘It was an inevitable catastrophe! She haunts my every thought and lingers in my dreams. I pour my love upon her from afar as if she were an altar of devotion and shall do till my dying breath on earth. I was a fool, an absolute fool to my shame!’ Esmonde bowed his head as if seemingly before that altar of his desire.
‘Well there is no use dwelling on the past old boy and what could have been; “might have beens” won’t cut any ice with Aunt Augusta you know!’ Thomas said in an attempt at sympathy. Esmonde looked off into the distance remembering things as they were between him and his lost love or inventing them in a new light of imagination and some moments elapsed until the silence was broken by Simpkins, Esmonde’s valet and general manservant entering the drawing room.
‘Excuse me sir, but I have taken the liberty of unpacking a case of sherry as your Aunt is so fond of it! Oh and I have disposed of that matter to which we are not supposed to talk about sir.’
‘I’m sure I don’t know to what you are referring to Simpkins but thank you anyway. That will be all for tonight, and merry Christmas to you!’
‘Yes merry Christmas!’ echoed Thomas, adding, ‘I say, he’s the very Sphinx isn’t he?’
‘I couldn’t do without him!’ whispered Esmonde, ‘he sweeps all my desires under the carpet until there is no trace of them! Everyone should have a Simpkins!’
Simpkins, a long-necked, reliable man in his forties left the room in his easy and distinctive manner; usually his head would enter a room peering round the door and the rest of him would appear several seconds later. He was a confident man not averse to covering certain misdemeanours of his master and employer, Mr. Esmonde De John; a man in receipt of much trust and favour in pasting over the socially embarrassing cracks that appear from time to time following his master’s excursions into unknown pastures of London.
Esmonde took his cigarette case from his pocket and offered it to Thomas, who took one and smiled, and then Thomas said, looking at the cigarette case: ‘I see you are still loath to part with this little treasure! See how close he clutches the abomination!’ Thomas mocked as Esmonde rolled the sparkling cigarette case in his hands.
‘There are so few cigarette cases in the hands of the recipients as most were pawned for hard cash Thomas and besides, it was a gift from Oscar to me and it has become a symbol of friendship – I could never part with it!’
‘Friendship indeed! You met him once or twice and consider yourself a life-long comrade of the condemned man!’ Thomas said as if scolding his friend.
‘Thomas you sound like a common shop girl! You know you are much mistaken and you are much like Oscar when you speak so ill of me for he was an inveterate snob also and I told him so, in jest of course, to his utter amusement.’
‘I know you did, it’s been trotted round every dinner and luncheon table ever since!’
‘You seem to doubt me Thomas.’ Esmonde said, hiding his upset.
‘On the contrary old boy I know the truth of the matter and have refrained from referring to it in society. Please do me the honour and haul it out once again just for me won’t you!’ Thomas put his hand on Esmonde’s hand with the touch of firm friendship.
‘You are rude Thomas and I shall do no such thing!’ Esmonde looked decidedly hurt by the remark.
‘I am sorry Esmonde, really I am, it’s just my way, I could never do anything to hurt you really. Please do relate the story once more.’ Pure love blazoned from Thomas’ eyes upon his friend, a love unspoken and eternal.
‘Oh very well, as you asked me so nicely. Well, I said he was an inveterate snob and Wilde, grasping at his jowls, thanked me and said he was much flattered by the observation and that the world revolves on flattery and coins of the realm and that he was rich in one and poor in the other!’
Thomas yawned; ‘I bet he never mentioned those stained sheets of the Savoy and that horrid chamber-maid; it will no doubt haunt him for the rest of his days – they were his undoing you know!’ Thomas chuckled.
‘Thomas, how could you be so heartless?’ Esmonde was decidedly perturbed.
‘Heartless nothing old chap! And fancy making that remark about the ugly boy, what was his name?’ Thomas rubbed his fingers together as if searching through an imaginary directory of ugly boys.
‘Walter Grainger.’ Answered Esmonde triumphantly.
 ‘Yes, that’s it, and not kissing him due to his peculiar ugliness! What a fool! It sealed his fate of course!’
‘Rot and you know it!’
‘Perhaps, was that the only time you met Wilde?’ Thomas enquired.
‘I’d rather not say.’ And Esmonde changed the subject. ‘Tell me Thomas, how is that book of yours coming along? Is it as indecent as its author pretends to be?’
‘Motets and Moon-Threads? Not so well but it’s to be expected; one cannot thrust a volume of poetry upon an unsuspecting public and expect a fair trial. The critic you know says what is on his mind and the artist says what is in his heart but the general public replies with what is in their bank accounts.’
‘There is a distinct lack in humanity to appreciate good poetry these days. When I am called to answer for my foibles Thomas I shall take Saint Peter aside and have the failing corrected!’
‘I have always suspected you of having fraudulent connections in the next world!’
‘You shouldn’t treat the matter so lightly you know Thomas, there are more things in heaven and hell… tell me, what is your opinion of death?’
‘Like honouring one’s debts it is to be avoided at all costs! You do surprise me Esmonde, for if I want a lecture upon immorality and spiritual affairs I go to my barber and if I want advice on all the riches heaven supposedly has in store for me I go to my tailor; likewise a sermon on the wickedness of fornication and the sins of the flesh is dispensed by my butcher – for business and financial management and salacious gossip I go to the Church!’
‘Then we are of a similar mind for I always go to my dentist for the dangers of democracy and political affairs of state to which he is privy! But seriously Thomas, what are your views on death?’ Esmonde gazed into Thomas’ eyes searchingly.
‘We exist and then we die, that is all, it is a bitter-sweet tragedy I know but there is no evidence to the contrary. Why are you so morbid this evening Esmonde?’
‘These dark nights of winter turn my mind to mortality and other dark thoughts I am afraid. I fear I am condemned to the obscurity of the grave; I have made no singular difference to the life of another living soul – I have been and ever shall be an unsatisfied and un-manifested afterthought and my life is not worth the skin I inhabit!’
Thomas put his hand on Esmonde’s shoulder, saying ‘such tragedy in twenty-seven years of existence! These thoughts are not peculiar to you alone you know, the essence of humanity is bathed in darkness.’
‘I can only speak for myself Thomas’, Esmonde said with a look of dejection on his face, ‘I am tired of the artificial and want something real to have and hold! I produce no sensation and provoke no emotion – I am already dead!’
Silence ensued and Thomas put his hand to Esmonde’s head and softly stroked his hair which seemed to pull Esmonde a little from his despair.
‘Aunt Augusta believes in spiritualism’, Esmonde said like a child, ‘you know all that table-rapping stuff and conversing with long dead entities such as Drake and Cromwell!’
‘If it were possible then why do we not hear from the likes of Judas, a much maligned man if I may say so, and Caligula and Genghis Khan? No doubt it shall come as some surprise to her when she looks death square in the teeth to find no celestial plane on which to play bridge or stand eye-ball to eye-ball with the great and the good! Have you ever seen a ghost Esmonde, you talk as if you are half converted yourself?’
‘I have a yearning towards such things but to say I have seen a ghost would be a lie, yet I might add, that the apparition of Aunt Augusta rising in the night like a spectre from the grave might have a similar effect upon the living!’
‘How perfectly frightful! You know Esmonde, I never could understand why you adore Christmas so much, or at least pretend to, you a complete pagan, and deplore New Year! Will you be attending mass this year?’
‘I would not miss it for the world! Those delightful choristers brighten up anyone’s Christmas mood especially after the Reverend  keeps insisting on mentioning some fellow named Jesus which completely spoils the atmosphere of Christmas!’ Esmonde sneered.
‘I quite agree’ said Thomas, ‘there is much too much importance placed on this Jesus chap, I mean, what did he ever do in the name of Christmas? It’s not like he invented the bloomin’ thing! Did he distribute presents to the children who slept soundly in their beds at night while Lord and Lady Dillweather-something-or-other hurried the servants along – no he did not! It seems to me all he did do was to stop people having damned fun; look at what he did in the market place for God’s sake, completely ruined everyone’s day – what a dullard, a real dowdy sort of fellow and not someone you’d care to rub shoulders with. He must have been thoroughly dead to every sensation, except suffering, he was very good at that so we are told constantly, but did he ever have one, just one strong and sensuous emotion or express beauty in the form of flesh upon flesh? These are the high sensations of life Esmonde. But I forget, I’m preaching to the converted.’
‘You are a born philosopher Thomas and a barbarian to boot! If I were born with your immeasurable kindness I should think I could accomplish wonders, but as I was not I do not and therefore waste away in utter obscurity; please say you will stay for dinner.’
‘Ah and be a witness to the ritual slaughter of Christmas by Aunt Augusta! When is she supposed to arrive: the witching hour?’
‘At eight and she is always punctual! Please say you will stay Thomas and protect me from her infernal questioning. I shall be an absolute wreck before New Year hammers the final nail in the coffin. You haven’t made other arrangements have you?’
‘That depends on what gastronomic delight you have prepared.’
‘Lobster!’ Esmonde said as if it were some sacred word of the Ancient Order of Gentlemanly Layabouts, uttered in darkness before an altar of depravity.
‘What a thoroughly wicked life you lead!’ Thomas squealed, knitting his brows together at the thought of lobster, ‘speaking of lobster, how is your sister Clarissa?’
‘I do not know why you should force lobster and my sister Clarissa into the same sentence as if it were a cooking pot; you know perfectly well she is engaged to be married.’
‘Is that still going ahead? I thought it had all fallen through.’
‘And why shouldn’t it? My sister is perfectly respectable and will make an excellent wife to Rector Spotiswode.’
‘I have frequently found that country Rector’s wives have all the erotic allure of an old Saint and the patience of a tuppeny strumpet!’
‘Thankfully I have never been so rash or so extravagant as to spend so much as “tuppeny” on a strumpet, patient or otherwise and never will and your attempt at humour is as disagreeable as a cold shower on a wet weekend in Hastings. Well, shall I set another place for dinner? It will be no trouble.’ Esmonde pleaded with his friend.
‘Very well old boy, I shall stay in the name of friendship and in the line of duty to defend the good name of De John!’
‘You are a marvel Thomas!’
‘So I am frequently told. You know, I cannot say myself that I have experienced love; all that passion sort of thing, it seems to me that lust is an ever-present condition and usually unsatisfied. I tend to believe that madness is the outward manifestation of love. You know Esmonde, I have always had this strange affliction for nuns, all that restrained passion suppressed by the spiritual bindings of the church and the material barrier of the habit. To tap it and see that passion gush forth like oil upon water in every conceivable fleshly direction, splashing upon poor sinning me. No doubt it shall all come out in my autobiography – Touched by Raven and Rook!’
‘You’re speaking like a common Bishop! Pull yourself together old boy and if ever such an autobiography were to appear it would be avoided like the plague!’ Just then a bell rang.
‘Talking of the plague!’ Esmonde turned quite pale and said ‘into the lion’s den!’
‘Remember Androcles!’ Thomas said defiantly.
‘He didn’t have to contend with Aunt Augusta!’ Esmonde went into the hallway to receive his Aunt.
‘Good gracious Esmonde! Have you sunk so low that you must open your own front door?’ Chimed Aunt Augusta.
‘And merry Christmas to you too Aunt Augusta!’ Esmonde bellowed, stifling his laughter before continuing, ‘I have given Simpkins the night off, it is Christmas Day after all!’
‘Yes, yes’ waved Aunt Augusta. ‘You know Esmonde, I have always noticed in you a nasty streak of lavish generosity. Such liberties did not occur in my day!’
Aunt Augusta entered handing her coat, hat and gloves to Esmonde. ‘I suppose cook will be available or have you completely taken leave of your senses?’
‘Cook has prepared a most admirable dinner and I have sent her home to be with her family at Christmas.’
‘How very bohemian of you, I really don’t know where you get it from, it’s certainly not from your mother’s side. Are there any other wild Saturnalian surprises in store?’
‘Just one and he is waiting for us in the drawing room.’
Esmonde ushered in Aunt Augusta whose stern face seemed to whither away the Christmas cheer at an alarming pace and replace it with Christmas misery.
‘And who is this, the parlour maid I daresay?’ said Aunt Augusta under her breath before intoning, ‘Esmonde, who is your charming friend?’ and Aunt Augusta stretched out an arm in the general direction of Thomas.
‘Aunt Augusta may I introduce my dear friend Mr. Thomas Cyril Fairfax!’
‘Pleased to meet you Mr. Fairfax; and what is your profession?’
‘I am a poet Madam! Therefore I have no profession!’
‘Ah, an honest sloth, how delightful.’
‘May I get you a sherry Aunt?’ asked Esmonde.
‘Esmonde, you know I deplore strong drink! But one must be festive I suppose, perhaps a small one.’ Esmonde handed Aunt Augusta a glass of sherry which was very far from small and very near to full and they all sat by the fire.
Aunt Augusta noticed a book on the fireside table and picked it up and turned it around in her hands, ‘Pride and Prejudice. Esmonde, have you been reading this?’
‘Yes, it’s really rather good Aunt.’
‘Hmm, a lady may write novels, it is a harmless occupation, but it is most unbecoming of a gentleman to read them! I find it quite deplorable that a lady should reveal a woman’s intimate and genteel shortcomings which would otherwise remain one of life’s great mysteries!’ Aunt Augusta sniffed and dropped the novel as if it were contagious.
‘Esmonde tells me Madam’, Thomas said in an effort to change the subject, ‘that you are interested in spiritualism, how fascinating!’
‘Yes, do you know that I am on the most intimate and friendliest of terms with most of the deceased Kings of England? They are really quite charming, except for Henry VIII, he’s quite a bully you know! When my time comes and I am called to the veil it is more than likely that I shall be returning like Marley’s ghost to rattle my chains and haunt the family who think I am slightly mad you know?’
‘Well as you shall be in the business of haunting I must give you the name and address of my tax collector!’ chuckled Esmonde; Aunt Augusta ignored the remark.
‘Tell me Mr. Fairfax, are your parents still with us or are they in the afterlife?’ Aunt Augusta stared inquisitively into Thomas’ eyes.
‘Gladly still with us Madam on the side of the living but sadly not here with us. I am of Hampshire stock Madam and my father is in the business of agriculture.’
‘He means he’s a farmer’s son Aunt Augusta.’ That distinguished old lady turned her nose up and shrivelled intensely at the thought.
‘Nothing of the sort Esmonde, father is an exporter of agricultural implements and is highly respected in that field and made a sizable fortune from it!’
‘Farmers and their fields!’ sighed Aunt Augusta, ‘shall you be returning to that delightful county for New Year Mr. Fairfax or have you completely lost all sense of proportion and accustomed yourself, like Esmonde, to London society?’
‘I am a simple man of nature at heart Madam and therefore have become fully acclimatised to the whirl of London life which I so enjoy and shall not be indulging New Year in Hampshire or any other county for that matter. Speaking of New Year, Esmonde quite abhors New Year.’ Thomas looked at Esmonde with unfaltering love.
Yes, and do you know why Mr. Fairfax?’ Aunt Augusta squeaked, looking down her nose.
‘Don’t believe a word of it Thomas!’ said Esmonde handing Aunt Augusta another sherry with a look of absolute fear on his face as if he were to be exposed of a crime.
‘Because’ continued Aunt Augusta in a tone of reverence, ‘he was found doing something quite unspeakable one New Year’s Eve with the house-boy!’
‘That’s a lie Aunt Augusta and you know it!’ Esmonde said defiantly.
‘I had it from the lips of your own dear mother Esmonde and I would hardly disbelieve my own sister now would I?’ There was a silence as Thomas looked at Esmonde and Esmonde glanced at Aunt Augusta who in turn was staring at Thomas. Esmonde nervously took his cigarette case from his pocket and put a cigarette to his lips.
‘Esmonde must you, you know I detest smoking and do not approve of it!’ declared Aunt Augusta, ‘you would not’ she continued, ‘do such a thing in church.’
‘That depends Madam’ said Thomas, ‘in theory – yes, in practice – no.’
‘Are you a church now Aunt Augusta?’ Esmonde asked sarcastically.
‘Don’t be impertinent!’ said that austere old lady taking another sherry for herself, ‘you may have acquired a smoky reputation which invariably occurs from some nefarious point of ignition but there is no need to fan the flames further by smoking!’
Esmonde glanced at Aunt Augusta and a chill surged through him as his attention was drawn to her atrocious teeth which rose like broken battlements in that valley of death which was her mouth; he returned the cigarette to the case, ‘and besides, continued Aunt Augusta, ‘that case has beastly attachments!’
‘It has nothing of the sort. It was given to me by a very dear friend, an artist; one might even go so far as to say a genius.’
‘That may be so but must he suffer for his art so literally and so publicly and offend society by so doing?’
‘Society can go hang!’ Esmonde said under his breath. Thomas chuckled.
‘You said something Esmonde?’
‘Merely that Society is everything! Thomas, you were telling me something of your interest in the church before Aunt Augusta arrived and how you admire those dutiful and poor sisters who work so tirelessly in their devotion.’
‘You are quite exceeding the realms of friendship dear Esmonde to speak of such personal spiritual aspirations which I spoke of in strictest confidence.’ Thomas handed Aunt Augusta another sherry.
‘You are quite right Mr Fairfax it is most unbecoming of Esmonde to bring the matter up. Are you married Mr Fairfax?’ Aunt Augusta asked.
‘Sadly no madam, I have not had the good fortune to find love.’
‘Good gracious! One does not marry for love Mr Fairfax; one marries for position and social standing. I absolutely detested my first husband Major Barclay, we never saw eye to eye on anything. He was stationed in India you know, until he had a touch of sunstroke and went queer, putting several natives in the family way before running off into the bush to do the only decent and honourable thing he ever did in his entire life: he put his revolver to his head and shot himself! Now my second husband, ah, Mr Wade, a good, kind man, poor Stephen… it was a most unfortunate accident, he bent down to tie his shoelace in Sloan Square and was kicked in the head by a horse, the cab man was most apologetic!’
‘Do they ever contact you, from the other side I mean?’ asked Thomas.
‘Good heavens no! The Major was never one to speak much in life, certainly not to me so I don’t see why he should suddenly become a chatterbox in death! Although I did hear from Stephen once, he told me that he didn’t mind me marrying again but I am hardly likely to try a third time! I find I am suited to widowhood, it has really made me!’
‘I must say you don’t paint an awfully pretty picture of marriage.’ Said Thomas with a smile, handing her another sherry, ‘if only I were twenty years younger Mr Fairfax I should attend to your peculiarities a little more carefully,’ Aunt Augusta said, smiling to reveal the sunken wrecks. ‘Forty years younger would not be stretching the imagination too far!’ Thomas thought to himself but politely said ‘Your Aunt Augusta Esmonde is a lady of impeccable taste and refinement!’
‘My dear Mr Fairfax, how very perceptive of you,’ returned Aunt Augusta, and so the conversation drifted into this and that corner of half-hearted attempts at prolonging humour and interest but in the face of such adversity as Aunt Augusta the barrage became a minor tirade of boredom and displeasure which eked itself out through dinner.
Aunt Augusta was decidedly unimpressed with the lobster but held her tongue on the matter and following two more glasses of sweet sherry she retired to her bed chamber for the night. Esmonde and Thomas sat up a while enjoying their brandy and cigarettes now that the old dispenser of gloom and disapproval had extinguished her eyes and found the world of sleep full of new opportunities for misery making.
‘I’m not sure I like the idea of your making love to My Aunt Augusta, Thomas, it is most distressing and thoroughly obscene.’
Thomas agreed to stay the night also as it was late and carriages would be difficult to be had and he was as much averse to walking as he was hard work, so he took up space on a sofa and made himself comfortable before falling into a chain of nightmares all of which featured the terrible sight of Aunt Augusta’s teeth.
The next morning, having woken quite late, Esmonde knocked on Aunt Augusta’s door to inform her that breakfast would be prepared shortly. Receiving no answer Esmonde slowly and cautiously entered the room and to his utter astonishment there was no sight or sound of Aunt Augusta; in fact, her bed had not been slept in. He scanned the room and worked by a process of elimination and made a search for her handbag for Aunt Augusta was rarely far away from her handbag and failing that he looked for her gown and then in turn looked for her gloves, hat and coat which were nowhere to be found and neither was the small and imperfectly formed body of Aunt Augusta or the rotten, broken tusks that rose from her gums and passed for teeth; in fact, she was nowhere to be seen in the house! Esmonde woke Thomas and told him his concerns and that Aunt Augusta was not there and seemed as if she were never there at all. Where could she be? Was she spirited away in the night? They both made a thorough search upstairs and downstairs and not a thread of her was to be found. It was as if she had never been there and further, not existed at all!
Esmonde discovered his cigarette case was missing – ‘I’ve been burgled Thomas’. A search for the item turned up nothing and the mystery deepened.
Thomas had to leave as he had already made arrangements that afternoon but he promised to return later that evening to comfort Esmonde who was beside himself with worry for his Aunt, and of course for the whereabouts of his cigarette case.
 It was towards the evening that a letter arrived from his cousin, Miss Wade who informed him that on her return from the country she found that her mother, Esmonde’s Aunt Augusta, had sadly died sometime around six p.m. the previous day, Christmas Day. But how could that have been when shortly after this time she arrived at the home of Esmonde in Eaton Square, and attended dinner and stayed the night? Miss Wade went on to say in the letter that Esmonde’s cigarette case was found on her person when she died at home which she could not account for. Esmonde was dumbfounded. How could it be? When he told Thomas of the letter that distinguished young gentleman was equally perturbed and perplexed and they both thought that perhaps some occult disturbance had been at play and they both agreed to put it out of their minds and resigned themselves to never talk about it again. Esmonde did not even ask for the return of the silver cigarette case as it would now hold a most distressing significance. Whatever had indeed occurred on that fateful Christmas Day it had a lasting and profound effect upon the lives of Mr Esmonde De John and Mr Thomas Cyril Fairfax.

 



THE MAGICK BOOK WORM
REVIEWS BY BARRY VAN-ASTEN


Cambridge Poets, 1900-1913: An Anthology Chosen by Aelfrida Tillyard.

Published in 1913, this collection of over one-hundred and thirty poems (226) by thirty-eight contributors is dedicated to ‘the memory of Dr. Verrall; to Mrs. Verrall; and to all my Cambridge friends.’ The introduction by Arthur Quiller-Couch drags up Dryden and Boccaccio to explain the lyric form and the poetic impulse which is all standard fare before the delight of the poems from the likes of John Alford (King’s), Rupert Brooke (King’s) – ‘In Examination’, ‘Day that I have loved’, ‘Kindliness’ and of course ‘The Old Vicarage, Grantchester’. There are some unexpected examples such as ‘Autumn Thoughts’ by Richard Buxton (Trinity): ‘Long life lies before us, years of living together; / Reason is not enough. Kiss me, beloved, again.’ Of course that old devil Aleister Crowley (Trinity), whom I happen to consider quite a fine poet, is included with ten of his works: ‘In Neville’s Court, Trinity College, Cambridge’ beginning ‘I THINK the souls of many men are here / Among these cloisters, underneath the spire / That the moon silvers with magnetic fire;’ and goes on to say ‘O soul contemplative of distant things, who hast a poet’s heart.’ – ‘On Garret Hostel Bridge’, ‘The Goad’, ‘The Rosicrucian’, ‘Song’, ‘In Memoriam A. J. B.’, ‘The Challenge’, ‘Two Hymns on the Feast of the Nativity’, ‘The Palace of the World’ and ‘Perdurabo’. With Crowley of course comes fellow poet and magical assistant to the Great Beast, Victor B. Neuburg (Trinity): ‘Under Magdalen Bridge’ with its picturesque ‘lapping, lapping, lapping of the stream / Makes songs around my lazy-light canoe;’ and its ‘sleepy river ripples, ripples ever / Betwixt the old brown wall and meadow trim;’ – ‘The Creation of Eve’, ‘A Lost Spirit’, ‘A Music Picture’, ‘Seascape’ (unpublished), ‘Epilogue’ (To The Triumph of Pan), ‘Serpens Noctis Regina Mundi’ (unpublished. Invocation a la Lune. Ballade Argentee.) Also included are Gerald H. S. Pinsent (King’s), Harold Monro (Gonville and Caius), J. C. Squire (St John’s) and I was glad to see James Elroy Flecker’s (Gonville and Caius) wonderful poem ‘To a Poet a Thousand Years Hence’. There are fine works from women authors such as Amy K. Clarke (Newnham), Frances Cornford (nee Darwin), Margery Mines (Newnham) and Aelfrida Catherine Wetenhall Tillyard (Mrs. C. Graham) throws eleven of her unpublished poems into the poet – I can’t help wondering if a man had chosen the poems there would be less examples from women, probably.

 

Cambridge Poets, 1914-1920: An Anthology Compiled by Edward Davidson.

Published in 1920, this second Cambridge anthology has forty-seven contributors (216 pages) where we find six more poems from Rupert Brooke (King’s), J. C. Squire (St John’s), R. C. Trevelyan (Trinity), Harold Monro and James Elroy Flecker (both Gonville and Caius) and works from Frank H. Kendon (St John’s), S. Bellhouse (Emmanuel), J. R. Ackerley (Magdalene) and Siegfried Sassoon (Clare): ‘Morning Express’, ‘When I’m among a blaze of lights…’, ‘Villon’, ‘Before the Battle’, ‘How to Die’ and ‘Death’s Brotherhood’; but I think I was most impressed by C. Colleer Abbott (Gonville and Caius) whose two poems ‘Honeysuckle’ and ‘Berries’ resonated strongly with me –

 

Berries
 
Would that your lips desirable,
And elvish mood that with them plays,
Were necromancing here with me
Along the dark woodways.
 
The wild wood strawberries do swing
Where silence spills and moonlight drips,
Waiting their ghostly visitor
And her immortal lips.
 
They fold their jewelled fruit in leaves,
Reluctant to be mortal prize:
No matter for the woods wild things
And all its watching eyes,
 
I would find wild berries for you,
All through the wood, for your wild lips,
And I would gather them to feed
With wood love, those your lips.
 
And dip each crimson berry in
Moon’s silver light, as this and this
Do swing, and covenant for each
Wild strawberry, a kiss.

 

There are also some fine examples from women: Olwen W. Campbell, Fredegond Shove and Kathleen Montgomery Wallace (all Newnham College). Although the tragedy of war has permeated through most of these poems with some sense of the loss, the surrendered acceptance that the awful waste of life has not been in vain, there is a marked change in the lyrical form of the verse which is perceivable with every touch of rural devotion and spiritual evocation.

 

Sexuality, Magic and Perversion – by Francis King.

Published in 1971 (I read a 1974 paperback edition), Francis King, who certainly has a way with titles, completely redeems himself in my eyes after I forced myself to read his dreadful ‘Secret Rituals of the OTO’. In over two-hundred pages and three parts: ‘A Witch, a Pornographer and Oriental Sex Magic’, ‘The Occidental Background’ and ‘Sexuality and Magic in the Modern World’, King goes into great depth and is quite bold (chapter one is titled ‘A Dildo for a Witch’) in his investigations and in part one we find an enigmatic fellow by the name of Edward Sellon (1818-1866), a Captain in the army, a coach-driver, fencing-master and a pornographer, in fact he is ‘the man whose writings had first brought Tantricism to the attention of occidental occultists.’ (p. 9) Sellon published his influential ‘Annotations upon the Sacred Writings of the Hindus’ in 1865 and King quotes freely from his autobiography ‘The Ups and Downs of Life’ (1867) which has some fascinating points, but on the whole King says that ‘Sellon’s failure to arrive at any faint conception of the inner philosophy of Tantricism completely invalidated his interpretation of the cult.’ (p. 29) After a life of sexual indulgence and adventure Sellon shot himself and thus fades from history another forward-thinking man! And so King saunters through Buddhist and Hindu tantric practices and Chinese Sexual Alchemy (the Tao, Yin and Yang) before arriving at part two at ‘Primitive Fertility Cults’. Chapter six ‘The Great Mother Falls on Evil Days’ grabbed my attention as it speaks of ‘The Sacred Magic of Abra Melin the Mage’, something I am particularly fond of; ‘Malleus Maleficarum’ and the Devil in Witchcraft – the Blood Sacrifice; and with the door of darkness fully open we step inside the temple to find the next chapter discussing ‘Masses – Black, White and Amatory’ and meeting such gentle souls of debauchery as the Abbe Guilbourg and Madame de Montespan, before rising to the occasion with ‘Priapus Rediscovered’ and authors such as Richard Payne Knight and his ‘Essay on the Worship of Priapus’ (1786) and the sexual symbolism of Hargrave Jennings. Part three opens with ‘Templarism and Sex Magic’ which most occultists and ceremonial magicians will be familiar with – the Ordo Templi Orientis (OTO) with its alchemical symbolism which was founded by the German Karl Kellner; in 1905 when Kellner died Theodore Reuss assumed the Headship of the OTO, and so we reach the zenith of chapter ten – ‘Enter Baphomet’: The Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn and Aleister Crowley. King includes the ‘Supreme Ritual’ and mentions The Paris Working which Crowley undertook with Victor Neuburg (Crowley became Head of the OTO when Reuss died in 1922). Chapter eleven introduces us to sigils, Karl Germer and astrological sex magic – ‘Saturn-Gnosis, Sex Magic, and Planetary Aspects’ and chapter twelve brings some light relief with the curious ‘Bishop and the Boy’ and anyone who has studied Theosophy will no doubt be familiar with the identity of the ‘Bishop’ for it is none other than that old ex-Anglican curate and influential Theosophist, Charles Webster Leadbetter (1847-1934) who had some unsavoury ways with teaching young boys to masturbate. He was ordained as an Anglican priest in 1879 and had a curacy in Hampshire before meeting the seemingly mesmerising figure of Madame Blavatsky in 1885 and so the spell was woven. Leadbetter spent several years in India and Ceylon but had to resign from the Theosophical Society due to his masturbatory habits with boys and a subsequent trial, but the old devil was not down! After the death of the Theosophical big-wig, Colonel Olcott, Leadbetter saw his chance to once again grease his palms so to speak and climb his way back into favour with the Society (he was instrumental in the rise of Krishnamurti and all that old tosh) and so in 1909 he was back in and no doubt up to his old tricks. In 1913 he went to Australia, probably to escape more rumours and a possible scandal and safe down-under he was made a Bishop! But there is no evidence to suggest that Leadbetter was utilising dark, occult techniques – ‘however odd his sexual beliefs, whatever his relationships with some of his pupils may have been, he was not “a Black Magician using homosexual activities to create a reservoir of astral power” – there is not a shadow of proof for the allegations made by Dion Fortune and accepted unthinkingly by so many occultists’ (p. 141), no but it is an interesting concept nonetheless and wouldn’t he have made a charming dinner guest! Let us pass quickly through the next chapter – ‘Sexual Magic in the United States’ for it is all now too familiar: Charles S. Jones, Jack Parsons and Agape Lodge, Kenneth Anger, Pierre Bernard, Anton La Vey and the Church of Satan etc. and chapter fourteen: ‘Magicians, the Orgasm and the Works of Wilhelm Reich’ and fifteen, ‘A Whip for Aradia’ which takes a dip into Sado-Masochism, and sixteen, ‘The Future of Sexual Magic’ to arrive at the Appendices to which there are six: Appendix A – ‘The Dildo in History’ is an eye-wateringly frank, yet brief account of the penis-shaped pleasure aid through history – B ‘Robert Graves, Witches and Islamic Mysticism’ – C ‘Copulating with Cleopatra’ (the Prophet Vintras, Abbe Boullan and the Church of Carmel) – D ‘Another Sex Magic Ritual’, in fact, Crowley’s ‘Ritual to Invoke Hice [Isis] or any other Divine One’ – E ‘Ralph Chubb, Boy Love, and William Blake’, anyone who is enthusiastic about the uranians will come across the name of Ralph Chubb at some point and this is a fascinating glimpse into the world of Ralph Nicholas Chubb (1892-1960) who was born in Harpenden, Hertfordshire and moved to St. Albans. He won a scholarship to Selwyn College, Cambridge in 1910, was a great chess player and artist and attained his BA in 1913. He enlisted in the Army in 1914 (Loos 1915) and was mentioned in dispatches; as a Captain he was invalided out in 1918 and studied at the Slade School of Art; he built his own printing press with his brother in Berkshire and began printing his illuminated works in the manner of William Blake. Chubb is an absolutely fascinating though rather neglected figure in literature and his quasi-occult, erotic works are rare – ‘Manhood’ (1924), ‘The Sacrifice of Youth’ (1924), ‘Fable of Love and War’ (1925), ‘The Book of God’s Madness’ (1928), ‘Songs of Mankind’ (1930) and several more equally marvellous publications. King rounds the book off with Appendix F ‘Crowleyanity in Switzerland’ – yes it is one of those books that have attained cult-like status among a certain readership; yes it is cited frequently and listed in many distinguished books on the subject and yes it has become highly sought after and no matter what one thinks about the author and his sensational title tactics (ahead of his time perhaps) this is a well-written, well-illustrated (thirteen illustrations) volume that delivers just what the title says it does – Sexuality, Magic and Perversion!

 

Witchcraft Today – by Gerald Gardner.

This is a classic on the subject from witch and author Gerald Brosseau Gardner (1884-1964) published in 1954 shortly after the witchcraft laws were repealed in England in 1951. Most people were unaware that witches still existed let alone practiced the ‘old tradition’ due to the fact that they had to remain secret for fear of persecution which history shows became a sort of mania in society. Gardner strikes the right tone in dispelling wrongly accumulated myths and tunes into that interest and curiosity from a mostly ignorant population who have been force-fed stereotypical imagery of the old evil hag on the broomstick casting spells and consorting with demonic spirits. The book with its thirteen chapters (of course there would be thirteen) goes into great detail on the origins of witchcraft from the earliest theories from the stone age through to the murderous hatred of the Church of England and the Puritans. Dr. Gardner (actually a self-assumed ‘Doctor’) delights in telling us that witches were not involved in the Black Mass with the ‘unfrocked priest’, or at least not to his knowledge which sometimes falls short of perfect as he does not always seem confident of his theories but on other matters he is reliably rigid; he states correctly concerning the difference between the circle in witchcraft and from a ceremonial ‘ritual’ magic point of view for in witchcraft within the circle the witch is ‘between worlds’ and the circle keeps the power inside the circle, preventing dissipation; from the ceremonial or ‘diabolic’ aspect, the circle, with its names of protection, keeps the harmful spirits outside and the magician cannot leave the circle’s circumference as opposed to witchcraft where the witch can move freely in and out of the circle. Gardner drools over the fact that witches perform their craft naked, for ‘being realists’ they ‘have few inhibitions and if they want to produce certain effects they do so in the most simple way.’ (Chapter 1: ‘Living Witchcraft’). The great-wanded one goes on to describe the ‘Myth of the Great Mother’ and the ‘Horned God of hunting’ stressing that the woman (not the old hag of fiction and misrepresentation, but a beautiful maiden) as a representative of the Goddess is always dominant in the cult. That old murdering tyrant in cahoots with the Church of England, Mathew Hopkins, certainly got his pound of flesh from witch-mania – he was paid a ‘pound a head for all convictions’, the fact that most if not all of his victims did not practice witchcraft seemed neither here nor there, under torture, the most ardent believer in Christ will admit to salacious activities from cavorting with the Devil to murdering children – such persecution has sadly gone on within the Church and amongst other faiths for centuries and even in modern day culture it continues. The ‘mysterious’ Druids and the fact that witches believe in reincarnation are all very interesting and even his mention of the ‘Little People’ gets past one’s sentry of credibility but then in Chapter four, ‘Witch Practices’ he says that ‘the only man I can think of who could have invented the rites was the late Aleister Crowley’. They had met in 1947. Gardner goes on: ‘When I met him he was most interested to hear that I was a member, and said he had been inside when he was very young, but would not say whether he had rewritten anything or not.’ Here Gardner is suggesting that Crowley was a) a member of a witch coven, possibly under Old George Pickingill (as Doreen Valiente suggested in her book ‘Witchcraft for Tomorrow’ in 1978) and that b) Crowley was responsible for writing all or some of the Rites. Nowhere does Crowley mention being involved in Witchcraft but it is possible that Gardner ‘borrowed’ or had Crowley assist him with certain aspects of the rites, rites of which Gardner is only too familiar to tell us that he is forbidden to mention – ‘now I have seen things I’m forbidden to talk about, and quite admittedly I’m superstitious because of what I have seen of witches’ powers’. Well, perhaps he has good reason to be cautious for anyone working within occult circles will know that the power of the craft is very real and although most witches are forbidden to do harm (although it is well within their power to do so) there is always the possibility of being drawn to darker aspects, as in any spiritual or religious society or ‘cult’; I think that old Gardner would be surprised at the growth of witchcraft and its popularity within the media and film, its acceptance (almost) with today’s multi-beliefs and practices and that is why Witchcraft Today is still relevant today and tomorrow! Excellent!

 

The Rebirth of Witchcraft – by Doreen Valiente.

I absolutely love Valiente’s style of writing since first reading her book ‘Witchcraft for Tomorrow’ (1978) and ‘The Rebirth of Witchcraft’ published in 1989 ( I read a 2007 edition) is a perfect introduction to the ‘old craft of the wise’ – witchcraft. Before my own interest and involvement in ceremonial magic I felt a natural inclination towards witchcraft and to this day it seems a perfectly sensible expression of one’s spiritual essence and unlike the passive devotional sublimation of Christianity, witchcraft actually works! In thirteen chapters Doreen Valiente (1922-1999) pieces together the facts that we already know of traditional witchcraft and seeks historical confirmation, beginning at the trial of Helen Duncan in 1944, the last witch trial in England, looking at the reform of the witchcraft act of 1735 in 1951, stressing that the same year saw the publication of John Symonds’ biography of Aleister Crowley, ‘The Great Beast’; these two factors, along with a third: the opening of the Witches’ Mill at Castletown on the Isle of Man, instigated the ‘Rebirth of Witchcraft’. She briefly outlines the literary forerunners which helped create interest in the old religion, such as the folklorist Charles Godfrey Leland (1824-1903) whose ‘Aradia, or the Gospel of the Witches’ (1899) is still influential; and Margaret Alice Murray’s ‘The Witch-Cult in Western Europe’ (1921) and ‘The God of the Witches’ (1931) along with Robert Graves’ 1946 masterpiece, ‘The White Goddess’. And so we come to the enigmatic figure of Gerald Gardner and Valiente’s introduction to the craft in 1952 through an article in a weekly called ‘Illustrated’, titled – ‘Witchcraft in Britain’ by Allen Andrews which mentioned the New Forest witch coven and Mr. Cecil Williamson’s Museum of Magic and Witchcraft on the Isle of Man. Valiente, who was living in Bournemouth with her husband, had been on a quest for occult knowledge finding Dion Fortune’s ‘The Mystical Qabalah’ which led to Symonds’s ‘The Great Beast’ and thus to Crowley’s ‘Magick in Theory and Practice’ which she found in the library, how scandalous! She wrote to Cecil who forwarded her letter to Gerald and the rest is history as they say and they met in the autumn of 1952 at Christchurch; Gerald had been initiated by Old Dorothy Clutterbuck in the New Forest and he in turn initiated Doreen Valiente in 1953. In chapter four she explores the techniques of working with Gerald and the concept and origin of the Book of Shadows which he devised before informing us that Gerald had told her that he met Crowley in 1946 and the Great Beast made Gerald a member of the O.T.O. – sex plays an important part in most occult societies, as in witchcraft through ritual flagellation and of course the Great Rite or the ‘Sacred Marriage’. Valiente found the influence of Crowley in Gardner’s Book of Shadows too overwhelming and offered to re-write it herself which she did. She looks at the origins of the Watchtowers at the cardinal points of the circle, the four angelic guardians and Gerald’s indiscretions with Fleet Street as he sought (somewhat naively) publicity through sensational statements (and absurd lies); eventually following the press attacks the coven split in the summer of 1957 and a deep trust in Gerald was also broken. Also of interest is Doreen’s own account from August 1964-May 1966 in chapter 7 ‘A Voice from the Past’ of her communications with a discarnate spirit of a traditional witch named John Brakespeare before we become consumed by several figures known within witchcraft circles such as the powerful witch Robert Cochrane who attacked the ‘Gardnerian’ witches; a man who was ‘obsessed with the question of the ritual use of herbal psychedelic drugs.’ (p. 133) Cochrane was definitely mentally unbalanced and following a suicide threat he eventually carried out his own destruction. And then there is the paranormal investigator, Leslie Roberts (1905-1966) who wrote the novels ‘Feathers in the Bed’ and ‘Shepherd Market’; during a lecture he spoke of a baby sacrifice in Rottingdean and caused a furore with a Police probe etc. and so we enter the mysterious world of Alex Sanders whom Valiente never met; he was a publicist and a fantasist and the man holds no interest for me personally. Before we descend into the ‘Age of Aquarius’ in chapter 13 there is time to look at feminist witchcraft and material relating to old George Pickingill of Canewdon who died in 1909 and the possible connection to Crowley being a short-term member of his coven (along with Crowley’s friend and fellow magician Allan Bennett); but we are told in various books on Crowley and from the great man himself that he met Bennett sometime after his initiation into the Golden Dawn on 18th November 1898 so why would a man learning the techniques of ceremonial magic suddenly wish to become a witch? I believe that it was Bennett who had been drawn to witchcraft either before or during his time in the Golden Dawn and Crowley, in awe of Bennett’s personality (they later shared a flat and Bennett taught Crowley certain elements of magic) wished just to be near this great and powerful magician, a man who impressed Crowley more than any other man! Whatever the truth is it is entertaining to assume Crowley entered a coven and was possibly thrown out as ‘undesirable’. We are told of this infamous ‘photograph’ that is said to exist depicting old George with Allan Bennett and a young man who looks terribly like Crowley, if so where is it and why are there no reproductions of it anywhere? Unless Jimmy Page has it stashed away somewhere in his vast Crowley collection we are unlikely to know the truth! Doreen Valiente has produced an absolutely fascinating and well-researched volume on the rebirth of witchcraft which no doubt has helped many on their journey along the way and will continue to do so. A marvellous book indeed!